A single arm, prospective, open label, multicentre study for evaluation of efficacy and safety of IV CERA for treatment of chronic renal anaemia in dialysis patients not currently treated with ESA.

INTRODUCTION: CERA, a continuous erythropoietin receptor activator, has reported effective correction of anaemia in international clinical trials. OBJECTIVE: Objective of this study was to evaluate efficacy and safety of CERA in Indian patients who were on dialysis and has not received erythropoiesis stimulating agent (ESA) therapy in last 8 weeks. METHODS: In this open label, single arm, prospective, multi-centre study, 189 patients on dialysis, having Haemoglobin (Hb) between 8 - 10 g/dL and not receiving any ESA for last 8 weeks were included at 14 centers across India. CERA was given intravenous (IV) at the dose of 0.6 microg/kg every two weeks. Primary end point of the study was mean change in Hb concentration from baseline to end of the treatment period (TP) of 16 weeks. RESULTS: Mean change of Hb from baseline to end of TP was 2.11 +/- 1.37 g/dL and 2.08 +/- 1.29 g/dL in intent to treat (ITT) and per protocol (PP) population respectively. Mean time to achieve Hb response was 6.10 +/- 3.87 weeks and 6.16 +/- 3.92 weeks in ITT and PP populations respectively. Out of 68 adverse events (AEs) seen during study period, 33 were serious adverse events (SAEs). As per investigators all SAEs were related to underlying disease and not to the study medication. CONCLUSION: It is concluded that CERA administered once in two weeks in dialysis patients effectively corrected chronic kidney disease (CKD) related anaemia and was well tolerated with no significant untoward effect directly related to drug therapy in Indian population.

Conversion from mycophenolate mofetil to enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium in renal transplant recipients with gastrointestinal tract disorders.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this prospective study was to evaluate the effect of conversion from mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) to enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS) in renal transplant recipients with gastrointestinal tract (GI) reverse effects using patient-reported outcomes instrument. METHODS: A multicenter, open-label, prospective study was undertaken in renal transplant recipients treated with MMF. In patients experiencing GI tract symptoms, treatment was changed to equimolar EC-MPS (myfortic). At baseline and visit 2 (4-6 weeks after baseline), patients completed the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) and Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI), and physicians completed the Overall Treatment Effect (OTE) scale at visit 2. A difference of 0.5 or greater in the OTE score is indicative of clinical relevance. RESULTS: Of 154 patients screened, 118 fulfilled the inclusion or exclusion criteria. Eighty-five men and 33 women with a mean age of 41.6 years participated in this study. Median time since transplantation was 12 months. Mean (SD) dose of MMF reported at baseline was 1209.4 (422.89) mg/d. More than 50% of patients reported MMF-associated nausea, dyspepsia, and abdominal pain. After conversion to an equimolar dose of EC-MPS, patients showed improvement in GI symptoms. This benefit was predominantly observed in patients with moderate to severe symptoms at baseline. On the GSRS, patients reported a significant (P < .05) reduction in symptom burden across all parameters (reflux, 36%; diarrhea, 38%; indigestion, 36%; constipation, 28%; and abdominal pain, 40%). On the GIQLI also, significant (P < .05) improvement was reported (symptoms, 18%; emotional status, 22%; physical functioning, 21%, and use of medical treatment, 18%). On the OTE scale, 84.7% of patients reported improvement in GI symptoms. CONCLUSION: In patients with moderate to severe GI symptoms, changing treatment from MMF to EC-MPS significantly reduces GI-related symptom burden and improves GI-specific quality of life.