Feasibility of FDG-PET in myocarditis: Comparison to CMR using integrated PET/MRI.

OBJECTIVE: Besides cardiac sarcoidosis, FDG-PET is rarely used in the diagnosis of myocardial inflammation, while cardiac MRI (CMR) is the actual imaging reference for the workup of myocarditis. Using integrated PET/MRI in patients with suspected myocarditis, we prospectively compared FDG-PET to CMR and the feasibility of integrated FDG-PET/MRI in myocarditis. METHODS: A total of 65 consecutive patients with suspected myocarditis were prospectively assessed using integrated cardiac FDG-PET/MRI. Studies comprised T2-weighted imaging, late gadolinium enhancement (LGE), and simultaneous PET acquisition. Physiological glucose uptake in the myocardium was suppressed using dietary preparation. RESULTS: FDG-PET/MRI was successful in 55 of 65 enrolled patients: two patients were excluded due to claustrophobia and eight patients due to failed inhibition of myocardial glucose uptake. Compared with CMR (LGE and/or T2), sensitivity and specificity of PET was 74% and 97%. Overall spatial agreement between PET and CMR was κ = 0.73. Spatial agreement between PET and T2 (κ = 0.75) was higher than agreement between PET and LGE (κ = 0.64) as well as between LGE and T2 (κ = 0.56). CONCLUSION: In patients with suspected myocarditis, FDG-PET is in good agreement with CMR findings.

Integrated FDG PET/MR Imaging for the Assessment of Myocardial Salvage in Reperfused Acute Myocardial Infarction.

PURPOSE: To compare the size of the area with reduced myocardial fluorodeoxygluose (FDG) uptake with the endocardial surface area (ESA) method as a marker for the area at risk in patients with reperfused acute myocardial infarction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was approved by the local institutional review board. All patients gave written informed consent prior to their examination. Twenty-five patients (mean age ± standard deviation, 54 years ± 14) underwent prospective cardiac positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging after acute coronary occlusion and interventional reperfusion. On late gadolinium contrast enhancement images, the size of infarction and the area at risk, as determined with ESA, were assessed and compared with the area of reduced FDG uptake. Statistical analysis comprised paired t tests and Mann-Whitney U tests, as well as Pearson r and Spearman ρ for correlations. RESULTS: In patients with infarcted myocardium and reduced FDG uptake (n = 18), a good correlation between the area of reduced FDG uptake and the area at risk according to ESA was observed (r = .70, P = .001). The area of reduced FDG uptake (31% ± 11 of left ventricular myocardial mass) was larger than the size of the infarct (10% ± 10, P < .0001) and the area at risk according to ESA (17% ± 13, P < .0001). In six patients, no late contrast enhancement was seen, whereas all patients had an area of reduced FDG uptake (29% ± 8) in the perfusion territory of the culprit artery. CONCLUSION: In patients with reperfused acute myocardial infarction, the area of reduced FDG uptake correlates with the area at risk as determined with the ESA method and is localized in the perfusion territory of the culprit artery in the absence of necrosis, although the area of reduced FDG uptake largely overestimates the size of the infarct and the ESA-based area at risk.

Integrated 18F-FDG PET/MR imaging in the assessment of cardiac masses: a pilot study.

UNLABELLED: The objective of the present study was to evaluate whether integrated (18)F-FDG PET/MR imaging could improve the diagnostic workup in patients with cardiac masses. METHODS: Twenty patients were prospectively assessed using integrated cardiac (18)F-FDG PET/MR imaging: 16 patients with cardiac masses of unknown identity and 4 patients with cardiac sarcoma after surgical therapy. All scans were obtained on an integrated 3-T PET/MR device. The MR protocol consisted of half Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin-echo sequence, cine, and T2-weighted images as well as T1-weighted images before and after injection of gadobutrol. PET data were acquired simultaneously with the MR scan after injection of 199 ± 58 MBq of (18)F-FDG. Patients were prepared with a high-fat, low-carbohydrate diet in a period of 24 h before the examination, and 50 IU/kg of unfractionated heparin were administered intravenously 15 min before (18)F-FDG injection. RESULTS: Cardiac masses were diagnosed as follows: metastases, 3; direct tumor infiltration via pulmonary vein, 1; local relapse of primary sarcoma after surgery, 2; Burkitt lymphoma, 1; scar/patch tissue after surgery of primary sarcoma, 2; myxoma, 4; fibroelastoma, 1; caseous calcification of mitral annulus, 3; and thrombus, 3. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) in malignant lesions was significantly higher than in nonmalignant cases (13.2 ± 6.2 vs. 2.3 ± 1.2, P = 0.0004). When a threshold of 5.2 or greater was used, SUVmax was found to yield 100% sensitivity and 92% specificity for the differentiation between malignant and nonmalignant cases. T2-weighted hyperintensity and contrast enhancement both yielded 100% sensitivity but a weak specificity of 54% and 46%, respectively. Morphologic tumor features as assessed by cine MR imaging yielded 86% sensitivity and 92% specificity. Consent interpretation using all available MR features yielded 100% sensitivity and 92% specificity. A Boolean 'AND' combination of an SUVmax of 5.2 or greater with consent MR image interpretation improved sensitivity and specificity to 100%. CONCLUSION: In selected patients, (18)F-FDG PET/MR imaging can improve the noninvasive diagnosis and follow-up of cardiac masses.