The rectal pocket syndrome after stapled mucosectomy.

OBJECTIVE: Stapled rectal mucosectomy (SM) is less painful than manual haemorrhoidectomy but may be followed by unusual complications which may require reinterventions. The aim of the present study was to report on a particular postoperative complication, the rectal pocket syndrome (RPS). METHODS: Six patients, four females and two males, five with severe proctalgia and signs of intermittent sepsis and one with faecal soiling following SM, underwent clinical examination, proctoscopy (n = 5) anal manometry and ultrasound (n = 4) revealing a painful rectal intramucosal pocket with an endoluminal orifice at the level of the suture line. Four of them underwent a reintervention. RESULTS: At surgery, a faecolyth was found to be entrapped in the rectal pocket with an underlying chronic abscess in four patients. The cavity was laid open and curetted in all cases. One of the females needed a fistulotomy of a low intersphincteric track after one year. In none of the others did endorectal pocketing and abscess or prostatitis recur after a mean follow up of 25 months (range 2-60 months). The male patient still had moderate postevacuation pain and prostatitis possibly via a bacterial translocation after two months. Overall, the incidence of the post mucosectomy RPS at our Units was 2.5%. CONCLUSIONS: The RPS can occur after SM, is likely to be due to a failure of either the purse-string or of the staples causing a suture defect leading to an intramural sinus, and may be successfully treated by a transanal lay-open in most cases.

Which surgical approach for rectocele? A multicentric report from Italian coloproctologists.

The most effective surgical technique for rectocele has not yet been clearly established. A retrospective multicentric study was carried out to compare the long-term results of 3 endorectal techniques (Block, Sarles and stapled) and the perineal levatorplasty, alone and in association, in a series of patients with symptomatic rectocele. From January 1992 to December 1999, 2212 patients with defecation disorders were referred to 5 Italian coloproctology units. An anterior rectocele was clinically diagnosed in 1045 patients and confirmed with defecography. On the basis of clinical and radiological parameters, 317 patients (312 women; mean age, 52.4+/-20.1 years) were selected for surgery. Group 1 consisted of 141 patients (136 women; mean age, 50.4+/-18.8 years) who were submitted to endorectal operations. Group 2 consisted of 126 women (mean age, 52.5+/-19.7 years) who received perineal levatorplasty. Finally, 50 women (mean age, 54.3+/-21.9 years) in Group 3 received endorectal operations associated with perineal levatorplasty. A total of 269 patients were followed postoperatively (mean period, 24.2+/-3.1 months, 27.5+/-5.4 months and, 22.8+/-2.8 months, respectively) with the same questionnaire and clinical examination. Three months after surgery, a defecography examination and anorectal manometry were performed in 136 and 132 patients, respectively. Operative time, hospital stay and time to return to work were significantly higher in Group 3 (p<0.001). There was one death in Group 3 due to severe sepsis. Main postoperative complications were: in Group 1, hemorrhage (7.8%, all Sarles), dehiscence of the endorectal suture (5.0%, all Block), distal rectal stenosis (2.1%, 1 stapled, 2 block), and rectovaginal fistula (1.4%, all Sarles); in Group 2, delayed healing of the perineal wound (16.4%); in Group 3 delayed healing of the perineal wound (22.0%), hemorrhage (6%, all Sarles), dehiscence (4.0%), stenosis (2.0%). 17.3% of patients of Group 2 and 22.5% of Group 3 complained of dyspareunia. Postoperative defecography showed a complete absence of the rectocele in 44.1% of patients and reduction of size in the others, without significant differences among the three groups. Manometric pattern was not significantly modified by surgery. Significant symptoms recurred in 5.9% of the patients in Group 1, 6.4% in Group 2, and 5.0% in Group 3. Perineal levatorplasty did not significantly improve obstructed defecation, as it did not allow to excise the rectal mucosal prolapse, and was followed by an high incidence of delayed healing of the perineal wound and dyspareunia. Sarles procedure achieved better control of mucosal prolapse but carried a higher complication rate compared to the others. The association of the perineal levatorplasty with an endorectal technique required significantly longer operative time, and led to a longer hospital stay and time to return to work. In conclusion, the investigated techniques showed different patterns of postoperative complications: bleeding after Sarles, dehiscence after Block, dyspareunia after perineoplasty and fatal gangrene after stapled, but non of them showed a clear superiority over the others in term of clinical or functional results 2 years after surgery.

[Intestinal transit studied with radiopaque markers in patients with multiple sclerosis]. / Transito intestinale con marker radiopachi nei pazienti affetti da sclerosi multipla.

The patients affected with multiple sclerosis (MS) often complain of constipation. This symptom is little tolerated by the patient; its etiology is still unknown. MS patients often have their movements impaired by disease progress, so that they have to sit down for a long time, or else they exhibit severe problems walking or moving. MS patients also present low intraabdominal pressure during voluntary contraction of abdominal wall muscles. In these patients, the authors suggest to study intestinal transit time by means of radiopaque markers. To this purpose, the radiological follow-up contributes to the setting of colorectal MS dysfunctions by daily controls of the progress of per os radiopaque markers, focusing on colonic transit time and temporary deposit areas. The results show high incidence of anorectal constipation. Thus, the examination can be considered a useful tool in the study of MS dysfunctions and an effective alternative to anorectal manometry.

Motor potentials of bulbocavernosus muscle after transcranial and lumbar magnetic stimulation: comparative study with bulbocavernosus reflex and pudendal evoked potentials.

Motor potentials of the bulbocavernosus muscle were recorded in 17 healthy subjects after transcranial and lumbar magnetic stimulation. The latencies (SD) were respectively: 22.9 (1.8) and 5.9 (0.4) ms. The central conduction time was 17.0 (2.5) ms. The bulbocavernosus reflex presented an onset at 34.5 (3.3) ms and a negative peak at 43.1 (3.9) ms. The cortical pudendal evoked potential was W shaped: the first peak had a latency of 35.4 (2.8) ms. The concurrent recording of motor potentials, bulbocavernosus reflex, pudendal evoked potentials gives a measure of peripheral and central, afferent and efferent neurological pathways related to pudendal nerve function.

[Tumor markers in colorectal neoplasm pathology: our experience of the diagnostic and prognostic importance of CEA antigen]. / I markers tumorali nella patologia neoplastica del colon-retto: nostra esperienza sul significato diagnostico e prognostico dell'antigene CEA.

It is well known that the presence of a tumour may be accompanied by production and release into the serum of a substantial number of protein and/or hormonal substances. Only relatively recently, however, have investigators begun to identify which of these supposed markers may actually be clinically useful. A picture is thus gradually emerging of a number of markers (in actual fact only very few) which are already clinically useful, as well as others which are clinically promising and numerous markers which require more thorough clinical evaluation. Prominent among those already in clinical use is undoubtedly CEA. Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) is a glycoprotein isolated for the first time by Gold and Friedman in 1965. Very recently, sensitive radioimmune and immuno-enzymatic assays have made it possible to determine serum levels lower than 3 ng/ml. Though high plasma levels of CEA do not indicate the presence of a tumour with certainty, very high levels are, however, to some extent indicative of its existence. In view of the fact that CEA possesses neither the sensitivity nor the specificity to be able to diagnose the presence or otherwise of a tumour, its use is generally recommended when formulating a prognosis or for monitoring surgical and/or medical therapy (chemotherapy and radiotherapy) in asymptomatic patients. We therefore carried out tests in 357 patients on file as having undergone surgery for neoplasms of the colon-rectum-anus, monitored in our colostomy outpatients' department, which was started up in 1980. 188 of these patients had already been submitted to CEA assay prior to surgery. The data are analyzed in relation to the site, stage and grade of differentiation of the neoplasm, the supposed radicality of the operation and the period of follow-up in these patients.