Associated Injuries in Maxillofacial Trauma: A Study in a Tertiary Hospital in South India.

AIM: Maxillofacial trauma when associated with concomitant injuries has a significant potential for increased morbidity. This study aims to identify the causes of trauma, evaluate the types of associated injuries and to highlight the significance of multi professional collaboration in sequencing of treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 300 patients who reported to the casualty of a tertiary Hospital in Karnataka with facial fractures were enrolled. RESULTS: Associated injuries were sustained by 162 patients. The predominant aetiology was the Road Traffic Accident with maximum number of patients in the age group of 20-29 and a male to female ratio of 10.1:1. The mandible was the most frequently fractured bone. Head injury was the most common associated injury. The mortality rate was 0.66%. The mean ISS and GCS values among the patients who sustained associated injuries along with maxillofacial trauma were higher and lower respectively, as compared to those without associated injuries with a statistically significant difference (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Implementation of strict road safety measures in the rural and interior regions of South India, to prevent morbidity and mortality due to road traffic accidents is essential. Injuries to the facial skeleton must be approached with the knowledge of probable associated injuries that could have been incurred.

Trigemino-Cardiac Reflex: A Phenomenon Neglected in Maxillofacial Surgery?

BACKGROUND: Trigemino-cardiac reflex is a physiologic response of the body to pressure effects in the region of distribution of the trigeminal nerve. Oral and maxillofacial surgical procedures can induce the development of this reflex, which leads to significant changes in the heart rate and sinus rhythms. This study intends to evaluate the effects of this reflex in patients with facial fractures and its subsequent management. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of thirty-seven patients with facial fractures who reported to the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery at Basaveswar Teaching and General Hospital, Gulbarga during a period from July 2015-March 2016 were considered for the study. RESULTS: A male preponderance is observed with the most susceptible age group being 21-30 years. Twenty-three patients sustained mid-facial fractures alone, nine patients had isolated mandible fractures and five patients had fractures of both the mid-face and mandible. A relative bradycardia was observed in the patients with mid-facial trauma, both at the time of presentation and also during the surgical reduction of midfacial fractures which improved after completion of procedure in most of the patients. However, in two patients, the bradycardia progressed to a cardiac asystole during midface manipulation which required immediate halt of the procedure and intravenous administration of atropine. CONCLUSION: Trigeminocardiac reflex though physiologic, which usually tends to subside without complications is not to be neglected in the surgeries of the maxillofacial skeleton. A propensity for unforeseen complications due to this reflex has to be avoided by meticulous monitoring of the ECG.

Ophthalmological Evaluation by a Maxillofacial Surgeon and an Ophthalmologist in Assessing the Damage to the Orbital Contents in Midfacial Fractures: A Prospective Study.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Midfacial fractures may often be associated with injuries to the orbit which may lead to notable dysfunction of the visual apparatus, if not detected early after injury. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the associated ophthalmic injuries in mid-face trauma and to emphasize the need for understanding the ophthalmic signs and symptoms by an attending maxillofacial surgeon. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total number of 60 clinically and radiographically proven subjects with midfacial fractures were considered in the study that underwent complete ophthalmological evaluation at initial presentation. Referral to ophthalmologist was considered to determine the exact nature of injury and its implications. Results by a maxillofacial surgeon and ophthalmologist were evaluated. RESULTS: In our study, a male predominance with a mean age of 32 years was observed, with the most common etiology being Road Traffic Accidents. Forty-two of the 60 patients exhibited sub-conjunctival hemorrhage accounting for 70 % of ocular injuries recorded. While 28 of the 60 patients displayed peri-orbital edema (53.3 %), 8 patients experienced diplopia (13.32 %) and 8 patients showed relative afferent pupillary defect (13.32 %). CONCLUSION: From our study, it becomes imperative that the maxillofacial surgeon should have a thorough knowledge of the various ophthalmic injuries that could occur in association with midfacial trauma in order to prevent visual complications to the patient. Understanding of the subtle injuries to the ocular apparatus which may be undiagnosed by a maxillofacial surgeon but have significant grave outcomes is essential.

Ascites in Children.

Ascites is an accumulation of serous fluid within the peritoneal cavity. It is the most common complication of liver cirrhosis. In children, hepatic, renal and cardiac disorders are the most common causes. Portal hypertension and sodium and fluid retention are key factors in the pathophysiology of ascites. Peripheral arterial vasodilatation hypothesis is the most accepted mechanism for inappropriate sodium retention and formation of ascites. Diagnostic paracentesis is indicated in children with newly diagnosed ascites and in children with suspected complications of ascites. Ascitic fluid is evaluated for cell count, protein level, and culture. The serum-ascites albumin gradient (SAAG) is the best single test for classifying ascites into portal hypertensive (SAAG >1.1 g/dl) and non-portal hypertensive (SAAG <1.1 g/dl). A neutrophil count ≥250 cells/mm3 is highly suggestive of bacterial peritonitis. The treatment of ascites due to non-liver disease depends on the underlying condition. In liver disease, diuretics as monotherapy or dual therapy and salt restriction form the mainstay of treatment in children with mild to moderate ascites. Fluid restriction is helpful in children with hyponatremia. In non-responsive ascites or in children with large ascites, large volume paracentesis (LVP) with albumin infusion should be performed. In children with refractory ascites, LVP with albumin administration, transjugular intrahepatic porto-systemic shunt (TIPS), peritoneo-venous shunting and liver transplantation are other therapeutic modalities that need to be considered.