The immunogenicity and reactogenicity profile of a candidate hepatitis B vaccine in an adult vaccine non-responder population.

Approximately 5% of vaccinees display an inadequate response after the administration of the standard three dose hepatitis B vaccine. A new hepatitis B vaccine (HBsAg/AS04) formulated with the adjuvant AS04 which contains 3'-deacylated monophosphoryl lipid A (3D-MPL) and alum has been developed. AS04 enhances the immune response which may be beneficial to non-responders. In a single-blind, randomised study, we tested the immunogenicity and reactogenicity of the new vaccine with that of commercially established hepatitis B vaccine, both on a 0, 1, 6 months schedule in 20-60 years old non-responders (titre <10 m IU/ml after four doses of hepatitis B vaccine). One month after the first dose the seroprotection rate was 44% for group 1 (58 subjects) receiving the established vaccine versus 66% for group 2 receiving HBsAg/AS04 (57 subjects) (P=0.03). One month after the second dose this was 58 and 81%, respectively (P<0.005) and 1 month after the third dose this was 68 and 98%, respectively (P<0.001). One month after each dose, GMTs were 34, 56 and 111 mIU/ml for group 1 versus 123222 and 1937 mIU/ml for the HBsAg/AS04 group (P<0.05, <0.01 and 0.0001, respectively). Pain at the injection site was the most commonly reported local symptom and very few symptoms were scored as severe. In this group of adult non-responders to previous hepatitis vaccination, the HBsAg/AS04 vaccine was well tolerated and induced, at all time-points, a superior immune response compared to the licensed hepatitis B vaccine.

A prophylactic hepatitis B vaccine with a novel adjuvant system.

Studies with recombinant hepatitis B vaccines show seroprotection rates varying between 91 and 100%. Thus, a limited risk may remain for non-responding populations (e.g. non-responders, haemodialysis patients, elderly) who could benefit from a more immunogenic hepatitis B vaccine. One strategy to enhance the immune response is the use of novel adjuvants. SmithKline Beecham has developed a new adjuvant system containing alum and 3-deacylated monophosphoryl lipid A: SBAS4 (SmithKline Beecham Adjuvant System 4). Pilot studies showed that SBAS4 improved in vivo humoral and in vitro cellular immune responses compared to the response to classical recombinant hepatitis B vaccines and was safe and well-tolerated. Several studies assessed the profile of the HBsAg/SBAS4 vaccine in a healthy population, non-responders or elderly. In general the HBsAg/SBAS4 vaccine was well tolerated. Compared to an established recombinant hepatitis B vaccine, we observed an increased local reactogenicity but few symptoms were reported as severe. The HBsAg/SBAS4 vaccine elicits a strong immune response: subjects are protected faster and the GMTs are usually much higher. HBsAg/SBAS4 thus has the potential to protect those subjects who fail to be protected by well established hepatitis B vaccines.

Immunization against hepatitis A in the first year of life: priming despite the presence of maternal antibody.

BACKGROUND: Maternal antibodies interfere with hepatitis A vaccination in young infants. We examined the response to a high dose hepatitis A vaccine administered concomitantly with a combination of diphtheria-tetanus toxoids-acellular pertussis-inactivated poliovirus vaccine/Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccine to initially seropositive vs. initially seronegative infants. METHODS: Three hundred subjects were originally planned to be enrolled at age 6 to 10 weeks and received hepatitis A vaccine (formalin-inactivated vaccine, SB-Bio, 720 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay units) at 2, 4 and 6 months concomitantly with a diphtheria-tetanus toxoids-acellular pertussis-inactivated poliovirus vaccine/H. influenzae type b vaccine. Children initially seropositive received a booster dose at 12 months of age. An additional 100 twelve-month-old infants previously not vaccinated with hepatitis A vaccine were given 1 dose, to observe the primary response at that age. Reactogenicity was recorded on diary cards for the 3 subsequent days. Immunogenicity was measured at Months 2, 4, 5, 10 and 11 after administration of the first vaccine dose. For the subjects enrolled at 12 months, blood was drawn before and 1 month after the first vaccination. RESULTS: Of 297 initially enrolled infants 36% were seronegative before vaccination (Group A). The geometric mean concentration (GMC) (milli-International Units/ml) of the seropositive infants (Group B) before immunization was 2587. The GMCs of Group A infants 1 month after each dose and at 12 months of age were 93, 518, 1656 and 786, respectively. For Group B infants, the respective GMCs were 1165, 460, 508 and 167. One hundred subjects of Group B received a booster dose at age 12 months; at Month 13 all were seropositive with a GMC of 1902. For comparison, a third group of 100 not previously immunized 12-month-old infants (Group C) were enrolled and received 1 dose of hepatitis A vaccine with pre- and postimmunization GMCs of 52 and 120, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that the initially seropositive infants were primed despite maternal antibody interference. The hepatitis A vaccine was well-tolerated in this population of young infants.

A hepatitis B vaccine formulated with a novel adjuvant system.

Although more than 95% of the vaccinated population responds to the currently licensed vaccines against hepatitis B, some groups were found to be low responders. Lipid A as adjuvant, through its ability to activate macrophages, might improve humoral as well as cellular immune response. Therefore we evaluated the profile of a hepatitis B vaccine with the new adjuvant system SBAS4. 150 young adults were enrolled and randomized into three groups: one received the SBAS4 hepatitis B vaccine, the second Engerix-B(TM) and the third a hepatitis B vaccine with an alternative formulation on alum. Vaccinations were at 0 and 6 months. The vaccine was well tolerated. At month 7 all vaccinees were protected but with significant differences in GMTs between groups: 13,271 mIU/ml for the SBAS4 group versus 1203 and 1823 mIU/ml. Hence the hepatitis B vaccine with the new adjuvant system is more immunogenic compared to the other vaccines containing the same antigen and could be suitable for a two dose schedule.

Comparison of the reactogenicity and immunogenicity of a two injection combined high-dose hepatitis A and hepatitis B vaccine to those of Twinrix.

Twinrix (SmithKline Beecham Biologicals) is a combined hepatitis A and B vaccine licensed with a three-dose schedule. A two-dose combined hepatitis A and B vaccine would facilitate immunisation programs. In this prospective study, 100 healthy adults, aged between 18 and 40, were enrolled. A first group of 50 was given a high-dose vaccine at month 0 and 6. A second group of 50 received Twinrix at month 0, 1 and 6. The reactogenicity was assessed after each vaccine dose. There were no severe local adverse events. Seven severe systemic reactions occurred, of which five were fatigue, one was headache and one consist in gastrointestinal symptoms. They all resolved during the 4-day follow-up period. One serious general adverse event was reported, but was clearly unrelated to the vaccine. Thus, both vaccines were well tolerated. The immunogenicity was evaluated by testing for anti-HBs and anti-HAV antibodies. Seroconversion rates and geometric mean titres (GMTs) were compared. At month 7, the anti-HAV GMTs were higher in the high-dose group than in the Twinrix group and, inversely, the anti-HBs GMTs were slightly higher in the Twinrix group than in the high-dose group. At month 7, all subjects in both groups were positive for anti-HAV. All subjects in the high-dose group and 97.6% subjects in the Twinrix group had seroconverted for anti-HBs. Therefore, it can be concluded that with two injections of the high-dose hepatitis A and B vaccine, 6 months apart, a similar immune response can be obtained as induced with three doses of Twinrix at months 0, 1 and 6.

The first combined vaccine against hepatitis A and B: an overview.

Hepatitis A and B infections are prevalent world-wide and are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. A vaccine providing dual protection against hepatitis A and B is now available (Twinrix, SmithKline Beecham Biologicals). Six pivotal vaccine trials, involving 843 healthy adults, aged between 17 and 60 years and vaccinated following a 0, 1, 6 month schedule are discussed. At month 2 more than 99% of the vaccinees were seropositive for anti-HAV and 84% were protected against hepatitis B. The third dose induced a 12-fold increase in geometric mean titres (GMTs) to 5404 mIU/ml. One month after completion of the vaccination course nearly all vaccinees had protective titres against hepatitis B with a GMT of 4818 mIU/ml. Long term follow-up data until month 48 is available for two studies. At month 48 all 129 vaccinees sampled were still positive for anti-HAV antibodies and > 95% were still protected against hepatitis B. The combined hepatitis A and B vaccine Twinrix proves to be consistently safe, well tolerated and highly immunogenic and compares well with serological responses reached with monovalent vaccines. This combined hepatitis A and B vaccine offers more convenience, potentially better compliance and lower administration costs.

Two-dose combined vaccination against hepatitis A and B in healthy subjects aged 11-18 years.

BACKGROUND: In this open, randomized trial the safety, reactogenicity, and immunogenicity profile of a high-dose combined hepatitis A and B candidate vaccine was compared with that of Twinrix Paediatric in healthy volunteers aged 11-18 years. METHODS: One hundred subjects were randomly allocated to either of two groups. One group received the high-dose vaccine (720 E1.U HAV antigen; 20 microg hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) at months 0 and 6; the second group received Twinrix Paediatric (360 E1.U HAV antigen; 10 microg HBsAg), following a 0-1-6-month schedule. RESULTS: Injection site soreness and fatigue were the most frequently reported solicited symptoms. For hepatitis A all subjects had seroconverted at month 7, and geometric mean titres (GMT) were 8,151 mIU/ml in the high-dose group and 6,394 mIU/ml in the Twinrix Paediatric group. For hepatitis B the GMT for the Twinrix Paediatric group was significantly higher at month 2 and month 6. However, no difference in GMT between groups could be established at month 7. The seroprotection rate attained 100% in both groups, and GMT were 4,212 mIU/ml (high-dose group) and 6,330 mIU/ml (Twinrix Paediatric). CONCLUSIONS: The two vaccines showed similar safety and reactogenicity profiles. After completion of the vaccination schedule, no difference in immunogenicity was shown. This high-dose vaccine, administered following a two-dose schedule, can be considered an alternative regimen for the immunization of healthy adolescents against hepatitis A and hepatitis B infections, in a setting where vaccinees are not immediately at risk of exposure to hepatitis B.

A dose response study of hepatitis A vaccine in healthy adults who are > or = 30 years old and weigh > or = 77 kg.

The dose response relationship of 25-, 50-, and 100-U doses of an inactivated hepatitis A vaccine was examined in 358-seronegative volunteers in a 2-dose schedule. The 50-U and 100-U groups had statistically significantly higher seroconversion rates than the 25-U group at weeks 2, 4, 8, and 24. Seroconversion was statistically significantly greater for the 100-U compared with the 25- and 50-U doses 2 weeks after the first injection but was not significantly different by 4 weeks after the first injection in the 50- and 100-U dose groups. After 2 injections, all subjects in all groups seroconverted. The vaccine was well tolerated at all dosage levels.

Long-term persistence of anti-HBs after vaccination with a recombinant DNA yeast-derived hepatitis B vaccine: 8-year results.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the persistence of antibodies 7 years after hepatitis B booster administration in healthy adult volunteers who were vaccinated in 1986. In October 1986, 188 seronegative, healthy adult volunteers (117 men and 71 women) were vaccinated with a 20 micrograms dose recombinant DNA yeast-derived hepatitis B vaccine. Mean age of the study group was 23.3 years (+/- 0.28). Immunisation was carried out according to a 0-1-2 month vaccination schedule, with a booster dose at 12 months. Of the 159 subjects who received the full vaccination course, 63 (40%) had a blood sample taken 8 years after the first vaccination. Of these 63 subjects, five were excluded from the analysis due to an irregular vaccination schedule and four subjects did not complete the accompanying questionnaire on possible booster administration. So, 54 subjects remained available for further analysis. Fourteen individuals had received an additional booster of hepatitis B vaccine sometime between 1989 and 1994. The geometric mean titre (GMT) at month 13 for these 14 individuals was 1494 mIU ml-1, compared with 3103 mIU ml-1 for those who did not receive an interim booster. Forty subjects, who received no additional booster dose besides that of month 12, met the inclusion criteria of the follow-up study. Of these, all subjects except one were seropositive for anti-HBs at month 96 (GMT: 215.9 mIU ml-1). All subjects were still anti-HBc negative at that time. Distribution of individual antibody titres revealed that overall 92.5% of subjects retained protective antibody levels (> or = 10 mIU ml-1); 72.5% of vaccinees retained high levels of anti-HBs (> or = 100 mIU ml-1) as compared to 99.2 and 97.0% at month 13, respectively. A positive correlation was found between the subjects' titres at month 13 and month 96. A 0-1-2 dose vaccination course with a booster dose administered at month 12, induces a protective immune response which lasts at least until 7 years after the full vaccination course of the subjects. A positive correlation was found between the anti-HBs antibody titres at month 13 and month 96.

Safety and immunogenicity of a hepatitis B vaccine formulated with a novel adjuvant system.

A formulation of recombinant hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) combined with a novel adjuvant system, SBAS4--a combination of aluminium salt and monophosphoryl lipid A (MPL), was assessed in 27 healthy adult volunteers with a commercial vaccine (Engerix-B) as control. After three doses (0, 1, 6 months schedule), reactogenicity profiles were similar. Local reactions were essentially mild, the most frequent being soreness at the injection site. Seroprotection was achieved after two doses in all subjects given the candidate vaccine, all Engerix-B vaccines being seroprotected after the third dose. After the second and third doses, higher anti-HBs Geometric Mean Titres (GMTs) were observed in the group which received the formulation with the novel adjuvant system, and cellular immunity, measured as HBsAg-specific lymphoproliferation was stronger than with Engerix-B. These results indicate that the new formulation is safe, well-tolerated and immunogenic and may promote more rapid protection against hepatitis B infection.

Safety and Immunogenicity of a High-Potency Inactivated Hepatitis A Vaccine.

Background: In recent years, several hepatitis A vaccines have been developed. We wished to evaluate the safety, reactogenicity, and immunogenicity of an inactivated hepatitis A vaccine, containing 1440 EI.U., and to monitor the kinetics of the antibodies monthly for the first year after administration of a single dose of vaccine. Methods: We conducted an open clinical trial, started in March 1992 and completed in July 1993, at two general hospitals and one pediatric hospital in Antwerp, Belgium, with 194 healthy adult healthcare volunteers. Each volunteer received a single dose hepatitis A vaccine, given intramuscularly at month 0 and a booster at month 12. We undertook serologic follow-up of antihepatitis A virus (antiHAV) antibodies and liver enzymes at day 15 and at months 1, 6, 9, 12, and 13. For a random subgroup of participants, blood samples were taken monthly. In addition, all participants noted local and general symptoms following administration of the vaccine. Results: This single dose vaccine was well-tolerated; 2 weeks after the vaccination, 80% of the participants had seroconverted (antiHAV antibodies >=20 mIU/mL); after 1 month, seroconversion reached 99% (geometric mean titer (GMT): 383 mIU/mL). One year after the single dose of vaccine, 94% still had antiHAV antibodies above 20 mIU/mL (GMT: 176 mIU/mL). One month after the booster dose, seroconversion was 100%, and GMT increased from 176 mIU/mL at month 12 to 4775 mIU/mL at month 13. Conclusions: The single dose hepatitis A vaccine is safe and highly immunogenic; it gives a rapid antibody production and a rapid increase of GMT. The persistence of protective antibodies until month 12 allows a booster at month 12. This schedule will easily fit into existing travel or occupational health vaccination schedules and will improve vaccination compliance.

Single dose inactivated hepatitis A vaccine: rationale and clinical assessment of the safety and immunogenicity.

In comparison with the classical immunisation schedules (0-1-6 or 0-1-12 months) for hepatitis A, a 0- and 12- or a 0- and 6-month schedule would have important advantages by reducing the number of injections and discomfort and increasing scheduling convenience and patient compliance. It would be convenient if a single dose with enough antigen could protect both rapidly and for at least 12 months, when the booster dose would be given. Several clinical trials have been carried out with an inactivated hepatitis A vaccine containing 1,440 EL.U. (1 ml), according to a 0-12 and a 0-6 vaccination schedule. This hepatitis A vaccine is safe and well tolerated. It offers a rapid seroresponse: 14 days after a single dose the seroconversion is 88% (95% C.I.: 84.6-90.9). The 0-12 schedule study showed good persistence of hepatitis A virus (HAV) antibodies with a seroconversion rate of almost 95% at month 12. Booster doses given at 6 or 12 months result in a substantial rise in antibody levels; according to these antibody titres, the 1,440 EL.U. vaccine can be expected to confer comparable duration of protection as the 720 EL.U. vaccine, i.e., 10-20 years. Preliminary data show that timing of the booster may not be critical for the antibody response. In conclusion, the 1,440 EL.U. hepatitis A vaccine is safe, offers rapid seroconversion, and is highly immunogenic. The persistence of HAV antibodies until month 12 allows a certain flexibility in the administration of the booster: month 6 or 12, and a 0-12 or 0-6 schedule can increase the vaccination compliance.

Inactivated hepatitis A vaccine: reactogenicity, immunogenicity, and long-term antibody persistence.

This trial evaluated the reactogenicity, kinetics of antibody induction, and long-term immunogenicity of a 720 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay units (EL.U.) antigen dose of an inactivated hepatitis A vaccine (Havrix, SmithKline Beecham Biologicals, Rixensart, Belgium). One hundred six healthy adult volunteers were enrolled to receive vaccine intramuscularly according to a 0, 1, and 6-month schedule. The vaccine was well tolerated. The most frequently reported local symptom was soreness, observed following 37.1% of all doses. Headache was the most frequently reported general symptom observed following 12.9% of documented vaccine doses. The administration of one vaccine dose induced seropositivity (anti-hepatitis A virus [HAV] > or = 20 mIU/ml) in 91% of all vaccinees 1 month later. The second vaccine dose resulted in seropositivity of the remaining vaccinees at month 2. All subjects remained seropositive for HAV antibodies at month 6, at which time the booster vaccine dose was given. At month 7, all vaccinees had anti-HAV titres > 200 mIU/ml. Serological results obtained at months 12, 18, 24, and 36 showed that antibodies against HAV induced by the vaccine booster dose persist for at least 30 months following its administration. All 49 subjects followed up until month 36 had antibody titres > or = 20 mIU/ml. The geometric mean titre (GMT) decreased by 60% from month 7 to month 12; between month 12 and 36, the GMT decreased by approximately 14% per period of 12 months. According to the vaccine-induced antibody kinetics and the magnitude of antibody level decrease over time, the predicted duration of antibody persistence is estimated to be at least 20 years.