Evaluation of Antigenic Comparisons Among BVDV Isolates as it Relates to Humoral and Cell Mediated Responses.

Antigenic differences between bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV) vaccine strains and field isolates can lead to reduced vaccine efficacy. Historically, antigenic differences among BVDV strains were evaluated using techniques based on polyclonal and monoclonal antibody activity. The most common method for antigenic comparison among BVDV isolates is determination of virus neutralization titer (VNT). BVDV antigenic comparisons using VNT only account for the humoral component of the adaptive immune response, and not cell mediated immunity (CMI) giving an incomplete picture of protective responses. Currently, little data is available regarding potential antigenic differences between BVDV vaccine strains and field isolates as measured by CMI responses. The goal of the current paper is to evaluate two groups of cattle that differed in the frequency they were vaccinated, to determine if similar trends in CMI responses exist within each respective group when stimulated with antigenically different BVDV strains. Data from the current study demonstrated variability in the CMI response is associated with the viral strain used for stimulation. Variability in IFN-γ mRNA expression was most pronounced in the CD4+ population, this was observed between the viruses within each respective BVDV subgenotype in the Group 1 calves. The increase in frequency of CD25+ cells and IFN-γ mRNA expression in the CD8+ and CD335+ populations were not as variable between BVDV strains used for stimulation in the Group 1 calves. Additionally, an inverse relationship between VNT and IFN-γ mRNA expression was observed, as the lowest VNT and highest IFN-γ mRNA expression was observed and vice versa, the highest VNT and lowest IFN-γ mRNA expression was observed. A similar trend regardless of vaccination status was observed between the two groups of calves, as the BVDV-1b strain had lower IFN-γ mRNA expression. Collectively, data from the current study and previous data support, conferring protection against BVDV as a method for control of BVDV in cattle populations is still a complex issue and requires a multifactorial approach to understand factors associated with vaccine efficacy or conversely vaccine failure. Although, there does appear to be an antigenic component associated with CMI responses as well as with humoral responses as determined by VNT.

BHV-1-Specific CD4+, CD8+, and gammadelta T cells in calves vaccinated with one dose of a modified live BHV-1 vaccine.

Expression of the high-affinity interleukin 2 receptor alpha chain (CD25) was used to monitor antigen-specific activation of T lymphocyte subsets (CD4+, CD8+, and gammadelta T cells) from cattle immunized with modified live bovine herpesvirus-1 (BHV-1). Calves seronegative for BHV-1 were either vaccinated with one dose of modified live vaccine containing BHV-1 or not vaccinated to serve as negative controls. Two animals vaccinated 7 and 5 weeks before the start of the experiment with two doses of modified live vaccine containing BHV-1 served as positive controls. Blood samples were taken from the nonvaccinate group, the positive control group, and the vaccinate group at 0, 21, 35, 60, and 90 days postinoculation (PI). Isolated peripheral blood mononuclear cells from immunized and control animals were incubated for 5 days with and without live BHV-1 ISU99. Compared to the nonvaccinates, a significant (p < 0.05) increase in expression of CD25 by CD4+, CD8+, and gammadelta T lymphocytes from the vaccinate group was detected following in vitro exposure to live BHV-1 after vaccination. This is apparently the first report using live BHV-1 to stimulate lymphocytes in vitro and showing CD8+ T cell activation. Peripheral blood from the positive control animals was depleted of CD4+, CD8+, or gammadelta T lymphocytes prior to incubation with BHV-1 to assess bystander activation in the CD25 expression assay. When incubated with live BHV-1, depletion of CD4+ T cells depressed the expression of CD25 by CD8+ T cells, but not gammadelta T cells. Depleting CD8+ or gammadelta T cells prior to in vitro culture with BHV-1 did not affect the expression of CD25 by the remaining T lymphocyte subsets. Vaccinates were protected from challenge with virulent BHV-1 at 110 days postvaccination compared to nonvaccinates. Expression of CD25 appears to be a useful marker for evaluating induction of antigen-specific T lymphocyte subset responses following vaccination.

Bovine viral diarrhea virus type 1- and type 2-specific bovine T lymphocyte-subset responses following modified-live virus vaccination.

Expression of CD25 (interleukin-2 receptor alpha chain) was used to monitor antigen-specific activation of T lymphocyte subsets (CD4+, CD8+, and gamma delta T cells) from cattle immunized with modified-live virus (MLV) bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV) vaccines. Two groups of 15 animals each were vaccinated with one dose of either BVDV genotype 1 (BVDV-1) or BVDV-1 and BVDV genotype 2 (BVDV-1/2). Six animals negative for both BVDV antibody and BVDV virus were used as negative controls. Three animals vaccinated 7 and 5 weeks before the start of the experiment with MLV BVDV-1 vaccine served as positive controls. Blood samples were taken from the negative control group, the positive control group, and the BVDV-1/2 group 0, 21, 35, 60, and 90 days after vaccination. Blood samples were taken from the BVDV-1 group 0, 21, and 90 days after vaccination. Isolated peripheral blood lymphocytes from immunized and control animals were incubated for 5 days with and without BVDV-1 or BVDV-2. Compared with nonvaccinated animals, a significant (P <.05) increase in expression of CD25 by CD4+ (60 days), CD8+, and gammadelta T (35 to 90 days) lymphocytes from the group given BVDV-1/2 was detected following in vitro exposure to BVDV-1 or BVDV-2 after vaccination. The CD8+ and gammadelta T cells from the group vaccinated with BVDV-1 had significantly (P <.05) increased expression of CD25 compared with nonvaccinates following postvaccination exposure to in vitro BVDV-1 but not to BVDV-2. There was no significant difference between the two vaccinated groups in CD25 expression on any of the T cell subsets in response to BVDV-1 or BVDV-2 exposure. A single administration of MLV BVDV vaccine may be more effective at stimulating CD8+ and gammadelta T cell-specific immune responses to the homologous genotype than to the heterologous genotype.