RESUMO
BACKGROUND: COVID-19 pandemic had tremendously affected all the aspects of human life during the past 3 years. In this study, we focused on kidney transplant patients' course from the COVID-19 diagnosis, immunosuppressive medication modification, hospitalization, and COVID-19 complications and how the COVID-19 infection affected the kidney and patients' quality of life during the hospitalization and after the discharge. MATERIAL AND METHOD: A retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database of all kidney transplants adult patients who had a positive COVID-19 PCR from 1 January 2020 to 30 December 2022, and had a history of kidney transplant at the SUNY Upstate Medical Hospital was done to identify the cases. RESULTS: 188 patients met the inclusion criteria and were included in the study. Based on the immunosuppressive regimen modification during COVID-19 infection, patients divided into two groups; in 143 (76%) patients, the immunosuppressive medication was reduced, and in 45 (24%) of patients, the immunosuppressive regimen continued as before during the COVID-19 infection. The mean time from the transplant to the diagnosis of COVID-19 was 67 months in the group we reduced the IM regimen, and 77 months in the group without changes in IM regimen. The mean recipients' age was 50.7 ± 12.9 years in the group we reduced the IM regimen, and 51.8 ± 16.4 years in the group without changes in IM regimen (P = 0.64). The vaccination rate against COVID-19 with at least 2 doses of either the CDC recommended Moderna or Pfizer vaccines was 80.2% in the group we reduced the IM regimen, and 84.8% in the group without changes in IM regimen (P = 0.55). The hospitalization rate due to COVID-19 related symptoms was 22.4% % in the group we reduced the IM regimen, and 35.5% in the group without changes in IM regimen (P = 0.12). However, the ICU admission rate was higher in the group we reduced the IM regimen, but the difference was not significant (26.5% Vs.6.25%, P = 0.12). 6 episodes of biopsy-proven rejection in the group with IM reduction was observed, which were 3 episodes of acute antibody-mediated rejections (ABMR) and 3 episodes of acute T-Cell-mediated rejections (TCMR), and 3 episodes in the group without any change in IM regimen, which were 2 episodes of ABMR and 1 episode of TCMR (P = 0.51). No significant difference was mentioned in the eGFR and serum creatinine after the comparison between the groups after 12 months of follow up. 124 patients responded to the post-COVID-19 questionnaires and were included in the data analysis. The response rate was 66%. Fatigue and exertion were the most reported symptom with a 43.9% prevalence. CONCLUSIONS: We found that immunosuppressive regimen minimization did not impact the kidney function in the long-term and it might be a helpful strategy to minimize the effect of COVID-19 infection on patients' condition during the hospital stay. With all the treatments, vaccinations, and precautions, still some patients did not achieve the complete recovery compared to their pre-COVID-19 health status. Fatigue was the main reported symptom amongst all the reported symptoms.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Belatacept has been demonstrated as an effective alternative immunosuppressant in kidney transplant recipients. This study focuses on outcomes of early and late conversion to Belatacept-based immunosuppression after kidney transplant. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database included all adult kidney transplants patients at SUNY Upstate Medical Hospital from 1 January 2014 to 30 December 2022. Early conversion was defined as all conversions done at <6 months after kidney transplantation, and late conversion to belatacept was defined as conversion at >6 months after kidney transplantation. RESULTS: Out of 61 patients included in this study, 33 patients (54%) were in the early conversion group, and 28 patients (46%) were in the late conversion group. The mean eGFR in the early conversion group was 26.73 ± 16.26 ml/min/1.73 m2 before conversion to belatacept, which improved to 45.3 ± 21.01 ml/min/1.73 m2 at one-year post-conversion (p = 0.0006). Furthermore, eGFR changes in the late conversion group were insignificant, with 46.30 ± 15.65 ml/min/1.73 m2 before conversion to belatacept, and 44.76 ± 22.91 ml/min/1.73 m2 after one year of follow-up (p = 0.72). All four biopsy-proven allograft rejections in the early conversion group were acute T-cell-mediated rejections (ATMR). In the late conversion group, out of three biopsy-proven rejections, one was chronic antibody-mediated rejection (CAMR), one was ATMR, and one was mixed ATMR/CAMR. All four patients with ATMR rejection received mycophenolic acid (MPA) as part of their immunosuppressive regimen, and none received tacrolimus. The one-year post-conversion allograft survival rate in early and late conversion groups was 100%. However, the one-year post-conversion patient survival rate was 90.9% in the early conversion group and 100% in the late conversion group (P = 0.11). CONCLUSIONS: Early post-transplant conversion to belatacept can improve the eGFR more meaningful when compared to late conversion. Patients who receive belatacept and MPA rather than tacrolimus may have increased rates of T-cell-mediated rejection.
