Trial of Minocycline in a Clinically Isolated Syndrome of Multiple Sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: On the basis of encouraging preliminary results, we conducted a randomized, controlled trial to determine whether minocycline reduces the risk of conversion from a first demyelinating event (also known as a clinically isolated syndrome) to multiple sclerosis. METHODS: During the period from January 2009 through July 2013, we randomly assigned participants who had had their first demyelinating symptoms within the previous 180 days to receive either 100 mg of minocycline, administered orally twice daily, or placebo. Administration of minocycline or placebo was continued until a diagnosis of multiple sclerosis was established or until 24 months after randomization, whichever came first. The primary outcome was conversion to multiple sclerosis (diagnosed on the basis of the 2005 McDonald criteria) within 6 months after randomization. Secondary outcomes included conversion to multiple sclerosis within 24 months after randomization and changes on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 6 months and 24 months (change in lesion volume on T2-weighted MRI, cumulative number of new lesions enhanced on T1-weighted MRI ["enhancing lesions"], and cumulative combined number of unique lesions [new enhancing lesions on T1-weighted MRI plus new and newly enlarged lesions on T2-weighted MRI]). RESULTS: A total of 142 eligible participants underwent randomization at 12 Canadian multiple sclerosis clinics; 72 participants were assigned to the minocycline group and 70 to the placebo group. The mean age of the participants was 35.8 years, and 68.3% were women. The unadjusted risk of conversion to multiple sclerosis within 6 months after randomization was 61.0% in the placebo group and 33.4% in the minocycline group, a difference of 27.6 percentage points (95% confidence interval [CI], 11.4 to 43.9; P=0.001). After adjustment for the number of enhancing lesions at baseline, the difference in the risk of conversion to multiple sclerosis within 6 months after randomization was 18.5 percentage points (95% CI, 3.7 to 33.3; P=0.01); the unadjusted risk difference was not significant at the 24-month secondary outcome time point (P=0.06). All secondary MRI outcomes favored minocycline over placebo at 6 months but not at 24 months. Trial withdrawals and adverse events of rash, dizziness, and dental discoloration were more frequent among participants who received minocycline than among those who received placebo. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of conversion from a clinically isolated syndrome to multiple sclerosis was significantly lower with minocycline than with placebo over 6 months but not over 24 months. (Funded by the Multiple Sclerosis Society of Canada; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00666887 .).

A novel duplication confirms the involvement of 5q23.2 in autosomal dominant leukodystrophy.

OBJECTIVE: To identify the underlying locus and disease-causing mutation for adult-onset autosomal dominant leukodystrophy (ADLD). DESIGN: Previously, an adult-onset ADLD locus on chromosome 5q23 was mapped between markers D5S1495 and CTT/CCT15. This region contains 13 known and putative candidate genes. A 2-point linkage analysis confirmed linkage of a large multigenerational French Canadian family to chromosome 5q23. In addition, screening of the 13 genes within the candidate interval as well as 5 neighboring genes was completed, followed by comparative genomic hybridization. SUBJECTS: A multigenerational French Canadian family with ADLD mimicking progressive multiple sclerosis was identified and studied. Eight affected family members were available for the study and presented with autonomic dysfunction as well as upper motorneuron signs affecting gait. RESULTS: The thorough candidate gene approach did not identify any mutation. Consequently, a whole-chromosome comparative genomic hybridization for chromosome 5 identified a 280-kilobase duplication within the chromosomal band 5q23.2 in 2 affected individuals. This duplication contains 3 genes: LMNB1, FLJ36242, and MARCH3. CONCLUSION: We have identified a novel duplication on chromosomal band 5q23.2 in a French Canadian family with ADLD that supports the implication of duplicated LMNB1 as the disease-causing mutation. However, additional functional studies of lamin B1 overexpression are necessary to elucidate the involvement of lamin B1 in myelination and in degenerative disorders such as ADLD and multiple sclerosis.

Divalproex extended-release versus the original divalproex tablet: results of a randomized, crossover study of well-controlled epileptic patients with primary generalized seizures.

PURPOSE: To compare the safety and efficacy of two formulations of divalproex, extended-release divalproex versus the original divalproex tablet, in adolescent and adult patients with epilepsy. METHODS: Eligible patients were between the ages of 12 and 65 years with primary generalized epilepsy, which was controlled over the month prior to study enrollment with divalproex or valproic acid 1000 mg to 2000 mg/day. The patients were well-controlled; 39 of 43 (91%) had no seizures in the previous year. Patients were randomized to receive 84 days of either divalproex two times a day (b.i.d.)/three times a day (t.i.d.) or extended-release divalproex qd and then (crossed over to) 84 days of the comparator formulation. During the two treatment periods, patients received the same daily dose equivalent of divalproex as was taken during the month prior to study entry. The clinical status of patients was evaluated at a screening visit and at four subsequent visits conducted every 42 days. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference between the formulation groups for seizure control rate (95% [41/43] for divalproex and 93% [40/43] for extended-release divalproex). Likewise, the formulation groups were similar based on the incidence of treatment-related adverse events. The most frequently reported (< or =11.4% for either formulation) treatment-related adverse events were asthenia, tremor, nausea, and dizziness. CONCLUSIONS: Extended-release divalproex was similar to divalproex for the treatment of well-controlled, primary generalized epilepsy in terms of overall safety and efficacy parameters.