RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Anastomotic recurrence is frequent in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) following ileocecal resection. The degree of endoscopic recurrence, quantified by the Rutgeerts score (RS), correlates with risk of clinical and surgical recurrence. Several studies demonstrate the accuracy of fecal calprotectin (FC) for detection of endoscopic recurrence, however the optimal threshold FC value remains to be established. The aim of our meta-analysis was to evaluate the accuracy of common FC cut-offs for detection of endoscopic recurrence. METHODS: We performed a systematic literature search for studies evaluating postoperative recurrence in CD which reported RS and FC levels. Endoscopic recurrence was defined as RS = 2-4 (or RS ⩾ 2). We calculated pooled diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and constructed summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves for each available FC cut-off value. RESULTS: A total of 54 studies were retrieved; 9 studies were eligible for analysis. Diagnostic accuracy was calculated for FC values of 50, 100, 150 and 200 µg/g. A significant threshold effect was observed for all FC values. The optimal diagnostic accuracy was obtained for FC value of 150 µg/g, with a pooled sensitivity of 70% [95% confidence interval (CI) 59-81%], specificity 69% (95% CI 61-77%), and DOR 5.92 (95% CI 2.61-12.17). The area under the SROC curve was 0.73. CONCLUSION: FC is an accurate surrogate marker of postoperative endoscopic recurrence in CD patients. The FC cut-off 150 µg/g appears to have the best overall accuracy. Serial FC evaluations may eliminate or defer the need for colonoscopic evaluation in up to 70% of postoperative CD patients.
RESUMO
Background: Anastomotic recurrence is frequent in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) following ileocecal resection. The degree of endoscopic recurrence, quantified by the Rutgeerts score (RS), is correlated with the risk of clinical and surgical recurrence. Noninvasive modalities such as capsule endoscopy (CE), magnetic resonance enterography (MRE), and intestinal ultrasound (US) may yield similar information without the need for ileocolonoscopy (IC). The aim of our meta-analysis was to evaluate the accuracy of those modalities for detection of endoscopic recurrence in postoperative CD patients. Methods: We performed a systematic literature search for studies comparing the accuracy of CE, MRE, and US with IC for detection of postoperative recurrence in CD. We calculated pooled diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and area under the curve (AUC) for each comparison. Results: A total of 135 studies were retrieved; 14 studies were eligible for analysis. For CE, the pooled sensitivity was 100% (95% CI, 91%-100%), specificity was 69% (95% CI, 52%-83%), DOR was 30.8 (95% CI, 6.9-138), and AUC was 0.94. MRE had pooled sensitivity of 97% (95% CI, 89%-100%), specificity of 84% (95% CI, 62%-96%), DOR of 129.5 (95% CI, 16.4-1024.7), and AUC of 0.98. US had pooled sensitivity of 89% (95% CI, 85%-92%), specificity of 86% (95% CI, 78%-93%), DOR of 42.3 (95% CI, 18.6-96.0), and AUC 0.93. Conclusions: CE, MRE, and US provide accurate assessment of postoperative endoscopic recurrence in CD. These modalities should gain wider use for detection of postoperative recurrence; the prognostic value of those diagnostic findings merits evaluation in further prospective studies.
