Prehospital tourniquet application in extremity vascular trauma: Improved functional outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Support for prehospital tourniquet use has increased, with recent data suggesting that tourniquet usage decreases shock without increasing limb complications. We hypothesized that prehospital tourniquet application in extremity vascular trauma, compared with no prehospital tourniquet application, is associated with lower rates of delayed amputation and better functional mobility. METHODS: We retrospectively studied adult patients with extremity vascular trauma at an urban civilian Level 1 trauma center (June 2016-May 2021). Outcomes of interest included delayed amputation and mobility at hospital discharge, measured by the Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care "6 Clicks" Basic Mobility Score. The "6 Clicks" Basic Mobility Score was documented by physical therapy; higher scores indicate more independent mobility. Injury mechanism, initial lactate, 24-hour transfusions, mortality, and acute kidney injury were also collected. Comparisons were performed using χ2 analysis and Fisher Exact and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. RESULTS: Of 232 patients, prehospital tourniquet application was not associated with mortality or lactate level (both P > .05). The prehospital tourniquet application group had more transfusions, lower rates of acute kidney injury, and fewer delayed amputations (all P < .05). Ninety-one patients (45 prehospital tourniquet application and 46 without prehospital tourniquet application) were evaluated for "Moving between Bed and Chair" in the "6 Clicks" Basic Mobility Score, with patients in the prehospital tourniquet application group demonstrating higher levels of independence (P = .034). CONCLUSION: Prehospital tourniquet application was associated with favorable outcomes, including higher functional mobility and decreased delayed amputation. This suggests that tourniquet use should be encouraged in the civilian setting to improve outcomes and reduce the risk of limb loss.

Are trauma surgical societies adequately addressing mental health after injury?

BACKGROUND: Survivors of physical trauma, their home caregivers, and their medical providers all have an increased risk of developing psychological distress and trauma-related psychiatric disease. The purpose of this study was to describe the frequency and change over time of trauma society research presentations regarding mental health to identify opportunities for growth. METHODS: Archives from 2018 to 2020 from the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma, the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma, and the Western Trauma Association were reviewed. The studies that measured mental illness, psychosocial distress, and other psychosocial factors were assessed: for (1) the use of patient-reported outcome measures ; (2) the association of psychosocial variables with outcomes; and (3) the interventions investigated. Change over time was assessed using χ2 analysis. RESULTS: Of 1,239 abstracts, 57 (4.6%) addressed at least 1 mental health-related factor. Mental health was more frequently studied over time (2018 [3.2%]; 2019 [3.5%]; 2020 [7.7%]; P = .003). The most frequently measured factors were post-traumatic stress disorder, quality of life, general mental health, and depression. Seventeen (29.8%) abstracts addressed substance abuse, most commonly opioid abuse. Seven (12.3%) abstracts measured mental health in caregivers or medical providers. Patient-reported outcome measures were used in 32 studies (56.1%). Two-thirds of studies reported findings suggesting that mental illness impairs trauma-related outcomes. Only 5 (8.8%) investigated interventions designed to reduce adverse outcomes. CONCLUSION: Although academic discussion of mental health after trauma increased from 2018 to 2020, the topic remains a limited component of annual programs, patient-reported outcome measures remain underutilized, and intervention studies are rare.