Association between extrinsic and intrinsic carpal ligament injuries at MR arthrography and carpal instability at radiography: initial observations.

PURPOSE: To retrospectively compare the presence or absence of carpal instability on radiographs with the findings of magnetic resonance (MR) arthrographic evaluation of intrinsic and extrinsic ligament tears in patients with chronic wrist pain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The institutional review board approved this study and did not require informed consent. Signs of carpal instability were assessed on static and dynamic radiographs of the wrist obtained in 72 patients (24 female, 48 male; mean age, 36 years; age range, 14-59 years) with posttraumatic wrist pain. MR arthrography was subsequently performed. Two musculoskeletal radiologists independently analyzed the radiographs and MR images. Each intrinsic and extrinsic ligament was individually evaluated for the presence of a ligament tear. The extent of the tear also was recorded. Interobserver agreement regarding MR arthrographic findings was tested by calculating kappa statistics. Statistical comparison between radiography and MR arthrography was performed by using the Fisher exact test. RESULTS: Twenty-five triangular fibrocartilage complex, 18 (five partial, 13 complete) scapholunate ligament, and 25 (10 partial, 15 complete) lunotriquetral ligament tears were visualized. Twenty-two (all complete) extrinsic ligament tears were detected: two radial collateral ligament, 10 radioscaphocapitate ligament, and 10 radiolunotriquetral ligament tears. Interobserver agreement regarding intrinsic and extrinsic ligament tear detection at MR arthrography was excellent (kappa = 0.80). Nineteen patients had evidence of carpal instability on radiographs. Fourteen (52%) of 27 patients with at least one complete intrinsic lesion had no sign of carpal instability. On the other hand, the association of scapholunate ligament and/or lunotriquetral ligament and extrinsic ligament tears was significantly correlated (P < .001) with carpal instability at radiography. CONCLUSION: The presence or absence of carpal instability on radiographs depends on the association between intrinsic and extrinsic ligament tears-even partial ones-rather than on the presence of intrinsic ligament tears alone, even when the tears are complete.

MR imaging of the metacarpophalangeal joints of the fingers: evaluation of 38 patients with chronic joint disability.

OBJECTIVE: To report the MR imaging findings of painful injured metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints of the fingers. DESIGN AND PATIENTS: MR imaging of 39 injured MCP joints in 38 patients was performed after a mean delay of 8.8 months. The MR images were obtained with the fingers in extended and flexed positions using T2-weighted and T1-weighted sequences before and after intravenous injection of a gadolinium compound. Ten patients were treated surgically. Mean clinical follow-up was 1.8 years. RESULTS: Tears of the collateral ligaments were the most common lesion (30/39), most being radial in location. Contrast-enhanced axial T1-weighted images with the MCP joint in a flexed position showed these lesions optimally. Ten tears were partial and 20 were complete. In 13 patients, MR images showed 17 associated lesions including injuries of the extensor hood (10/17), interosseous tendon (3/17), palmar plate (3/17), and an osteochondral lesion (1/17). Sagittal MR images were essential to highlight palmar plate tears. CONCLUSION: Partial or complete tears of the collateral ligaments are prevalent MR imaging findings in patients with chronic disability resulting from injuries to the MCP joints. Although conservative treatment generally is sufficient for isolated injuries of the collateral ligaments, surgical repair is often required in cases of more extensive injuries. MR imaging may clearly delineate associated lesions of and about the MCP joints.

Lesser metatarsophalangeal joints: standard MR imaging, MR arthrography, and MR bursography--initial results in 48 cadaveric joints.

PURPOSE: To delineate the normal magnetic resonance (MR) imaging anatomy of the lesser metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joints in a cadaveric model and compare the MR arthrographic and MR bursographic findings with the standard MR imaging findings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: T1-weighted spin-echo MR imaging of 48 lesser MTP joints of 12 cadaveric feet was performed. The specimens were subsequently evaluated with MR arthrography, MR bursography, or both examinations. Musculoskeletal radiologists evaluated standard MR images to determine the normal appearances of the joint structures, especially the fibrous capsule, plantar plate, and collateral ligament complex (CLC). Signal intensity, morphology, joint thickness, relationships with adjacent structures, and best plane for analysis were analyzed. The contrast material-enhanced (ie, arthrographic and bursographic) MR imaging findings were compared with the standard MR imaging findings. RESULTS: The coronal plane was best for simultaneous depiction of the fibrous capsule, plantar plate, and collateral ligament complex and for assessment of the relationship between the CLC and the plantar plate. The sagittal plane was best for analysis of the bone attachments of the plantar plate and the transverse plane for evaluation of the CLC attachment sites in the phalanges. MR arthrography enabled identification of the bare areas and recesses of the joints, better delineation of the plantar plate articular surface, and better evaluation of the integrity of the soft-tissue components of the joints. Compared with the other examinations, MR bursography did not help improve these evaluations. CONCLUSION: MR imaging is an excellent examination for delineating the anatomy of the lesser MTP joints. Compared with standard MR imaging, only MR arthrography helps improve visualization of the fibrous capsule, plantar plate, and CLC of the lesser MTP joints.

Extrinsic carpal ligaments: normal MR arthrographic appearance in cadavers.

PURPOSE: To describe the normal magnetic resonance (MR) arthrographic anatomy of the major carpal ligaments (excluding scapholunate and lunotriquetral ligaments) and their osseous attachments by using standard imaging planes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MR images of 22 wrists derived from fresh human cadaveric hands were obtained after tricompartmental arthrography. The MR arthrographic appearance of the carpal ligaments and their bone attachments were analyzed and correlated to those seen on anatomic sections. Two readers determined in consensus which was the best plane to observe the course and attachment sites for each ligament. They further analyzed the size and sites of attachment of these ligaments in two orthogonal planes chosen for optimal viewing. RESULTS: Each ligament was well seen as a hypointense linear structure with MR arthrography. The radioscaphocapitate, radiolunotriquetral, radioscapholunate, dorsal radiotriquetral, palmar scaphotriquetral, and dorsal scaphotriquetral ligaments were best evaluated in the transverse plane. The palmar and dorsal ulnotriquetral and ulnolunate ligaments were best visualized in the sagittal plane. The radial collateral ligament was best analyzed in the coronal plane. The attachment sites of all ligaments were best analyzed either in the transverse or sagittal planes. CONCLUSION: MR arthrography allows visualization of the carpal ligaments. Detailed knowledge of the normal appearance of these ligaments can serve as a baseline for future studies in which MR arthrography is used to characterize wrist instability.

Metatarsophalangeal joint of the great toe: normal MR, MR arthrographic, and MR bursographic findings in cadavers.

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the normal anatomy of the metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint of the great toe with MR imaging, MR arthrography, and MR bursography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MR images of 12 cadaveric MTP joints of the great toe were obtained before and after arthrography, busography, or both. The MR appearances of all articular and periarticular structures were analyzed and correlated with those seen on anatomic sections. RESULTS: The sesamoid bones and ligaments, the deep transverse metatarsal ligament, and the tendon attachments of the abductor and adductor hallucis muscles were seen best in the coronal plane. The sagittal plane was best for evaluating the plantar plate, the articular cartilage, and the tendon attachments of the flexor and extensor hallucis brevis muscles. The main collateral ligaments were evaluated best in the axial plane. MR arthrography improved the visualization of all articular and periarticular structures except the collateral ligament complexes. MR bursography did not enhance the visualization of these structures. CONCLUSIONS: MR imaging and MR arthrography allow accurate visualization of the important anatomic structures in and about the MTP joint of the great toe.

Recurrent glomus tumors of fingertips: MR imaging evaluation.

PURPOSE: To determine the magnetic resonance (MR) imaging findings in recurrent glomus tumors of the fingertips. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-four consecutive patients with recurrent pain after previous excision of a glomus tumor of the fingertip underwent MR imaging studies and surgery. T1-weighted spin-echo MR images were obtained in each patient before and after intravenous injection of contrast material; T2-weighted spin-echo and three-dimensional gradient-recalled echo images were also obtained. MR angiography was performed in four patients. Postsurgical histopathologic analysis revealed recurrent glomus tumors in 22 patients. Signal intensity, enhancement, and margins of the scar tissue and the recurrent tumors at MR were assessed. RESULTS: The postsurgical scars were depicted in 21 (88%) of 24 patients with all sequences but were best demonstrated on gradient-recalled echo MR images. Seven patients had undergone multiple surgical procedures and had extensive scar tissue and, in one case, a neuroma. In all patients, MR imaging revealed a nodule compatible with the diagnosis of a recurrent glomus tumor. In 13 (54%) of 24 patients, the nodule had typical features of a glomus tumor. In eight (33%) of 24 patients, the tumors had low signal intensity or isointensity compared with the nail bed on T2-weighted images. In six (25%) of 24 patients, the tumors had faint enhancement after intravenous gadolinium chelate administration. The margins of the tumors were blurred by scar tissue in nine of 24 cases. CONCLUSION: MR imaging can aid in the evaluation of recurrent glomus tumors.

Pisotriquetral joint: assessment with MR imaging and MR arthrography.

PURPOSE: To evaluate magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and MR arthrographic findings in the pisotriquetral joint (PTJ) and their contribution to assessment of PTJ osteoarthritis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Images of 22 fresh human cadaveric PTJs were obtained with both conventional and arthrographic MR techniques. The MR appearances of all intraarticular and periarticular structures were analyzed and correlated with anatomic slices. Two readers graded visibility of anatomic structures and severity of joint abnormalities. Differences in the visibility ratings at standard MR imaging and at MR arthrography were calculated. Association between the type of pisiform insertion of ligament or muscle with cartilaginous abnormalities of the PTJ was assessed. The association between cartilaginous lesions and osteoarthritic changes was calculated. RESULTS: The tendon sheath, the fibrous capsule, and cartilaginous surfaces were better visualized at MR arthrography than at MR imaging. Pisohamate and pisometacarpal ligaments were slightly better seen on MR arthrograms. Tendons, muscles, and retinacular structures were well demonstrated at both conventional MR and MR arthrography. Cartilaginous lesions and osteophytes were easily identified and were detected more often in the pisiform bone than in the triquetral bone. Communication of the PTJ with the radiocarpal joint was noted in 18 (82%) of 22 wrists. CONCLUSION: MR imaging and/or MR arthrography allows visualization of all anatomic structures of the PTJ. MR arthrography improves visualization of findings of osteoarthritis.

Ligamentous and tendinous anatomy of the intermetacarpal and common carpometacarpal joints: evaluation with MR imaging and MR arthrography.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this work was to demonstrate the normal ligamentous and tendinous anatomy of the intermetacarpal (IMC) and common carpometacarpal (CCMC) joints with MRI and MR arthrography. METHOD: MR images of 22 wrists derived from fresh human cadavers were obtained before and after arthrography. The MR imaging features of the ligaments and tendons about the CCMC and IMC joints and the joints themselves were analyzed in a randomized fashion and correlated with those seen on anatomic sections. RESULTS: Six CCMC ligaments were visualized. The dorsal and palmar CCMC ligaments and the pisometacarpal ligament were best visualized in the sagittal plane. The radial and ulnar CCMC collateral ligaments and the capito-third metacarpal ligament were best visualized in the coronal plane. Three main IMC ligaments were observed: a dorsal and a palmar ligament and an interosseous ligament complex. All three ligaments were best visualized in the axial plane. Four tendinous insertions to the metacarpal bases were evident. CONCLUSION: The anatomy of the ligaments and tendinous insertions about the second to fifth IMC and the CCMC joints is well demonstrated by MR imaging and MR arthrography. MR arthrography does not significantly improve the visualization of these complex structures.

MR imaging of the metacarpophalangeal joints of the fingers: part I. Conventional MR imaging and MR arthrographic findings in cadavers.

PURPOSE: To demonstrate the normal anatomy of the metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints of the fingers with magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and MR arthrography in cadavers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MR images of 20 MCP joints of the fingers of five fresh human cadaveric hands in the extended and flexed positions were obtained before and after arthrography. The MR appearances of all articular and periarticular structures were analyzed and compared with those seen on anatomic sections. Two readers independently graded the visibility of these structures. Interobserver agreement was tested by using the kappa statistic. RESULTS: The main collateral ligaments could be best evaluated on the transverse images of flexed fingers. The accessory bands of the collateral ligament complex were best seen on the transverse images of extended fingers. Sagittal MR images were best for evaluating the palmar plate and the capsule. MR arthrography improved the visualization of all articular and periarticular structures. The kappa values related to conventional MR imaging findings at all sequences, 0.42-0.71, indicated moderate to substantial agreement. The kappa values for the MR arthrographic sequences, 0.59-0.74, were slightly higher than those for the nonenhanced sequences. CONCLUSION: Conventional MR imaging and MR arthrography enable accurate visualization of the important anatomic structures of the MCP joints. MR arthrography enhances visualization of the intraarticular elements.

MR imaging of the metacarpophalangeal joints of the fingers: part II. Detection of simulated injuries in cadavers.

PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare conventional magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and MR arthrography in the diagnosis of the most common traumatic metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint injuries, which were created surgically in cadavers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Injuries to various MCP joint structures were surgically created randomly in 28 fingers of seven human cadaveric hands. Injuries to the main collateral ligaments (CLs) (n = 12), accessory CL (n = 15), sagittal band (n = 14), transverse fibers of the extensor hood (n = 5), first annular pulley (n = 16), deep transverse metacarpal ligament (DTML) (n = 5), and palmar plate (n = 10) were analyzed. Conventional MR images and MR arthrograms were evaluated, with differences in interpretation resolved in consensus. The sensitivities, specificities, and accuracies of both MR imaging methods were determined, and the differences were tested for significance by using the McNemar test. RESULTS: Sensitivity was 28.6%-93.8% with conventional MR imaging versus 50.0%-93.3% with MR arthrography. Specificity was 66.7%-100% with conventional MR imaging versus 83.3%-100% with MR arthrography. Although the MR arthrographic results usually were higher, the differences were not significant. The kappa values for interobserver agreement were 0.314-0.638 for conventional MR imaging versus 0.364-1.00 for MR arthrography. Sensitivity for the detection of lesions of the main and accessory CLs and the first annular pulley was slightly higher than that for the detection of lesions of the extensor hood, DTML, and palmar plate structures. CONCLUSION: MR imaging and MR arthrography enable the diagnosis of simulated MCP joint injuries. MR arthrography does not have a significant advantage over conventional MR imaging.