Outcomes in 125 individuals with adrenal incidentalomas from a single centre. a retrospective assessment of the 1 mg overnight and low dose dexamethasone suppression tests.

Adrenal masses discovered incidentally during imaging studies - adrenal incidentalomas (AIs) - are common and prompt investigations to exclude secretory lesions and malignancy. Their best management strategy is unknown. Our objectives were to identify all outcomes of AI investigation in a UK centre and to assess the performance of the 2 mg low dose (LDDST) and 1 mg overnight dexamethasone (ODST) suppression tests in this setting. Out of 125 patients referred to our centre between 2005 and 2009 with AIs, 16 (12.8%) were diagnosed with secretory adrenal adenomas. 24 patients (23%) failed to suppress on LDDST or ODST using a serum cortisol cut-off of 50 nmol/l for both tests; in 12 this was due to false positive results. 5 patients were diagnosed with adrenal Cushing's syndrome and 7 with subclinical hypercortisolism. The use of a higher post LDDST (83 nmol/l) or ODST (138 nmol/l) cortisol cut-off would have resulted in missing 1 patient with Cushing's syndrome and 4 with subclinical hypercortisolism or 2 patients with Cushing's syndrome and 1 with subclinical hypercortisolism, respectively. In patients who had both tests, the ODST systematically resulted in higher post-test cortisol values compared with the LDDST. The adenoma diameter correlated with and was predictive of the post LDDST cortisol. Our results indicate that altering the post dexamethasone cut-off in accordance to published guidelines changes the performance of the suppression tests. The ODST may result in higher post-test cortisol levels compared to LDDST when used in patients with AIs.

Performance of a third-generation TSH-receptor antibody in a UK clinic.

BACKGROUND: UK national guidelines recommend the measurement of TSH receptor antibodies (TRAb) in certain clinical scenarios. A commercial third-generation TRAb autoantibody M22-biotin ELISA assay was introduced in May 2008 in our centre. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of a TRAb assay in a retrospective and subsequently a prospective cohort in a UK centre. DESIGN: A retrospective review of patients with thyroid disease followed by a prospective observational study in consecutive patients with newly found suppressed serum thyrotrophin (TSH). PATIENTS AND MEASUREMENTS: Medical records of 200 consecutive patients with thyroid disorders who had TRAb measured since the introduction of the assay. In a prospective study 44 patients with newly identified hyperthyroidism (TSH < 0·02 mIU/l) had sera assayed for TRAb prior to their clinic appointment at which a final diagnosis was sought. RESULTS: In the retrospective cohort, the manufacturer's cut-off point of TRAb ≥0·4 U/l resulted in a positive predictive value (PPV) of 95%, sensitivity 85%, specificity 94% and negative predictive value (NVP) 79% to diagnose Graves' disease using defined criteria. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis determined an optimal cut-off point of TRAb ≥3·5 U/l with a 100% specificity to exclude patients without Graves' disease at the cost though of a lower sensitivity (43%). In the prospective study, the sensitivity, PPV, specificity and NPV were all 96% using the ≥0·4 U/l cut-off. When combining hyperthyroid patients from both cohorts the assay sensitivity and specificity at ≥0·4 U/l cut-off were 95% and 92% respectively. A positive TRAb result increased the probability of Graves' disease for a particular patient by 25-35% and only six (2·5%) patients had a diagnosis of hyperthyroidism of uncertain aetiology after TRAb testing. CONCLUSIONS: The assay studied specifically identifies patients with Graves' disease. It is a reliable tool in the initial clinical assessment to determine the aetiology of hyperthyroidism and has the potential for cost-savings.

HLA class II antibodies in transfusion-related acute lung injury (TRALI). A case report.

TRALI, a serious complication of blood transfusion, is underdiagnosed. Anti-granulocyte and anti-HLA class I molecules in donors or recipients and very recently, lipids in stored blood as well as anti-HLA class II have been associated with the syndrome. We present a TRALI case which occurred in a 56 year old woman after plasma transfusion. HLA class II antibodies were identified in the donor and were correlated with the recipients' HLA antigens. The presence of HLA class II antibodies without anti-HLA class I has been reported in very few cases and may facilitate the understanding of the pathogenesis of the syndrome.

Humoral sensitization against rejected grafts: specific antibodies to graft immunogenic amino acid triplets.

Humoral sensitization against immunogenic amino acid (aa) triplets expressed on a rejected graft was analyzed in 83 retransplant candidates. All patients had lost a graft with HLA-A,-B mismatches. The alloantibodies were detected by a complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) technique and an ELISA method in parallel; they were classified as HLA graft-specific (GS) and non-GS antibodies. The aa triplet specificity of the antibodies was assessed using the HLAMatchmaker algorithm. HLA class I antibodies were detected in 74 of 78 (94%) cases, including GS reactivity in 55 (74.3%) and non-GS in 72 (97.2%), either alone (n = 19) or in parallel with GS antibodies (n = 53). For all HLA-GS-antibody-reactive patients, we defined the specificity against immunogenic aa triplets on the previous graft. Moreover, antibodies specific to graft aa triplets were observed within the non-GS antibodies among 19 of 19 and 28 of 53 cases, respectively. Therefore, aa triplet-specific antibodies against the rejected graft were present in all 74 cases with HLA class I antibodies. Antibodies against aa triplets expressed on all HLA class I-mismatched graft antigens were present in 73% of cases. The high extent of humoral alloreactivity against a rejected graft supports the decision to avoid repeated exposure to immunogenic aa triplet mismatches on a second graft. An accurate analysis for performed antibodies in these cases may be beneficial to select the most suitable second donor.

HLA class I donor-specific triplet antibodies detected after renal transplantation.

The purpose of this study was to investigate whether IgG, non-donor-specific anti-HLA class I antibodies (HLAabI) detected after renal transplantation recognize immunogenic amino acid triplets expressed on the foreign graft. In addition, we sought to evaluate the effect of these antibodies as well as other posttransplant HLAabI on graft outcome. Posttransplant sera from 264 renal recipients were tested for the presence of IgG HLAabI and HLA class II-specific alloantibodies (HLAabII) by ELISA. The HLAMatchmaker computer algorithm was used to define the HLA class I non-donor-specific antibodies, which seem to recognize immunogenic amino acid triplets. Donor-specific triplet antibodies (DSTRab) were detected in 16 of 22 (72.7%) recipients based on at least one HLA-A or -B mismatched antigen with the donor. DSTRab were found either without (n = 7) or with (n = 9) HLA donor-specific antibodies (HLA-DSA). The presence of DSTRab alone in the periphery was associated with acute rejection, whereas the presence of both DSTRab and HLA-DSA was associated with chronic rejection and graft failure.

Definition of permissible and immunogenic HLA antigens based on epitope analysis of the HLA specific antibodies produced in sensitized patients.

The goal of this study was to develop an accurate protocol whereby detection of acceptable HLA-A and -B mismatches is based on epitope analysis of HLA class I specific antibodies detected in the serum of highly sensitized patients awaiting a kidney retransplant. A total of 400 serum samples from 44 highly sensitized patients with panel reactive antibodies (PRA) of > or = 60% were collected during a 3-year follow-up period. All patients had been sensitized from a previous graft. In order to define the specificities of the HLA class I specific antibodies, two techniques were used in parallel: the antihuman globulin augmented complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) technique and an enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay (ELISA) technique. Epitope identification was based on class I HLA antigen sequencing, where the unique epitope configuration on one HLA antigen represented the private epitope of the specific HLA antigen, and epitopes shared by more than one HLA antigen represented public determinants. The epitope prediction for the immunogenic HLA epitopes was based on an MHC database. For each highly sensitized patient, antibody specificities against actual and 'at risk' epitopes were defined. Following epitope analysis, all HLA antigens that did not express the actual and/or 'at risk' immunogenic epitopes were considered as acceptable mismatches of epitope analysis. The cytotoxicity of highly sensitized patients was determined using two different panels of selected, separated T lymphocytes. HLA class I specific IgG antibodies against 69 actual and 86 'at risk' epitopes were detected. In all patients, a large number of acceptable mismatches were defined. These included a large number of HLA antigens, corresponding to both HLA-A and -B loci. Our study introduces an accurate protocol for the detection of acceptable mismatches in highly sensitized patients. According to this protocol, the detailed description of immunogenic HLA specific epitope targets, against which HLA class I specific antibodies are directed, is a useful tool for the detection of acceptable mismatches in highly sensitized patients. This may lead to reduced production of HLA class I specific antibodies and, consequently, improved graft survival.

Epitope analysis of HLA class I donor specific antibodies in sensitized renal transplant recipients.

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to evaluate the epitope specificity of donor-specific HLA class I antibodies detected in the serum of alloimmunized from a previous renal graft patients. METHOD: A total of 410 serum samples from 87 patients who had lost a previous graft, were collected every 4 months during a 2-year follow-up period. All recipients and donors were typed for class I HLA-antigens by a standard lymphocytotoxicity technique. To define the specificities of the HLA class I antibodies, two techniques were used in parallel: the antihuman globulin augmented CDC (AHG-CDC) technique and an ELISA technique. The mismatched HLA-antigens and the detected HLA class I antibodies were categorized as intra-cross-reactive group mismatches (intra-CREGs-MMs) and other-CREG-MMs. For each sensitized patient actual and at risk epitope specificities were defined. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients (43.7%) had developed IgG HLA class I-specific antibodies with stable specificities against mismatched alloantigens from the previous graft. A total of 60 antibody reactivity patterns and 82 specificities against private and public epitope were recognized. Patients with only intra-CREGs-MMs produced HLA class I-specific antibodies less frequently than patients with only other-CREG-MMs, although the difference was nearly statistically significant (P=0.053). All HLA class I donor-specific antibodies were considered to have specificities against the private epitopes of the mismatched graft HLA-antigens. In the cases where HLA class I alloreactivity was spreading to more than one donor antigens, we considered that the detected antibodies had specificities against the private and the shared between the alloantigens epitope(s). No epitope-specific antibodies were detected against shared epitopes between the mismatched alloantigens and the HLA-antigens of the patients. In 11/38 cases (28.9%) HLA class I alloreactivity spreading to non-graft antigens was detected. These antibodies were directed against HLA-antigens that share epitope(s) and have strong serological reactivity with the immunogenic alloantigens. CONCLUSION: Our data show that a small number of private and public alloepitopes seem to be responsible for antibody production in patients sensitized from a previous graft. A detailed description of these HLA-epitopes, in the context of clinical graft complications, may lead to an improved organ allocation strategy.

A limited number of HLA epitopes are recognized from HLA class I-specific antibodies detected in the serum of sensitized patients.

The goal of this study was to evaluate the epitope specificity of HLA class I-specific antibodies detected in the serum of sensitized patients awaiting retransplantation. The study group consisted of 22 sensitized from previous graft patients, who produced stable IgG HLA class I-specific antibodies. A total of 60 serum samples were screened and analyzed by two techniques in parallel: the antihuman globulin augmented CDC (AHG-CDC) technique and an ELISA technique. All recipients and donors were typed for class I HLA antigens by a standard lymphocytotoxicity technique. The epitope identification was based on class I HLA antigens sequencing, where the multiple immunogenic epitopes are differentially shared among various HLA antigens. The unique epitope configuration on one HLA antigen represents the private epitope of the specific HLA antigen while epitopes shared by more than one HLA antigen represent public determinants. In some HLA antigens (HLA-A1), more than one private epitope has been defined, while in others (HLA-B35, -B51), the private epitopes are not yet known. In a total of 36 antibody reactivity patterns, the majority of the definable IgG HLA class I-specific antibodies corresponded to the A-locus (75%), and only 25% had specificities against the B-locus antigens, although the number of incompatibilities concerning both loci were almost identical (29 for the HLA antigens of the A-locus and 26 for those of B-locus). All patients produced HLA class I-specific antibodies with specificities against the private epitopes of the immunogenic mismatched HLA antigen(s). In 6/21 cases (28.6%), HLA class I alloreactivity spreading to nongraft HLA antigens was detected and 9 public (shared) immunogenic alloepitopes were recognized. In conclusion, appling the epitope analysis of HLA class I-specific antibodies produced by sensitized from previous graft patients, we were able to define the immunogenic alloepitopes. We consider that the immunogenic alloepitopes, during transplantation course, are mainly private epitopes of mismatched HLA antigens and, in certain cases, shared epitopes between the donor alloantigens and other HLA antigens. This knowledge may offer the potential of transplanting sensitized patients through improved donor selection.

Assignment of HLA-antigens in CREGs facilitates the detection of acceptable mismatches in highly sensitized patients.

The purpose of this study was to investigate whether in highly sensitized patients (HSPs) the acceptable HLA-A and -B mismatches (AMs) can be predicted on the basis of patients' HLA-phenotype. To this affect, 1000 historical serum samples obtained from 50 HSPs (PRA > 60%), panel reactive antibodies (PRA) value and the specificity of class I anti-HLA-antibodies were detected by two techniques in parallel: An anti-human globulin augmented cytotoxicity (AHG-CDC) and an Elisa technique. Thereafter, class I HLA-antigens of the nonreactive cells in the screening panel and class I HLA-antigens of the patients were assigned to CREGs. The AMs for each one of the patients were detected using a separate cell panel, which was prepared in a way to include almost all the HLA-antigens belonging to the CREGs of the patients as well as to those of the nonreactive cells in the screening panel. It was found that the AMs in HSPs, detected with this protocol were more, compared to those we usually detect using only the HLA-antigens of the nonreactive cells in the screening panel (up to 8 versus 2-5). Both, the definitively detected AMs, and the HLA-specificities of the nonreactive cells of the screening panel belonged to the same CREGs. These CREGs were equivalent to the CREGs of class I HLA-phenotypes of each patient. The data presented in this paper introduce a new, rapid and easier way for the detection of AMs in HSPs. According to this proposed protocol, the assignment of patients' standard class I private HLA-phenotypes in CREGs, not only greatly facilitates the detection of AMs, but the detected AMs are also in fact significantly more than those determined by the conventional methodology. We have also confirmed that the majority of antibodies induced by HLA alloimmunization are directed against mismatched shared or public group epitopes CREGs. Moreover, we have confirmed that prospective matching for major CREGs would be feasible on a national level and would not significantly prolong waiting time, which could result in a significant augmentation of the potential donor pool.