Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Hum Lact ; 38(1): 89-99, 2022 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33351689

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Breastfeeding is a fundamental component of health care, and health professionals need to be adequately prepared. As part of the system, health care professionals have the ability to influence the establishment and maintenance of breastfeeding. The global literature regarding the curricular approach or established best practices for health professional education in lactation is inconclusive and lacking in rigor. RESEARCH AIM: To explore the literature for the educational resources, methods, and curriculum used in the education of undergraduate health students related to lactation. METHODS: A scoping review examining the curricular programs of health professional students in lactation was undertaken exploring and summarizing evidence from peer reviewed and grey literature. A scoping review with a five-stage review process was followed. The database search between 1982-2018 generated 625 results, 79 full-text articles were reviewed, and 29 articles published in English met the inclusion criteria. RESULTS: In general, educational resources, methods, curricular approaches, and foundational topics were based on best practice standards. Some authors incorporated a variety of learning methods and provided experiential learning, with evidence of translation of knowledge into clinical practice. In the studies examined, researchers reported that students had improved their: knowledge and attitudes (59%); breastfeeding support skills (45%); and confidence (10%). However, even in programs that focused on developing students' breastfeeding support skills, authors reported a lack of change in students' confidence. CONCLUSIONS: Although only English articles met the inclusion criteria, this review was unique in its search of multidisciplinary, multilingual, and international studies. Consistency in teaching across disciplines is key and not evident in the studies reviewed.


Assuntos
Aleitamento Materno , Currículo , Feminino , Pessoal de Saúde/educação , Humanos , Lactação , Estudantes
2.
J Clin Psychiatry ; 80(1)2019 01 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30688418

RESUMO

Objective: eHealth interventions have been shown to be effective in improving anxiety among the general population. Despite the effectiveness of eHealth interventions for perinatal depression, a recent review reported mixed results for perinatal anxiety. The review, however, was not focused on anxiety, and studies with various designs were included. The aim of this systematic review is to summarize the evidence specific to anxiety and to conduct a meta-analysis to examine the effectiveness of eHealth interventions in reducing perinatal anxiety. Data Sources: MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, and PsycINFO were searched beginning with the date that the databases were available through March 2018 using keywords such as perinatal period, web-based interventions, and anxiety. Study Selection: Randomized controlled trials that were conducted during the perinatal period, examined the effectiveness of an eHealth mental health intervention, measured anxiety symptoms or disorders as a primary or secondary outcome, provided data on anxiety levels both pre-intervention and post-intervention, had a comparison group, and were published in English were included. A total of 770 articles were retrieved, and the full texts of 64 articles were reviewed. Five studies met the inclusion criteria, 4 of which fulfilled the quality criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. Data Extraction: Data were extracted using a data extraction form developed for this study. The Cochrane Collaboration's Review Manager software was used to conduct the meta-analysis. Results: The test for heterogeneity (I² = 0%; P = .80) suggested a homogeneous sample. The meta-analysis for the total effect size showed that at post-intervention, the eHealth group had significantly lower anxiety scores than the control group, with a standardized mean difference of -0.41 (95% CI, -0.71 to -0.11; P = .007). Conclusions: eHealth interventions are promising in improving perinatal anxiety. The content of these interventions should account for common comorbid mental health conditions during the perinatal period and provide opportunities to tailor further treatment if necessary.


Assuntos
Transtornos de Ansiedade , Complicações na Gravidez , Transtornos Puerperais , Telemedicina/métodos , Transtornos de Ansiedade/psicologia , Transtornos de Ansiedade/terapia , Feminino , Humanos , Assistência Perinatal/métodos , Gravidez , Complicações na Gravidez/psicologia , Complicações na Gravidez/terapia , Transtornos Puerperais/psicologia , Transtornos Puerperais/terapia , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...