RESUMO
Objectives: Vietnam was the first country from the WHO Western Pacific Region to adopt a national action plan (NAP) on antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in 2013. The multilayered nature of AMR requires coordination across 'One Health' sectors, dedicated financing, multistakeholder involvement, and widespread community engagement to implement the action plans. This study explores the perceived impact of NAP implementation at the community level. Methods: Key informant interviews (KIIs) were used for data collection during 2021. An interview tool was used for the KIIs and purposive sampling was used to identify study participants from Vietnam. The study participants were those engaged with a substantial scale of antimicrobial usage, diagnosis of infections or concerned with antimicrobial content in effluents in their professional life. Twelve KIIs were conducted with participants from human health, animal health and the environmental sector. The data were entered into Microsoft Excel, and manifest and latent content analysis was done. Results: The analysis highlighted themes such as limited public awareness of AMR, ongoing capacity building and quality assurance initiatives, implementation of guidelines and regulations for AMR containment, sustained investment in improving infrastructure, and challenges relating to accountability whilst prescribing and selling antibiotics. Conclusions: There were many positive critical developments during the NAP implementation period in Vietnam towards AMR mitigation. For better impact, there is a need to revitalize the implementation machinery of NAPs by improving the enforcement capacity of regulations, cross-sectoral collaboration and promoting community ownership.
RESUMO
Antibiotic resistance (ABR) is increasing the mortality and morbidity associated with infectious diseases, besides increasing the cost of healthcare, saturating health system capacity, and adversely affecting food security. Framing an appropriate narrative and engaging local communities through the 'One Health' approach is essential to complement top-down measures. However, the absence of objective criteria to measure the performance of ABR interventions in community settings makes it difficult to mobilize interest and investment for such interventions. An exercise was therefore carried out to develop an indicator framework for this purpose. A comprehensive list of indicators was developed from experiences gathered through community engagement work in a local panchayat (small administrative area) in Kerala, India and a consultative process with health, veterinary, environment, and development experts. A prioritization exercise was carried out by global experts on ABR, looking at appropriateness, feasibility, and validity. A 15-point indicator framework was designed based on the prioritization process. The final set of indicators covers human health, animal health, environment management, and Water Sanitation and Hygiene (WASH) domains. The indicator framework was piloted in the panchayat (located in Kerala), which attained a score of 34 (maximum 45). The score increased when interventions were implemented to mitigate the ABR drives, indicating that the framework is sensitive to change. The indicator framework was tested in four sites from three other Indian states with different socioeconomic and health profiles, yielding different scores. Those collecting the field data were able to use the framework with minimal training. It is hoped that, this indicator framework can help policymakers broadly understand the factors contributing to ABR and measure the performance of interventions they choose to implement in the community as part of National Action Plan on AMR.
RESUMO
Purpose: Over-the-counter (OTC) sale of antibiotics have contributed to the growing threat of antibiotic resistance. The Government of India has instituted regulatory measures, such as Schedule H1 and public campaigns such as Red Line Campaign, to limit such sales. This study was conducted to assess the perceptions of stakeholders regarding their effectiveness. Methods: To assess Schedule H1, pharmacists who own retail pharmacies in the state of Kerala, India, were interviewed using a pre-prepared question guide. In the next phase, healthcare professionals and patients in a hospital were shown the Red Line on an antibiotic blister pack and asked about its significance. Finally, 100 patients were shown a blister pack of Amoxicillin, and asked to identify the medicine or its use. Results: It was observed that there is poor awareness about antibiotic regulations and a perception of laxity in enforcement. Regarding the Red Line, only 7% of healthcare professionals could describe its significance and none among patients. Among the 100 patients who were shown Amoxicillin, only 42 could identify it as an antibiotic or describe its use. Conclusions: There is a general perception that regulations are poorly enforced and all are not aware of the Red Line campaign including healthcare professionals. Greater awareness at all levels about appropriate antibiotic use through prescriptions followed by greater efforts towards regulatory implementation and compliance should form parts of a multi-modal strategy to contain OTC sales of antibiotics. This will greatly help to aid physicians in improving overall healthcare through safe and effective prescribing.
