Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
PLoS One ; 18(6): e0284320, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37294793

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Geriatric trauma patients represent a special challenge in postoperative care and are prone to specific complications. The goal of this study was to analyse the predictive potential of a novel nursing assessment tool, the outcome-oriented nursing assessment for acute care (ePA-AC), in geriatric trauma patients with proximal femur fractures (PFF). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of geriatric trauma patients aged ≥ 70 years with PFF was conducted at a level 1 trauma centre. The ePA-AC is a routinely used tool that evaluates pneumonia; confusion, delirium and dementia (CDD); decubitus (Braden Score); the risk of falls; the Fried Frailty index (FFI); and nutrition. Assessment of the novel tool included analysis of its ability to predict complications including delirium, pneumonia and decubitus. RESULTS: The novel ePA-AC tool was investigated in 71 geriatric trauma patients. In total, 49 patients (67.7%) developed at least one complication. The most common complication was delirium (n = 22, 44.9%). The group with complications (Group C) had a significantly higher FFI compared with the group without complications (Group NC) (1.7 ± 0.5 vs 1.2 ± 0.4, p = 0.002). Group C had a significantly higher risk score for malnutrition compared with Group NC (6.3 ± 3.4 vs 3.9 ± 2.8, p = 0.004). A higher FFI score increased the risk of developing complications (odds ratio [OR] 9.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.0 to 47.7, p = 0.005). A higher CDD score increased the risk of developing delirium (OR 9.3, 95% CI 2.9 to 29.4, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The FFI, CDD, and nutritional assessment tools are associated with the development of complications in geriatric trauma patients with PFF. These tools can support the identification of geriatric patients at risk and might guide individualised treatment strategies and preventive measures.


Assuntos
Delírio , Fraturas Proximais do Fêmur , Humanos , Idoso , Estudos Retrospectivos , Delírio/etiologia , Delírio/complicações , Fatores de Risco , Estado Nutricional , Avaliação Geriátrica
2.
Swiss Med Wkly ; 150: w20276, 2020 Jun 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32579696

RESUMO

AIMS OF THE STUDY: Post-acute care (PAC) is intended for older adult patients who are unable to return home directly after acute hospitalisation but who do not otherwise qualify for specific rehabilitation. However, data on potential predictors of PAC outcomes remain limited. Our aim was to identify patient characteristics upon admission to PAC that are associated with subsequent institutionalisation. METHODS: Prospective cohort study enrolling 140 former acute care inpatients aged 60 and older who were referred to PAC units at nursing homes in Zurich, Switzerland. MEASURES: Geriatric assessment at admission included Barthel Index (BI), Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), frailty status (Fried phenotype), nutrition and cognitive status. Logistic regression was used to determine statistically significant associations. RESULTS: Mean age was 84.1 (standard deviation [SD] 8.6) years; 62.9% of participants were women. Mean body mass index (BMI) was 25.0 (SD 5.8) kg/m2, with 12.1% being underweight (BMI <20 kg/m2). Mean BI at admission was 62.1 (SD 19.1), mean SPPB score was 5.2 (SD 2.8), and 55% were frail (≥3 Fried criteria present). After a mean length of stay in PAC of 30.9 (SD 16.5) days, 48.6% were institutionalised. Patients who were frail at admission had a 2.97-fold higher (odds ratio [OR] 2.9,7 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04–8.42), and patients who were underweight had a 4.94-fold higher (OR 4.94, 95% CI 1.11–22.01) chance of institutionalisation. Conversely, each points increment on the SBBP score lowered the likelihood of institutionalisation by 23% (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.65–0.92). CONCLUSIONS: Frailty, low Short Physical Performance Battery score and being underweight at admission to PAC were significantly associated with a higher chance of subsequent institutionalisation. Strategies to improve these factors could improve post-acute care outcomes.


Assuntos
Fragilidade , Institucionalização , Magreza , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Avaliação Geriátrica , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Cuidados Semi-Intensivos , Suíça
3.
Swiss Med Wkly ; 150: w20198, 2020 Feb 24.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32108929

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Post-acute care (PAC) programmes appear favourable for older adult inpatients too fragile to be discharged home without extensive support, but otherwise not qualifying for specific rehabilitation. Consequently, many Swiss nursing homes have opened PAC wards after a new federal law refined reimbursement in 2012. However, PAC outcomes in this setting have not been well studied. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the functional outcomes of a nursing home-based PAC programme for older adult patients and to evaluate the influences of age, gender and frailty status on these outcomes. METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study in 135 consecutive patients aged 60 and older admitted to PAC at three nursing homes in Zurich, Switzerland, over a two-month period. Geriatric assessment at admission included mobility, physical performance, cognition, nutrition, frailty, activities of daily living (ADL) and social support. The primary outcomes of the study, Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), handgrip strength (HGS) and Barthel Index (BI), were repeated before discharge from PAC. Multivariable linear models were used to analyse differences between these primary outcomes at admission and discharge, adjusting for baseline age, gender, BMI, length of stay (LOS), polypharmacy, cognition, and prior living status. RESULTS: We identified statistically significant improvements between admission and discharge (mean [95% confidence interval]; % change) in BI (69.0 [65.0–72.9] vs 79.6 [75.6–83.6]; +15.4%), gait speed (0.55 [0.48–0.62] vs 0.65 [0.58–0.71] m/s; +18.2%) and SPPB scores (5.5 [5.0–6.1] vs 6.9 [6.3–7.4]; +24%), p-values for all comparisons <0.001. CONCLUSIONS: In this real-word sample, PAC resulted in a significant and clinically relevant improvement in physical performance and ADL. However, our study should be replicated with a larger sample. Furthermore, long-term outcomes of PAC warrant additional investigation.


Assuntos
Atividades Cotidianas , Força da Mão/fisiologia , Cuidados Semi-Intensivos/métodos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Avaliação Geriátrica/métodos , Hospitalização , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Casas de Saúde , Alta do Paciente , Estudos Prospectivos , Distribuição por Sexo , Suíça , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...