The analysis of pregnancies terminated before and after the limit of viability: A medicolegal view.

PURPOSE: In the present study, the purpose was to determine the indications of pregnancy termination procedures that are performed before and after the limit of viability (between 10 and 22 weeks) in a tertiary center and to investigate the characteristics of the cases in which fetocide procedure was offered after the limit of viability (22 weeks and later). It also aimed to discuss the legal deadline for the fetocide procedure and legal aspect of pregnancy termination. MATERIAL AND METHOD: The present study was conducted as a result of the retrospective examination of 198 cases who underwent pregnancy termination after the 10th week of pregnancy (the legal limit for voluntary termination of pregnancy in our country) in our clinic and met the study criteria. The cases were divided into two main groups as Early Termination (10-22 weeks) and Late Termination (22 weeks and later). The characteristics of these groups (i.e. reason for termination, termination week) and the characteristics of the cases in which fetocide procedure was performed and the cases that were not (i.e. termination week, reasons for termination) were compared. RESULTS: A total of 171 (86%) cases were under 22 weeks and 27 (14%) were 22 weeks or more. In the cases terminated early, the gestational week was found to be highest [20 + 1 (12+3-21 + 1)] in those with preterm premature rupture of membranes, and lowest in those with fetal gastrointestinal abnormalities. No statistically significant differences were detected between the termination reason and the gestational week in the late-terminated group, and also, although the termination week of 5 patients for whom the fetocide procedure was offered [median = 23 + 1 (22+4-26 + 0] was higher than the week of 22 patients for whom the fetocide procedure was not offered [median = 22 + 4 (22+1-25 + 4], the difference was not found to be statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Since the majority of pregnancy terminations are performed before the viable period, the need for the fetocide procedure in pregnancy terminations is relatively low, and we think that this rate will decrease even more because the rate of early diagnosis of fetal anomalies increases as a result of developments in ultrasonographic imaging. Families who choose the termination of pregnancy search for other countries with appropriate legislation and the loss of time and the indecision of the family might cause the application of pregnancy termination after the viable period because of the limitations in the legal regulations of countries.

Evaluation of forensic reports issued in emergency departments and comparison with reports issued by the Council of Forensic Medicine.

BACKGROUND: Identify the deficiencies in the forensic reports prepared by the emergency physicians and to identify the frequent mistakes in these reports by comparing the forensic reports issued by the emergency physicians in the context of offences against physical integrity and the forensic reports issued by the Second Forensic Medicine Specialization Board for the same forensic cases. METHODS: Existence of the information that should be included in the standard forensic report (name, surname, address, event date, etc.) of 241 cases prepared by emergency physicians who were sent to the Forensic Medicine Second Forensic Medicine Second Specialization Board due to various reasons between February 1, 2019, and May 1, 2019, were reviewed retrospectively. Besides, whether the trauma causing the forensic event stated in these reports is life threatening or not and whether it can be eliminated with simple medical intervention or not were compared with the reports prepared by the Council of Forensic Medicine Forensic Medicine Second Specialization Board for the same events and certain mistakes were determined. RESULTS: Address, examination time, and incident date were not specified in forensic reports issued by emergency physicians with a ratio of 95.5%, 63.9%, and 75.9%, respectively. About 23.2% of forensic reports written by hand were not legible. When the reports prepared by the Council of Forensic Medicine and the emergency physicians for the same forensic events were compared in terms of the presence of life threat and treatment with simple medical intervention, it was shown that the emergency physicians were insufficient in determining the life hazard and the simple medical intervention to resolve the trauma causing the forensic event. It was found that the forensic reports issued in tertiary hospitals (education and research hospitals and university hospitals) were more accurate in determining the life hazard and treatment with simple medical intervention status of trauma which caused the forensic event when compared with forensic reports which were issued in primary and secondary line hospitals. CONCLUSION: Regardless of whether the physicians working in the emergency departments are general practitioners or emergency specialists, their sensitivity and knowledge level regarding the preparation of a forensic report was found to be insufficient. We believe that with the increase of coordinated planned multidisciplinary trainings that include emergency medicine and forensic medicine, the forensic reports that are arranged incorrectly will decrease and the awareness of physicians about the results of forensic reports will increase.

Evaluation of medical malpractice claims in obstetric ultrasonography: Opinion of The Council of Forensic Medicine in Turkey.

AIM: The Council of Forensic Medicine is an institution affiliated with the Ministry of Justice in the Republic of Turkey which acts in an official oversight capacity in cases of alleged medical malpractice in forensic medical science. Sonographers may face judicial sanctions as a result of ultrasonography examinations that they do not perform according to current guidelines. In this study we focused our attention to claims of medical malpractice related to obstetric ultrasonography that had been referred to the Council of Forensic Medicine. Our aim was to investigate the causes of malpractice claims related to obstetric ultrasonography and to present the expert opinions of our council about these claims in the light of literature. We have also planned to discuss what can be done with current guideline information to prevent situations that cause malpractice claims. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study herein was performed on 73 claims of medical malpractice in obstetric ultrasonography findings, all of which were referred by forensic authorities to the Second Specialization Board of Council Forensic Medicine from 2014 to 2018. A retrospective review of the reports generated from information contained within case files illuminates the reasoning behind medical error claims. Among the reasons examined are features of the ultrasonographic evaluation (number, week of examination, health institution), the traits of the evaluating physicians (institutions, branches, academic titles), congenital anomalies detected after birth, and maternal age. RESULTS: Analysis of the data shows that 79.5% of ultrasonographic examinations leading to claims of medical malpractice were performed in private health institutions. All cases of medical malpractice claims were associated with undiagnosed congenital anomalies, and that the form for informed consent was obtained for only 19.1% of cases that underwent second level ultrasonographic examination. Further, 53.3% of cases with congenital anomalies subject to litigation were anomalies of the extremities, and all four cases of alleged malpractice within obstetric ultrasonography were associated with extremity anomalies. The variety of academic titles of physicians performing the ultrasonographic examinations was not statistically significant. It was concluded that two ultrasonography examinations performed by two nuclear medicine specialists were not in accordance with medical norms. CONCLUSION: Although organizations such as AIUM, ACR, and ACOG try to set standards for ultrasound examination through practice guidelines, it is difficult to establish optimal standards for ultrasonographic examination. In light of the guidelines created by the above organizations, each country should set its own standard based on their own socioeconomic and health data. We conclude that it is not appropriate for obstetric ultrasonographic examinations to be performed by specialists in fields such as nuclear medicine, where ultrasonographic examinations are not a part of the core training curriculum. Obtaining a signed informed consent form from the patient prior to the second level ultrasonography examination will be useful for medicolegal defense purposes should a subsequent claim of malpractice be filed.

Evaluation of Forensic Cases in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit.

OBJECTIVES: Traffic accidents, falls, assaults, occupational accidents, intoxications, burns, electric shock, lightning strike, all cases of asphyxia, penetrating and firearm injuries, suspected or definite cases of sexual abuse, and suicide attempts should be evaluated in the forensic category. In this study, we aimed to present our intensive care experiences in forensic cases. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated forensic cases admitted to our Pediatric Intensive Care Unit between 1 February 2017 and 1 September 2018. RESULTS: This study included 153 children, 65 (42.5%) boys and 88 (57.5%) girls. The forensic causes of hospitalizations in the intensive care unit included drug intoxication with a rate of 54.9%, followed by suicide attempts with 24.2%, falling from a high place with 5.2%, child abuse with 5.2%, pedestrian (out-of-vehicle) traffic accidents with 2.6%, drowning in water with 2.6%, road (in-vehicle) traffic accidents with 2%, electric shocks with 2%, and CO (carbon monoxide) poisoning with 1.3%. The drug intoxication was caused by drugs prescribed to the mother and the child with a rate of 40.6% and 27.1%, respectively. Analgesic anti-inflammatory drugs (33.1%) and antidepressant drugs (22.3%) were identified as major causes of intoxication. In addition, paracetamol was the most common cause of intoxication, with a rate of 21.9% among all intoxication cases and 72.5% in the analgesic group. Amitriptyline was the most common agent in the antidepressant group (59.2%). The admission rate to the intensive care unit between 08:00 and 14:00 was 35.1% for suicide attempts and 16.4% for non-suicide attempts, with a statistically significant difference (p=0.025; p<0.05, respectively). CONCLUSION: Drug intoxications had the highest rate of forensic cases followed in our pediatric intensive care unit. The majority of these intoxications (69.4%) arose from accidental drug ingestion. Therefore, we believe that there may be a significant decrease in the number of hospitalizations of forensic cases associated with drug intoxications in pediatric intensive care units by preventing children's access to drugs.