Oral delivery of Hyperimmune bovine serum antibodies against CS6-expressing enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli as a prophylactic against diarrhea.

BACKGROUND: . Oral administration of bovine antibodies active against enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) have demonstrated safety and efficacy against diarrhea in human challenge trials. The efficacy of bovine serum immunoglobulins (BSIgG) against recombinant colonization factor CS6 or whole cell ETEC strain B7A was assessed against challenge with the CS6-expressing B7A. METHODS: . This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in which healthy adults received oral hyperimmune BSIgG anti-CS6, anti-B7A whole cell killed or non-hyperimmune BSIgG (placebo) in a 1:1:1 ratio then challenged with ETEC B7A. Two days pre-challenge, volunteers began a thrice daily, seven day course of immunoprophylaxis. On day 3, subjects received 1 × 1010 CFUs of B7A. Subjects were observed for safety and the primary endpoint of moderate-severe diarrhea (MSD). RESULTS: . A total of 59 volunteers received product and underwent ETEC challenge. The BSIgG products were well-tolerated across all subjects. Upon challenge, 14/20 (70%) placebo recipients developed MSD, compared to 12/19 (63%; p = .74) receiving anti-CS6 BSIgG and 7/20 (35%; p = .06) receiving anti-B7A BSIgG. Immune responses to the ETEC infection were modest across all groups. CONCLUSIONS: . Bovine-derived serum antibodies appear safe and well tolerated. Antibodies derived from cattle immunized with whole cell B7A provided 50% protection against MSD following B7A challenge; however, no protection was observed in subjects receiving serum antibodies targeting CS6. The lack of observed efficacy in this group may be due to low CS6 surface expression on B7A, the high dose challenge inoculum and/or the use of serum derived antibodies versus colostrum-derived antibodies.

Impact of antioxidants on the ability of phenolic phytochemicals to kill HCT116 colon cancer cells.

Certain phenolic phytochemicals can kill cancer cells. Possible interference from antioxidants is a concern, and this issue has not been studied appreciably. Therefore, the effect of ascorbate and N-acetylcysteine on the ability of epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) and curcumin to kill HCT116 colon cancer cells was examined. EGCG and curcumin each caused DNA damage in the cells. The DNA-damaging ability of EGCG, but not curcumin, was hindered by either ascorbate or NAC, which was also shown in HT29 and SW480 colon cancer cells. Also, iron chelators (deferoxamine and 2,2'-dipyridyl) inhibited the ability of EGCG, but not curcumin, to cause damage to the DNA in HCT116 cells. Interestingly, curcumin, but not EGCG, increased the expression of growth arrest and DNA damage-inducible gene 153 and also heme oxygenase-1, and this stress gene upregulation by curcumin was antioxidant-insensitive. With prolonged incubation of HCT116 cells with either EGCG or curcumin, cell shrinkage, membrane blebbing, apoptotic bodies, and chromatin condensation/fragmentation were observed. These morphological changes were not apparent in EGCG-treated cells that had been pretreated with either ascorbate or NAC. However, the ascorbate and NAC pretreatments did not prevent the occurrence of the morphological changes in curcumin-treated cells. Thus, these findings suggest that ascorbate and NAC interfere with the ability of EGCG, but not curcumin, to kill HCT116 cells. This basic knowledge may help to better plan and optimize strategies for chemoprevention or chemotherapy.