Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am J Emerg Med ; 34(3): 486-92, 2016 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26782795

RESUMO

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Ascending aortic dissection (AAD) is an uncommon, time-sensitive, and deadly diagnosis with a nonspecific presentation. Ascending aortic dissection is associated with aortic dilation, which can be determined by emergency physician focused cardiac ultrasound (EP FOCUS). We seek to determine if patients who receive EP FOCUS have reduced time to diagnosis for AAD. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of patients treated at 1 of 3 affiliated emergency departments, March 1, 2013, to May 1, 2015, diagnosed as having AAD. All autopsies were reviewed for missed cases. Primary outcome measure was time to diagnosis. Secondary outcomes were time to disposition, misdiagnosis rate, and mortality. RESULTS: Of 386547 ED visits, targeted review of 123 medical records and 194 autopsy reports identified 32 patients for inclusion. Sixteen patients received EP FOCUS and 16 did not. Median time to diagnosis in the EP FOCUS group was 80 (interquartile range [IQR], 46-157) minutes vs 226 (IQR, 109-1449) minutes in the non-EP FOCUS group (P = .023). Misdiagnosis was 0% (0/16) in the EP FOCUS group vs 43.8% (7/16) in the non-EP FOCUS group (P = .028). Mortality, adjusted for do-not-resuscitate status, for EP FOCUS vs non-EP FOCUS was 15.4% vs 37.5% (P = .24). Median rooming time to disposition was 134 (IQR, 101-195) minutes for EP FOCUS vs 205 (IQR, 114-342) minutes for non-EP FOCUS (P = .27). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who receive EP FOCUS are diagnosed faster and misdiagnosed less compared with patients who do not receive EP FOCUS. We recommend assessment of the thoracic aorta be performed routinely during cardiac ultrasound in the emergency department.


Assuntos
Aneurisma da Aorta Torácica/diagnóstico , Dissecção Aórtica/diagnóstico , Erros de Diagnóstico/estatística & dados numéricos , Ecocardiografia Transesofagiana/métodos , Medicina de Emergência/métodos , Dissecção Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagem , Dissecção Aórtica/mortalidade , Aneurisma da Aorta Torácica/diagnóstico por imagem , Aneurisma da Aorta Torácica/mortalidade , Autopsia/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviços Médicos de Emergência/métodos , Serviços Médicos de Emergência/normas , Serviços Médicos de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicina de Emergência/normas , Medicina de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Prontuários Médicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Sistemas Multi-Institucionais/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Multicêntricos como Assunto , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Tempo , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X
2.
Acad Emerg Med ; 22(5): 583-93, 2015 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25903585

RESUMO

Emergency physician (EP)-performed focused cardiac ultrasound (EP FOCUS) has been increasingly recognized as a crucial tool to help clinicians diagnose and treat potentially life-threatening conditions. The existing literature demonstrates a variety of EP FOCUS applications and protocols; however, EP FOCUS is not taught, practiced, or interpreted consistently between institutions. Drawing on over 12 years of experience in a large-volume, high-acuity academic emergency department, we have developed a protocol for teaching and performing EP FOCUS known as "The 5Es," where each E represents a specific assessment for immediately relevant clinical information. These include pericardial effusion, qualitative left ventricular ejection, ventricular equality, exit (aortic root diameter), and entrance (inferior vena cava diameter and respirophasic variation). Each of these assessments has been well described in the emergency medicine literature and is within the scope of EP-performed echocardiography. This approach provides a reliable and easily recalled framework for assessing, teaching, and communicating EP FOCUS findings that are essential in caring for the patient in the emergency setting.


Assuntos
Competência Clínica/normas , Ecocardiografia/normas , Serviços Médicos de Emergência/normas , Sistemas Automatizados de Assistência Junto ao Leito/normas , Ecocardiografia/métodos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/normas , Ventrículos do Coração/diagnóstico por imagem , Humanos , Derrame Pericárdico/diagnóstico por imagem , Estados Unidos , Veia Cava Inferior/diagnóstico por imagem
4.
Curr Microbiol ; 48(3): 219-23, 2004 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15057469

RESUMO

The ruminal, cellulolytic bacterium, Fibrobacter succinogenes A3C, grew rapidly on cellulose, cellobiose, or glucose, but it could not withstand long periods of energy source starvation. If ammonia was limiting and either cellobiose or glucose was in excess, the viability declined even faster. The carbohydrate-excess, ammonia-limited cultures did not spill energy, but they accumulated large amounts of cellular polysaccharide. Cultures that were carbohydrate-limited had approximately 4 nmol ATP mg cell protein(-1), but ATP could not be detected in cultures that had an excess of soluble carbohydrates. However, if F. succinogenes A3C was provided with excess cellulose and ammonia was limiting, ATP did not decline, and the cultures digested the cellulose soon after additional nitrogen sources were added. From these results, it appears that excess soluble carbohydrates can promote the death of F. succinogenes, but cellulose does not.


Assuntos
Celobiose/metabolismo , Celulose/metabolismo , Fibrobacter/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Fibrobacter/metabolismo , Glucose/metabolismo , Compostos de Amônio Quaternário/metabolismo , Ácidos/análise , Trifosfato de Adenosina/metabolismo , Amônia/análise , Proteínas de Bactérias/análise , Biomassa , Meios de Cultura/química , Fermentação
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...