NIH-defined graft-versus-host disease and evidence for a potent graft-versus-leukemia effect in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

BACKGROUND: The prognostic value of the NIH consensus criteria for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is not well defined yet. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed NIH-defined GVHD in 147 acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) patients. RESULTS: The cumulative incidence of classic acute GVHD (aGVHD), late aGVHD and chronic GVHD (cGVHD) was 63%, 12% and 41%, respectively. cGVHD was subclassified as classic versus overlap syndrome in 40% versus 60% of cases. In multivariate Cox regression analysis with GVHD as time-dependent covariate, classic aGVHD grade III/IV had a negative impact on overall survival (OS) due to higher non-relapse mortality. cGVHD of any grade was associated with superior OS, which was due to lower relapse incidence. Classic cGVHD versus overlap syndrome had no differential impact. In 44 patients without GVHD after transplant who received donor lymphocyte infusions (DLI), the cumulative incidence of classic aGVHD, late aGVHD or cGVHD was 60%, 5% and 57%. Occurrence of cGVHD after DLI was associated with improved OS due to lower relapse incidence. CONCLUSIONS: The NIH consensus criteria for GVHD clearly define prognostic subgroups in patients transplanted for ALL. The improved OS in patients developing cGVHD after transplant or DLI gives clear evidence for a potent graft-versus-leukemia effect in this indication.

Reduced-intensity conditioning using fludarabine and antithymocyte globulin alone allows stable engraftment in a patient with dyskeratosis congenita.

Dyskeratosis congenita (DC) is a rare inherited disorder characterized by the triad of nail dystrophy, mucosal leukoplakia, and reticular pigmentation. Bone marrow failure is the principal cause of early mortality, and stem cell transplantation is the only cure for these patients. However, the results of conventional hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for patients with DC are poor because of the high incidence of transplant-related complications. We describe the successful treatment of a 21-year-old male with DC by nonmyeloablative HSCT from a matched unrelated donor. The gene responsible for the X-linked form of DC was screened and hemizygosity for the mutation Gln31Lys was found, which is consistent with the diagnosis. The conditioning regimen consisted of only fludarabine and antithymocyte globulin. Additionally, a graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis was administered with cyclosporine A (CSA) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). The regimen was well tolerated, no severe posttransplantation complications were observed, and engraftment was rapid and complete (granulocytes on day +11 and platelets on day +13). Seven months after HSCT, the patient developed GVHD of the liver after tapering CSA which was successfully treated with prednisolone, CSA, and MMF. At the time of reporting, 3 years after HSCT, the patient remained in good clinical condition with minimal signs of chronic GVHD of the oral mucosa. Thus, we conclude that a low-intensity conditioning regimen might be sufficient to induce permanent engraftment by using matched unrelated donor HSCT in DC patients and may avoid severe organ toxicity. Although allogeneic HSCT in patients with DC will not cure the underlying genetic defect it may significantly prolong survival through effective therapy for hematologic complications.

Allogeneic SCT in refractory or relapsed adult ALL is effective without prior reinduction chemotherapy.

We present 60 patients with refractory (n=8) or relapsed (n=52) adult ALL who received allogeneic hematopoietic SCT (HSCT) with (n=41) or without (n=19) prior reinduction chemotherapy. In our center, omission of reinduction is recommended if a suitable donor is promptly available, tumor burden is moderate and disease features suggest a highly aggressive course. Overall survival (OS) of the whole cohort at 1, 2 and 5 years was 42, 33 and 28%, respectively. Leukemia-free survival at 1, 2 and 5 years was 37, 33 and 24%. Deaths were due to relapse (n=25), acute or chronic GVHD (n=7), infections (n=8) or toxicity (n=4). Interestingly, patients who did not receive reinduction before HSCT had better outcomes than patients who received reinduction with OS at 1, 2 and 5 years being 58 vs 34%, 47 vs 25% and 47 vs 18%, respectively (P=0.039). Importantly, even achievement of a second CR after reinduction was not associated with improved survival compared to patients directly proceeding to HSCT. We conclude that patients who undergo HSCT for refractory or relapsed ALL can achieve long-term survival. In selected patients, reinduction chemotherapy can be omitted if immediate HSCT is feasible.