Relationship between Perceived Quality of Prenatal Care and Maternal/Infant Health Outcomes.

OBJECTIVES: Studies have shown that quality of care affects patient health outcomes and well-being. In this study, we examine the relationship between perceived quality of prenatal care, birth outcomes, and postpartum depression (PPD). METHODS: We use data from the third wave of the Listening to Mothers dataset (2013). After removing missing data, the analytic sample size included 2168 women. Through linear and logistic regression analyses, we test the following hypotheses: higher perceived quality of prenatal care will have a positive association with a likelihood of vaginal delivery and normal birth weight outcomes, and a negative association with a likelihood of preterm birth; and higher perceived quality of prenatal care will have a negative association with a likelihood of PPD risk. RESULTS: Women who perceived higher quality of prenatal care were significantly less likely to have a preterm birth relative to women who reported lower quality care. Women who reported (any) medical jargon during their prenatal visits were less likely to have a normal birth weight baby. Women who reported provider use of medical jargon, lower perceived quality of interaction with a prenatal care provider, and lower perceived quality of US maternity care in general were more likely to be at risk for PPD. CONCLUSIONS: Negative prenatal care experiences may exacerbate adverse patient outcomes. Positive prenatal care experiences may buffer/improve adverse outcomes. Quality of care measures were most consistently predictive of PPD outcomes. Providers should focus on improving the quality of prenatal care as one of the means to improve maternal and infant health and well-being.

Ibrexafungerp: A new triterpenoid antifungal.

PURPOSE: The pharmacology, microbiology, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, efficacy, safety, and role of ibrexafungerp in the treatment of fungal infections are reviewed. SUMMARY: Ibrexafungerp is the first triterpenoid antifungal. Similarly to echinocandins, it inhibits the synthesis of 1,3-ß-d-glucan. However, it binds to a different site on the enzyme than echinocandins, resulting in limited cross-resistance. Ibrexafungerp exerts concentration-dependent fungicidal activity against Candida species and retains in vitro activity against most fluconazole-resistant strains. It is also active against Aspergillus species. Ibrexafungerp has been shown to be safe and effective in the treatment of vulvovaginal candidiasis caused by Candida albicans in phase 2 and phase 3 clinical trials. It is approved for vulvovaginal candidiasis in adult and postmenarchal pediatric females and is given as two 150-mg tablets orally, administered 12 hours apart. Ibrexafungerp is contraindicated in pregnancy. The most commonly reported adverse reactions were diarrhea, nausea, abdominal pain, dizziness, and vomiting. Ibrexafungerp should be avoided with strong or moderate CYP3A inducers, and the dose should be reduced with strong CYP3A inhibitors. Ibrexafungerp may be useful for patients who are not able to receive fluconazole or prefer oral therapy for the treatment of vulvovaginal candidiasis. However, it is more expensive than the 150-mg tablet of generic fluconazole, which is the current standard of care for vulvovaginal candidiasis. Clinical trials are ongoing for recurrent and complicated vulvovaginal candidiasis as well as invasive candidiasis and pulmonary aspergillosis. CONCLUSION: Ibrexafungerp is an alternative to fluconazole for the treatment of vulvovaginal candidiasis in nonpregnant females. It has the potential to be useful for recurrent and complicated vulvovaginal candidiasis as well as certain invasive fungal infections.

The enduring impact of birth: Women's birth perceptions, postpartum depressive symptoms, and postpartum depression risk.

BACKGROUND: Postpartum depression (PPD) and related maternal mood disorders affect anywhere from 7% to 19% of postpartum women. Although historically a neglected issue, there has been a strong impetus in the past few decades to implement routine, universal screening and to address PPD as a major public health concern. Still, there has been relatively little analysis of how the quality of the birth experience influences subsequent maternal mental health. We examine the relationship between perceived birth experience and two PPD screeners (Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale and Postpartum Depression Screening Scale). METHODS: Data came from waves I and II of the Listening to Mothers data set. This is the only national survey of US women's childbirth and postpartum experiences. In logistic and linear regression models, we used a 12-item "feeling" index (perceived birth experience) to predict (a) overall PPD screener scores, and (b) likelihood of meeting the clinical cutoff for depression risk. We also controlled for other known socio-demographic and obstetric risk factors. RESULTS: Perceived birth experience strongly and consistently predicted both PPD screener measures, and in both forms-raw scores and clinical cutoffs. By contrast, other known risk factors had inconsistent results across the two screeners. DISCUSSION: Perceived birth experience should be considered more central in assessing PPD. It may also be more robust than the PPD screeners used in practice, and therefore, could be a more reliable predictor of PPD. Providers should consider how the improved social-psychological quality of women's birth experience can act as a buffer to PPD and other postpartum concerns.