Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther ; 33: 102131, 2021 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33307235

RESUMO

AIM: The aim of the present study was to assess post space disinfection using different irrigants and their effect on radicular dentin bond to SERC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty single rooted mandibular 2nd premolars were collected and disinfected. All samples were decoronated maintaining root length of 12 mm and embedded vertically in acrylic resin. Shaping of the canal was performed using reciprocating system. Canals were dried using paper points and obturated with gutta percha via lateral condensation. Peso-reamers were used to create post space up to 10 mm. The post space was irrigated with 1% NaOCl before being randomly allocated into four groups (n = 10) according to different methods of canal disinfection. Samples in group 1 were subjected to photoactivated disinfection (PAD), group 2 irrigated with ethanol based propolis group 3 disinfected using ozone and group 4 irrigated with 2.25 % NaOCl with 17 % EDTA and ECL. GFP was fitted using SERC. Each sample was cut into 1 mm from coronal, middle and apical and subjected to pushout bond strength (PBS) via universal testing machine. Fracture analysis were confirmed by stereomicroscope at 40x magnification. For comparison of means, Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey multiple comparison test was used maintaining the level of significance at p <  0.05. RESULTS: The highest PBS at all three levels were found in group 4, canal disinfected with 2.5 % NaOCl with 17 % EDTA and ECYL. Whereas, the lowest PBS was observed in group 1. Inter group comparison, prosthetic space disinfected with propolis extract showed no significant difference to group 4 canal disinfected with 2.5 % NaOCl with 17 % EDTA and ECYL at all three levels (p > 0.05). Intra group comparison in all experimental groups showed no significant difference was noted in coronal and middle thirds of group 1, group 2 and group 3 respectively (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: 2.5 % NaOCl with EDTA and ECL treatment (group 4) remains the gold standard when used as a final canal irrigant. Propolis can be used as potential irrigant for canal disinfectant provided if the composition becomes standardized.


Assuntos
Ozônio , Fotoquimioterapia , Própole , Cavidade Pulpar , Dentina , Desinfecção , Ácido Edético , Humanos , Teste de Materiais , Fotoquimioterapia/métodos , Fármacos Fotossensibilizantes , Própole/farmacologia , Irrigantes do Canal Radicular/farmacologia , Preparo de Canal Radicular , Hipoclorito de Sódio/farmacologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...