Audiological outcomes of cochlear implantation in Ramathibodi Hospital.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the outcomes of the patients at 1-year post cochlear implantation emphasized on audiological outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHOD: Retrospective study of hearing response follow in three, six, and 12 months of 143 ears undergoing cochlear implantation between 1995 and 2009. Only 77 ears were found to have the completed data for analysis. Deaf patients were categorized into five groups in which they were operated by four different cochlear implant devices. The two parameters used to evaluate the outcomes included the aided response (AR), assessing the hearing threshold of cochlear implant user; and the Categories of Auditory Performance (CAP) which assess their auditory receptive abilities. RESULTS: Demographic data showed male:female ratio was 4:3. Age ranged from 2 to 68 years. Although the aided hearing threshold among five groups of deafness showed improvement without statistical difference, the auditory ability showed significance higher score in post-lingual than pre-lingual deaf patients (p < 0.05). Patients with aural communication prior to surgery also showed higher auditory ability than those without aural communication (p < 0.05). The outcomes of CAP were analyzed among patients operated with different cochlear implant devices. Users with Pulsar CI 100 Opus 2, HiRes 90K Auria, and HiRes 90 K Harmony showed better auditory ability than with Combi 40+ Tempo+. Both mean scores of AR and CAP were higher at six and 12 months than at three months. At 12 months the scores were higher than at six months (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Cochlear implant surgery resulted in good hearing, however the improvement of speech understanding need more time to practice. Patients using cochlear implant at 12 months showed more improvement of hearing and performance than those using for less than 12 months.

Fourteen-years experience with cochlear implantation in Ramathibodi Hospital.

OBJECTIVE: To review the cochlear implant program in Ramathibodi Hospital and share experience of cochlear implantation emphasized on clinical and surgical outcomes. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Retrospective review of 143 ears (140 patients) operated with cochlear implant between 1995 and 2009. The demographic data including etiology of deafness and findings from temporal bone CTscans were reviewed. The authors' experience with cochlear implant surgery in terms of patient selection, patient advisory clinic, necessary equipment, pre- and postoperative evaluations, surgical techniques and complications were discussed. RESULTS: Most congenital origin was unknown etiology and congenital rubella was the most common known cause. From the CT scans of congenital deafness, vestibular aqueduct dilatation was the most common and found in 29.31% while Mondini malformation was shown to be 16.37%. The authors' surgical technique of using the pocket method and designed bony ridge at cortical mastoid rim had helped stabilizing the implant and electrode fancoil. During the last two years, no complication or revision surgery was detected. CONCLUSION: Cochlear implant surgery in both children and adults can result in good surgical outcome and fewer complications under experienced surgeons and a good team.

Indication and surgical consideration of cochlear implantation at Ramathibodi Hospital.

OBJECTIVES: To demonstrate selection criteria for cochlear implant candidates as well as the outcome of quality of life (QoL) after cochlear implant surgery. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Retrospective review was performed of all cochlear implants at Ramathibodi Hospital. A total number of 33 cochlear implantations were performed during the period of 10 years from December 1995 to December 2005. Inclusion criteria were established and the audiological criteria were then evaluated using the electrical promontory stimulation test. The etiology of severe sensory neural hearing loss was detected. The CT scan and MRI of the inner ear were studied in the different causes of deafness. RESULTS: The main cause of deafness in the present study (16 adults and 17 children) was suffering from pregnancy rubella. The second one was familial congenital deafness. The CT scan studied in the rubella cases showed anatomical normal cochlea and the hereditary cause of deafness showed abnormal cochlea that caused a strong perilymphatic gusher in a 14 year- old boy. There were 16 cases of adolescent and adult patients who all had good response in the promontory stimulation test. The QoL post implantation was evaluated in regards to improvement in education and communication. CONCLUSION: Multi-channel cochlear implantation in severe profound hearing loss patients could improve the hearing in both normal and abnormal cochlea, congenital rubella deafness and the familial cause of deafness. The outcomes of the QoL after surgery were better in hearing detection, speech perception, school performance, communication and return to work.

Auditory performance of cochlear implant children aged 2-5 years.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the categories of auditory performance in prelingual deaf children after implantation. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective study MATERIAL AND METHOD: The present study consisted of one boy and four girls aged between 2 and 5 years old at the time of implantation. All subjects had bilateral profound sensorineural hearing loss and received no substantial benefit from amplification. Three subjects were implanted with Med-El combi 40+ with CIS strategy and two subjects received multichanal monopolar Nucleus 24 cochlear implant with ACE strategy. After implantation, all subjects undertook a program ofhabilitation at the Speech and Hearing Clinic Ramathibodi Hospital. The Categories of Auditory Performance (CAP) score was determined at regular intervals prior to implantation, immediately at the initial mapping (0) and 3, 6, 12 and 18 months after the implantation. RESULTS: The results showed that before implantation, only three children showed awareness of environment sounds, CAP score level 1, and that immediately after mapping, all of the children demonstrated awareness of the environmental sounds. Moreover, two of these children showed awareness of speech sounds, CAP score level 2. The CAP scores were gradually increased over a 12-month period. At the 12-month assessment interval, four children could discriminate two speech sounds, CAP score level 4 and one child understood phrases without lip reading, CAP score level 5. 18 months after of implantation, the CAP score for four children increased to level 5. One child understood conversation without lip reading with a familiar talker, CAP score level 6. Furthermore, children with congenital hearing loss who underwent implantation at a younger age received more benefit from the implantation. CONCLUSION: The CAP score was found to be a useful and sensitive tool to evaluate the outcome of auditory receptive abilities in young congenital deaf children who underwent cochlear implantation. The accessible outcome measurement will provide information for parents and professionals to obtain a hierarchical scale on which the children's auditory ability with other more formal measures may be inappropriate.

Pediatric cochlear implantation: experience in Thai patients.

OBJECTIVE: This study was to evaluate the result of cochlear implantation in Thai pediatric patients from 1999-2003. DESIGN: A prospective, open-labeled study. SETTING: University teaching hospital. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Long term surgical and audiologic results comparison after cochlear implantation in 2 cases with Mondini anomality, 7 normal cochlea cases and a case of post meningitis post lingual child. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Speech perception tests battery. RESULTS: Among 10 children, 8 were implanted with Nucleus 22/24; the other two were implanted with Med-el device system. The pre-operated cochlea in 2 cases showed Mondini deformity; both had gushers during the operation with a good outcome. The other 8 cases had normal cochlea although one was deaf from bacterial meningitis. There were 3 re-implantations. Speech production and perception was improved faster in the two children implanted with Med-el than those implanted with Nucleus devices. CONCLUSION: Cochlear implantation in Mondini cases can be successful in speech production and perception. Speech perception ability depended on the age of implantation and preoperative rehabilitation.