Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976) ; 45(9): 612-620, 2020 May 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31770332

RESUMO

MINI: This is a long-term prospective cohort study comparing the radiographic outcomes of anterior versus posterior instrumentation for Lenke 5 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Both approaches were comparable in terms of radiographic outcomes up to 10 years. The posterior approach is more prone to developing proximal junctional kyphosis. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: To compare the long-term, radiographic coronal and sagittal outcomes of these two approaches at 10-year follow-up. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Both anterior and posterior instrumented fusions have been found to be safe and effective treatments for Lenke 5 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with up to 2 to 5 years of follow-up. Few studies follow patients beyond this duration. METHODS: 36 patients who underwent anterior (n = 25) or posterior instrumented spinal fusion (n = 11) for Lenke 5 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis over a 4-year period were recruited and followed for 10 years. Preoperative clinical data include patient's age and age of menarche. Operative data included instrumented levels, duration of surgery, and surgical blood loss. Postoperative data included duration of hospital stay, duration of intensive care unit stay, and complications. Pre- and postoperative radiographic data collected include coronal Cobb angles for structural thoracolumbar/lumbar curves, and sagittal angles-sagittal vertical axis, thoracic kyphosis, global lumbar angle, pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt, sacral slope, and upper and lower end vertebrae. RESULTS: Posterior surgery had a shorter operative time (P < 0.010) and hospital stay (P < 0.010). Coronal plane deformity improved by a mean of 74% in the anterior group and 71% in the posterior group. There was no significant change at 10 years in both groups (anterior P = 0.455 and posterior P = 0.325). Sagittal parameters remained unchanged. There was a higher incidence of proximal junctional kyphosis in the posterior (45%) compared to the anterior (16%) group (P < 0.010). CONCLUSION: Both anterior and posterior instrumentation and fusion are successful surgeries after 10 years of follow-up. They are comparable with regards to their ability to achieve and maintain good correction of scoliotic deformities and have a low rate of pseudoarthrosis and instrument failure. Ideal sagittal parameters are maintained up to 10 years of follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.


Prospective cohort study. To compare the long-term, radiographic coronal and sagittal outcomes of these two approaches at 10-year follow-up. Both anterior and posterior instrumented fusions have been found to be safe and effective treatments for Lenke 5 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with up to 2 to 5 years of follow-up. Few studies follow patients beyond this duration. 36 patients who underwent anterior (n = 25) or posterior instrumented spinal fusion (n = 11) for Lenke 5 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis over a 4-year period were recruited and followed for 10 years. Preoperative clinical data include patient's age and age of menarche. Operative data included instrumented levels, duration of surgery, and surgical blood loss. Postoperative data included duration of hospital stay, duration of intensive care unit stay, and complications. Pre- and postoperative radiographic data collected include coronal Cobb angles for structural thoracolumbar/lumbar curves, and sagittal angles­sagittal vertical axis, thoracic kyphosis, global lumbar angle, pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt, sacral slope, and upper and lower end vertebrae. Posterior surgery had a shorter operative time (P < 0.010) and hospital stay (P < 0.010). Coronal plane deformity improved by a mean of 74% in the anterior group and 71% in the posterior group. There was no significant change at 10 years in both groups (anterior P = 0.455 and posterior P = 0.325). Sagittal parameters remained unchanged. There was a higher incidence of proximal junctional kyphosis in the posterior (45%) compared to the anterior (16%) group (P < 0.010). Both anterior and posterior instrumentation and fusion are successful surgeries after 10 years of follow-up. They are comparable with regards to their ability to achieve and maintain good correction of scoliotic deformities and have a low rate of pseudoarthrosis and instrument failure. Ideal sagittal parameters are maintained up to 10 years of follow-up. Level of Evidence: 3.


Assuntos
Vértebras Lombares/diagnóstico por imagem , Vértebras Lombares/cirurgia , Escoliose/diagnóstico por imagem , Escoliose/cirurgia , Fusão Vertebral/tendências , Vértebras Torácicas/diagnóstico por imagem , Vértebras Torácicas/cirurgia , Adolescente , Perda Sanguínea Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/diagnóstico por imagem , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fusão Vertebral/instrumentação , Fusão Vertebral/métodos , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Global Spine J ; 8(2): 156-163, 2018 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29662746

RESUMO

STUDY DESIGN: A single-center, retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: To predict patient-reported outcomes (PROs) using preoperative health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) scores by quantifying the correlation between them, so as to aid selection of surgical candidates and preoperative counselling. METHODS: All patients who underwent single-level elective lumbar spine surgery over a 2-year period were divided into 3 diagnosis groups: spondylolisthesis, spinal stenosis, and disc herniation. Patient characteristics and health scores (Oswestry Low Back Pain and Disability Index [ODI], EQ-5D, and Short Form-36 version 2 [SF-36v2]) were collected at 6 and 24 months and compared between the 3 diagnosis groups. Multivariate modelling was performed to investigate the predictive value of each parameter, particularly preoperative ODI and EQ-5D, on postoperative ODI and EQ-5D scores for all the patients. RESULTS: ODI and EQ-5D at 6 and 24 months improved significantly for all patients, especially in the disc herniation group, compared to the baseline. The magnitude of improvement in ODI and EQ-5D was predictable using preoperative ODI, EQ-5D, and SF-36v2 Mental Component Score. At 6 months, 1-point baseline ODI predicts for 0.7-point increase in changed ODI, and a 0.01-point increase in baseline EQ-5D predicts for 0.01-point decrease in changed EQ-5D score. At 24 months, 1-point baseline ODI predicts for 1-point increase in changed ODI, and a 0.01-point increase in baseline EQ-5D predicts for 0.009-point decrease in changed EQ-5D. A younger age is shown to be a positive predictor of ODI at 24 months. CONCLUSIONS: Poorer baseline health scores predict greater improvement in postoperative PROs at 6 and 24 months after the surgery. HRQoL scores can be used to decide on surgery and in preoperative counselling.

3.
J Spine Surg ; 3(2): 272-277, 2017 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28744512

RESUMO

Superior mesenteric artery (SMA) syndrome secondary to extrinsic compression of third part of duodenum is an uncommon complication following scoliosis surgery. It is imperative to diagnose this presentation at an earlier stage as it can be a potentially life threatening complication. If the diagnosis is missed or delayed, the mortality rate can be as high as 33% due to fatal complications like aspiration pneumonia, acute gastric rupture and cardiovascular collapse. We present a 13-year-old patient who was diagnosed with SMA syndrome in the late post-operative period (5.1 weeks) following scoliosis correction surgery. A barium meal and follow-through confirmed the diagnosis of SMA syndrome. She was managed conservatively with which she recovered uneventfully. Such late presentations are very uncommon. In addition, we have also briefly reviewed the pertinent literature. It is essential that we identify high risk patients preoperatively so that we could optimize them with proper intensive dietary supplementation. Postoperatively, a high index of suspicion needs to be retained to identify this syndrome at an early stage so that conservative management may be initiated with good clinical outcome. SMA syndrome can be potentially life threatening when the diagnosis is missed or delayed.

4.
Injury ; 47(6): 1276-81, 2016 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26975794

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Proximal tibiofibular joint (PTFJ) injuries are not uncommon but relatively understudied. This study evaluates the effectiveness of 2 radiographic methods in assessing the integrity of the PTFJ. STUDY DESIGN: This is a cross-sectional study of 2984 consecutive patients with knee X-rays done in a single institution over a 4-month period. A total of 5968 knee X-rays were assessed using 2 methods-[1] The direction in which the fibula points to in relation to the lateral femoral epicondyle on anteroposterior view and Blumensaat line on lateral view. [2] The degree of tibiofibular overlap as percentage of widest portion of the fibula head. Sensitivity and specificity of these methods in diagnosing a disrupted PTFJ are calculated. Variables including quality of X-rays, weight-bearing status of AP views and degree of knee flexion on lateral views are also recorded. Univariate analysis was carried out to investigate the association between variables using chi-square test for nominal data and student t-test for continuous data. RESULTS: The fibular points towards the lateral femoral epicondyle on AP view in 94.4% of the patients and points towards the posterior half of the Blumensaat line on lateral view in 98.1% of the patients. Using this method, weight-bearing X-rays are significantly associated with the direction the fibula is pointing (p<0.01) on the AP view and the degree of knee flexion is associated with the direction the fibula is pointing (p<0.01) on the lateral view. The AP tibiofibular overlap ranges from >0% to <75% in 94.1% of the patients and the lateral tibiofibular overlap ranges from >0% to <75% in 84.5% of the patients. This method is associated with whether true orthogonal X-rays of the knees are taken (p=0.048). CONCLUSION: The direction in which the fibula is pointing and the percentage of tibiofibular overlap are highly specific radiographic methods useful in defining the PTFJ. The first method requires a weight-bearing view on AP assessment and >20 degrees of flexion on lateral assessment. True orthogonal AP and lateral views are required for the second method to be used.


Assuntos
Fíbula/diagnóstico por imagem , Luxações Articulares/diagnóstico por imagem , Traumatismos do Joelho/diagnóstico por imagem , Articulação do Joelho/diagnóstico por imagem , Radiografia , Tíbia/diagnóstico por imagem , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Fíbula/lesões , Humanos , Luxações Articulares/fisiopatologia , Traumatismos do Joelho/fisiopatologia , Articulação do Joelho/anatomia & histologia , Articulação do Joelho/fisiopatologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Amplitude de Movimento Articular , Tíbia/lesões , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...