Stereotactic Body radiotherapy and pedicLE screw fixatioN During one hospital visit for patients with symptomatic unstable spinal metastases: a randomized trial (BLEND RCT) using the Trials within Cohorts (TwiCs) design.

BACKGROUND: Spinal metastases can lead to unremitting pain and neurological deficits, which substantially impair daily functioning and quality of life. Patients with unstable spinal metastases receive surgical stabilization followed by palliative radiotherapy as soon as wound healing allows. The time between surgery and radiotherapy delays improvement of mobility, radiotherapy-induced pain relief, local tumor control, and restart of systemic oncological therapy. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) enables delivery of preoperative high-dose radiotherapy while dose-sparing the surgical field, allowing stabilizing surgery within only hours. Patients may experience earlier recovery of mobility, regression of pain, and return to systemic oncological therapy. The BLEND RCT evaluates the effectiveness of SBRT followed by surgery within 24 h for the treatment of symptomatic, unstable spinal metastases. METHODS: This phase III randomized controlled trial is embedded within the PRospective Evaluation of interventional StudiEs on boNe meTastases (PRESENT) cohort. Patients with symptomatic, unstable spinal metastases requiring stabilizing surgery and radiotherapy will be randomized (1:1). The intervention group (n = 50) will be offered same-day SBRT and surgery, which they can accept or refuse. According to the Trial within Cohorts (TwiCs) design, the control group (n = 50) will not be informed and receive standard treatment (surgery followed by conventional radiotherapy after 1-2 weeks when wound healing allows). Baseline characteristics and outcome measures will be captured within PRESENT. The primary outcome is physical functioning (EORTC-QLQ-C15-PAL) 4 weeks after start of treatment. Secondary endpoints include pain response, time until return to systemic oncological therapy, quality of life, local tumor control, and adverse events up to 3 months post-treatment. DISCUSSION: The BLEND RCT evaluates the effect of same-day SBRT and stabilizing surgery for the treatment of symptomatic, unstable spinal metastases compared with standard of care. We expect better functional outcomes, faster pain relief, and continuation of systemic oncological therapy. The TwiCs design enables efficient recruitment within an ongoing cohort, as well as prevention of disappointment bias and drop-out as control patients will not be informed about the trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05575323. Registered on October 11, 2022.

Patient-reported outcome measures in a pharmacokinetic study with sunitinib, a prospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: During treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors, such as sunitinib, patients experience treatment and/or disease-related symptoms. Although application of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) enhances early recognition of symptoms, early clinical trials are focused on symptom severity objectified by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) in order to evaluate drug safety and to determine a personalized and/or safe dosage range. To gain insight into patient-reported symptoms in addition to healthcare professional-reported adverse events (AEs), a substudy was conducted in an ongoing pharmacokinetic-guided sunitinib dosing study. METHODS: In patients for whom sunitinib was considered standard therapy or patients with advanced/metastatic tumors for whom no standard therapy was available, patient-reported symptoms and well-being besides healthcare professional-reported AEs were assessed. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients were included for analysis. Over 50% of them experienced a decreased well-being, caused by symptoms of mild and moderate intensity. Compared to healthcare professionals, all measured symptoms, with the exception of fatigue and vomiting, were reported statistically significantly more often by patients. CONCLUSIONS: Application of PROMs in early clinical trials on personalized or individualized oral targeted anticancer agents is feasible and enhances early recognition of symptom burden due to multiple CTCAE grade 1-2 AEs, just as pro-active symptom management and effect evaluation of interventions performed. Application of PROMs in these trials might be clinically relevant in obtaining dose-limiting toxicities.

Patient-reported symptoms and stepwise symptom management in patients on epidermal growth factor inhibitors: A retrospective, descriptive cohort study.

Adverse events (AEs) of epidermal growth factor inhibitors (EGFRi) influence well-being with a risk to dose modifications (DMs). Hereby, clinical benefit of treatment might be affected. This retrospective cohort study was set up to gain insight into the suitability and added value of a patient-reported outcome measurement tool (PROM), together with a stepwise intervention management plan for EGFRi-related AEs in daily practice. The primary objective was to gain insight into total treatment duration and DMs, and the secondary objective to gain insight into patient-reported symptoms and well-being as well as healthcare professional-reported AEs. Sixty-eight patients on cetuximab and 19 on panitumumab treatment were included for analysis; 69% had squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck (SCCHN) and 26% metastatic colorectal carcinoma. DMs due to AEs occurred in 39% of the patients and dose discontinuations in 22%. Especially anorexia, dysphagia, oral pain and skin changes led to a decreased well-being. In patients on EGFRi, application of PROMs together with a stepwise symptom management plan enhances early recognition of symptom burden, pro-active symptom management and effect evaluation of interventions performed whereby well-being recovers. Since only SCCHN patients discontinued treatment due to AEs, patient-centred care focused on radiotherapy-related AEs, creates opportunities for amelioration.

Symptoms from treatment with sunitinib or sorafenib: a multicenter explorative cohort study to explore the influence of patient-reported outcomes on therapy decisions.

PURPOSE: Optimal long-lasting treatment with sunitinib and sorafenib is limited by dose modifications (DMs) due to adverse events (AEs). These AEs may be underrecognized and their influence on health-related quality of life (HRQL) underestimated. Improved insight into the relationship between AEs and therapy decisions is needed. To improve decision making around managing symptoms and reduce DMs, this study was set up to explore the influence of patient-reported symptoms on therapy decisions. METHODS: In this multicenter cohort study, patient characteristics, reasons for and different forms of used dose modifications, and AEs were prospectively obtained from cancer patients on sunitinib/sorafenib treatment. Used instruments to get insight into AEs were the patient-scored Utrecht Symptom Diary (USD) and the professional-scored Common Terminology Criteria for AEs version 3.0. RESULTS: Median total treatment duration in 42 patients was 16 weeks. Median time till dose modification was 10 weeks. DMs occurred mostly due to multiple mild AEs. By using the USD, a higher prevalence of most AEs was found compared to the literature. Sixty percent of the patients experienced a decreased HRQL due to multiple AEs. CONCLUSIONS: Because severe AEs due to sunitinib/sorafenib treatment seldom occur, it is more important to focus on treating and preventing multiple mild AEs with higher impact on HRQL, when trying to avoid dose modifications. Using patient self-reported measurement methods helps to early recognize symptoms and to differentiate among symptom intensities. This systematic approach might help to achieve the optimal dosing, which might improve PFS and OS.

Impact of integration of clinical and outpatient units on cancer patient satisfaction.

OBJECTIVE: There is an ongoing drive to measure and improve quality of care. Donabedians' quality framework with structure, process and outcome domains provides a useful hold to examine quality of care. The aim of this study was to address the effect of an intervention in hospital structure (integration of three units into one) with the purpose of improving processes (increase meeting, cooperation and communication between professionals and patients) and its effect on the outcome (cancer patient satisfaction). DESIGN: Pre-test-post-test. SETTING: University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands, Department of Medical Oncology. PARTICIPANTS: Cancer patients (n = 174, n = 97). INTERVENTIONS: Physical integration by bringing separately located units (outpatient clinic, day-care clinic, clinical ward) together in one wing of the hospital and adjustments in communication and coordination structures. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Patient satisfaction questionnaire. RESULTS: Satisfaction with care improved for six scales (27%) after integration. Effect sizes (ESs) ranged from 0.36 to 0.80, indicating a small to moderate effect. The most important improvement was found at the day-care clinic on aspects like 'the degree in which the nurses were informed about a patients situation', 'privacy', 'interior design', 'quality of hospital equipment', 'sanitary supplies' and 'waiting periods'. With regard to continuity and coordination of care, satisfaction increased for five items (28% of items concerning continuity and coordination of care). ESs ranged from 0.42 to 0.75. CONCLUSIONS: Integration of three oncology units into one unit had a positive impact on care delivery processes and resulted in improved patient satisfaction concerning care and treatment.

Medical oncology patients' preferences with regard to health care: development of a patient-driven questionnaire.

BACKGROUND: To improve quality of care for cancer patients, it is important to have an insight on the patient's view on health care and on their specific wishes, needs and preferences, without restriction and without influence of researchers and health care providers. The aim of this study was to develop a questionnaire assessing medical oncology patients' preferences for health care based on their own input. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Items were generated using 10 focus group interviews with 51 cancer patients. A preliminary questionnaire was handed out to 681 patients of seven Dutch departments of medical oncology. Explorative factor analysis was carried out on the 386 returned questionnaires (response 57%). RESULTS: Focus group interviews resulted in a preliminary questionnaire containing 136 items. Explorative factor analysis resulted in a definitive questionnaire containing 123 items (21 scales and eight single items). Patients rated expertise, safety, performance and attitude of physicians and nurses as the most important issues in cancer care. CONCLUSION: This questionnaire may be used to assess preferences of cancer patients and to come to a tailored approach of health care that meets patients' wishes and needs.

Are anxiety and depressed mood related to physical symptom burden? A study in hospitalized advanced cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Anxiety and depressed mood are common symptoms in hospitalized advanced cancer patients. It is often presumed that anxiety and depression affect the occurrence and experience of physical symptoms. PURPOSE: To analyse the relation between anxiety, depressed mood and the presence and intensity of physical symptoms. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Anxiety and depressed mood were assessed in a hospitalized advanced cancer population (n = 79) primarily by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and also by a single-item question ;Are you anxious and/or depressed?' and by the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS). Physical symptoms were assessed by a semi-structured interview and by the ESAS. RESULTS: Thirty-four percent of the patients reported anxiety, 56% depressed mood and 29% both, as assessed by the HADS. The correlations between HADS, the single-item question and the ESAS were low. No association was found between anxiety or depressed mood and the presence of physical symptoms. Patients who were anxious or depressed had higher ESAS scores for insomnia and drowsiness; scores for pain, anorexia, asthenia, nausea and dyspnea were independent of anxiety and/or depressed mood. CONCLUSION: The relationship between anxiety, depressed mood and the presence and intensity of physical symptoms in hospitalized advanced cancer patients is very limited.

Telephone consultation in palliative care for cancer patients: 5 years of experience in The Netherlands.

GOALS OF WORK: To analyze cancer patient-related consultations of a telephone helpdesk (TH) for palliative care over a period of 5 years in the region of Utrecht, The Netherlands. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A descriptive analysis was performed of consultations over a period of 5 years (2001-2006). The discipline and location of requesting professionals, patient characteristics, reasons for calling, symptoms, palliative care problems and needs for support were registered. MAIN RESULTS: A total of 1,794 consultations were analyzed. There was an increasing number of consultations during the study period. Of the patients, 51% were male and their median age was 65 years (range 0-104). Eighty-four percent were treated at home by their general practitioner. Two thirds of the patients had a life expectancy <4 weeks. Most questions referred to pain (49%), delirium (20%), nausea and vomiting (16%) and dyspnea (12%). The median number of symptoms was 1 (0-6). Of the questions, 54% were related to pharmacological problems, 19% to psychological problems and 21% to the organization of care. Of the requesting professionals, 17% asked for support for themselves. Of the consultations, 14% were related to end-of-life issues: palliative sedation (11%) and euthanasia (3%). CONCLUSION: After more than 5 years, the 24-h telephone consultation service fulfills a need for general practitioners dealing with daily dilemmas in palliative care treatment for cancer patients at home during the last period of their life.