DNA-PK inhibitor AZD7648 is a more portent radiosensitizer than PARP inhibitor Olaparib in BRCA1/2 deficient tumors.

The effectiveness of radiotherapy depends on the sensitivities of 'normal' and cancer cells to the administered radiation dose. Increasing the radiosensitivity of cancers by inhibiting DNA damage repair is a goal of much current research, however success depends on avoiding concomitant sensitization of normal tissues inevitably irradiated during therapy. In this study we investigated the mechanisms of radiosensitization for DNA-PK and PARP inhibitors by examining the impacts on proliferating vs quiescent cell populations. Experiments were performed in BRCA1/2null and wild-type parental cancer models in vitro and in vivo. Overall AZD7648 has greater radiosensitizing activity relative to Olaparib, with BRCA2-deficient models showing the greatest sensitivity. However, DNA-PK inhibitor AZD7648 also produced greater toxicity in all irradiated mice. While both DNA-PK and PARP inhibition sensitizes wild type tumor cells to radiation, in BRCA1/2 deficient cells PARP inhibition by Olaparib had limited radiosensitization capacity. Quiescent cells are more radioresistant than proliferating cells, and these were also effectively sensitized by AZD7648 while Olaparib was unable to increase radiation-induced cell kill, even in BRCA1/2null cells. These findings underscore the distinct mechanisms of radiosensitization for DNA-PK and PARP inhibitors. While DNA-PK inhibitors are able to target both proliferating and non-proliferating tumor cells for greater overall anti-cancer benefit, their application is limited by exacerbation of normal tissue toxicities. Conversely, PARP inhibitors exhibit selective activity for proliferating cells, providing a mechanism for targeting activity to cancers, but due to poor activity in non-proliferating cells they have an overall reduced impact on tumor growth control. This study highlights the importance of creating a therapeutic ratio with DNA damage repair inhibition radiation sensitizing strategies.

Radiation and chemo-sensitizing effects of DNA-PK inhibitors are proportional in tumors and normal tissues.

Inhibitors of DNA-PK sensitize cancers to radiotherapy and DNA-damaging chemotherapies, with candidates in clinical trials. However, the degree to which DNA-PK inhibitors also sensitize normal tissues remains poorly characterized. In this study we compare tumor growth control and normal tissue sensitization following DNA-PK inhibitors in combination with radiation and etoposide. FaDu tumor xenografts implanted in mice were treated with 10 - 15Gy irradiation ± 3 - 100 mg/kg AZD7648. A dose-dependent increase in time to tumor volume doubling following AZD7648 was proportional to an increase in toxicity scores of the overlying skin. Similar effects were seen in the intestinal jejunum, tongue and FaDu tumor xenografts of mice assessed for proliferation rates at 3.5 days after treatment with etoposide or 5Gy whole body irradiation ± DNA-PK inhibitors AZD7648 or peposertib (M3814). Additional organs were examined for sensitivity to DNA-PK inhibitor activity in ATM-deficient mice, where DNA-PK activity is indicated by surrogate marker γH2AX. Inhibition was observed in heart, brain, pancreas, thymus, tongue and salivary glands of ATM-deficient mice treated with the DNA-PK inhibitors relative to radiation alone. Similar reductions are also seen in ATM-deficient FaDu tumor xenografts where both pDNA-PK and γH2AX staining could be performed. Conclusions: DNA-PK inhibitor-mediated sensitization to radiation and DNA-damaging chemotherapy is not limited to tumor tissues, but also extends to normal tissues sustaining DNA damage. These data are useful for interpretation of the sensitizing effects of DNA damage repair inhibitors, where a therapeutic index showing greater cell-killing effects on cancer cells is crucial for optimal clinical translation.