Comparative effect of dipeptidyl-peptidase 4 inhibitors on laboratory parameters in patients with diabetes mellitus.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the effects on laboratory parameters among monotherapy with five DPP-4 inhibitors in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM). METHODS: We identified cohorts of new sitagliptin users (n = 879), vildagliptin users (n = 253), teneligliptin users (n = 260), alogliptin users (n = 237), and linagliptin users (n = 180) in patients with type 2 DM. We used a multivariate regression model to evaluate and compare the effects of the drugs on laboratory parameters including HbA1c concentration and serum concentrations of creatinine, estimated glomerular filtration rate, high density lipoprotein, total cholesterol, triglyceride, aspartate aminotransferase, and alanine aminotransferase among the five DPP-4 inhibitors up to 12 months. RESULTS: Our study showed a favorable effect on HbA1c concentration and a slightly unfavorable effect on serum creatinine concentration in users of the five DPP-4 inhibitors, a favorable effect on lipid metabolism in sitagliptin, vildagliptin, and alogliptin users, and a favorable effect on hepatic parameters in sitagliptin, alogliptin, and linagliptin users, in comparison of the baseline and exposure periods. However, there was no significant difference in mean change in the concentration of any laboratory parameter among the five groups of DPP-4 inhibitor users. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we showed the effect of five DPP-4 inhibitors on glycemic, renal, and lipid metabolism, and hepatic parameters. DPP-4 inhibitors are well-tolerated hypoglycemic drugs.

Association between use of oral hypoglycemic agents in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and risk of depression: A retrospective cohort study.

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a risk factor for depression. Since brain insulin resistance plays a potential role in depression, the future risk of depression in patients with T2DM may be altered depending on the class of oral hypoglycemic agent (OHA) used for T2DM therapy. The aim of the present study was to determine if specific classes of OHAs are associated with a risk for comorbid depression in T2DM. Japanese adult patients with T2DM (n = 40 214) were divided into a case group (with depression; n = 1979) and control group (without depression; n = 38 235). After adjustment for age [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) for 10 years: 1.03; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.99-1.07; P = .1211], sex [AOR for female: 1.39; 95% CI: 1.26-1.53; P < .0001], hemoglobin A1c [AOR for 1.0%: 1.18; 95% CI: 1.11-1.26; P < .0001], duration of T2DM [AOR for 1 year: 1.00; 95% CI: 0.99-1.01; P = .4089], and history of seven medical conditions, the odds ratios for the development of depression was significantly lower for dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors [AOR: 0.31; 95% CI: 0.24-0.42; P < .0001]. However, there was no significant association for the other classes of OHAs. Therefore, this study finds that there is less risk of depression associated with the use of DPP-4 inhibitors for the treatment of T2DM.

A comprehensive analysis of association of medical history with airflow limitation: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Multiple comorbidity is common and increases the complexity of the presentation of patients with COPD. This study was a comprehensive analysis of the relationship between a medical history of 22 disease categories and the presence of airflow limitation (AL) without any history of asthma or bronchiectasis, compatible with COPD. METHODS: A total of 11,898 Japanese patients aged ≥40 years, who underwent spirometry tests, comprising patients with AL (n=2,309) or without AL (n=9,589), were evaluated. Generalized estimating equations were used to assess the relationship between the presence of AL and each disease. The model was adjusted for age, sex, body mass index (BMI) and pack-years of smoking. RESULTS: In multivariate analysis, female sex (odds ratio [OR]: 0.59; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.52-0.67), age (OR for 10-year age increase: 1.99; CI: 1.90-2.09), BMI (OR for 1 kg/m2 increase: 0.96; CI: 0.95-0.98) and smoking history (<15 vs 15-24, 25-49 and ≥50 pack-years; OR: 1.78, 2.6 and 3.69, respectively; CI: 1.46-2.17, 2.24-3.0 and 3.15-4.33, respectively) were significantly associated with the presence of AL. In addition, a history of tuberculosis (OR: 1.72; CI: 1.39-2.11), primary lung cancer (OR: 1.50; CI: 1.28-1.77), myocardial infarction (OR: 1.22; CI: 1.01-1.48), heart failure (OR: 1.53; CI: 1.29-1.81), arrhythmia (OR: 1.19; CI: 1.03-1.38) or heart valve disorder (OR: 1.33; CI: 1.14-1.56) was significantly associated with the presence of AL, after adjustment. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that a history of heart disease leading to abnormal cardiac function may be associated with AL and that the presence of certain types of heart disease provides a rationale to assess lung status and look for respiratory impairment, including COPD.

Comparative Effect of Calcium Channel Blockers on Glomerular Function in Hypertensive Patients with Diabetes Mellitus.

BACKGROUND: We conducted a retrospective cohort study to evaluate and compare the longitudinal effect of monotherapy with L-, L/T-, L/N-, and L/N/T-type calcium channel blockers (CCBs) on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and to investigate the association of treatment duration with eGFR in diabetic patients with hypertension. METHODS: Using a clinical database, we identified new users of five CCBs, i.e. amlodipine (L-type, n = 693), nifedipine (L-type, n = 189), azelnidipine (L/T-type, n = 91), benidipine (L/N/T-type, n = 183), and cilnidipine (L/N-type, n = 61). We used a multivariable regression model to evaluate and compare the effects of these drugs on eGFR and serum creatinine, up to 12 months after initiation of study drug administration. RESULTS: There was no significant association between treatment duration and both eGFR and serum creatinine level with all CCB types. In addition, there was no significant difference in mean change in eGFR among the five CCBs, with any treatment duration. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that monotherapy with an L-, L/T-, L/N/T-, or L/N-type CCB may have little influence on renal function parameters and may be safely used in hypertensive patients with diabetes.

A Comparative Effectiveness Study of Renal Parameters Between Imidapril and Amlodipine in Patients with Hypertension: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

INTRODUCTION: Imidapril is an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) that is frequently used as an antihypertensive drug in Japan. Although ACEIs are known to have adverse effects of decreasing glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and causing hyperkalemia, there are very few clinical data on the long-term effect of imidapril on glomerular function. We conducted a retrospective cohort study using a clinical database to evaluate and compare the long-term effects of imidapril and amlodipine on renal parameters in Japanese hypertensive patients in routine clinical practice. METHODS: We identified cohorts of new users of imidapril (n = 57) and a propensity score-matched group with an equal number of new users of amlodipine (n = 57). We used a multivariable regression model to evaluate and compare the effects of the drugs on laboratory parameters including serum levels of creatinine, potassium, sodium, blood urea nitrogen, and estimated GFR (eGFR) between imidapril users and amlodipine users up to 12 months after the initiation of study drug administration. The mean exposure of imidapril and amlodipine was 226.2 and 235.2 days, respectively. RESULTS: We found a significant increase of serum creatinine and potassium levels and a decrease of eGFR in imidapril users from the baseline period to the exposure period. The reduction of eGFR and the increase of serum creatinine and potassium levels in imidapril users were significantly greater than those in amlodipine users. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that imidapril decreased eGFR and increases the serum levels of creatinine and potassium compared with amlodipine, at least during 1 year of administration.