Does Capsular Laxity Lead to Microinstability of the Native Hip?

BACKGROUND: Hip "microinstability" is commonly cited as the cause of symptoms that occur in the presence of translation of the femoral head away from conformity with the acetabular fossa. However, there is still no consistent objective criteria defining its presence and biomechanical basis. One hypothesis is that abnormal motion of the articular surfaces occurs because of capsular laxity, ultimately leading to clinical symptoms. PURPOSE: To determine the relationship between capsular laxity and abnormal rotation and translation of the hip. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Eight cadaveric hips were dissected down to the capsule and mounted in a customized multiaxial hip activity simulator. Each specimen was loaded with 5 N·m of internal and external rotational torque in full extension and 0°, 30°, 60°, and 90° of flexion. During testing, the relative position and rotation of the femur and the pelvis were monitored in real time with a 6-camera motion analysis system. The testing was repeated after capsular laxity was generated by placing a regular array of incisions ("pie crusting") in the iliofemoral, pubofemoral, and ischiofemoral ligaments. Joint rotation and femoral head translation were calculated with specimen-specific models. A hip microinstability index was defined as the ratio between the length of the locus of the femoral head center and the radius of the femoral head during rotation from extension to 90° of flexion. RESULTS: In intact hips, the components of femoral head translation were within 0.5 mm in positions close to neutral (<30° of flexion). Capsular modification led to significant increases in internal and external rotation ( P < .01) and in the translation of the femoral head center at different positions ( P < .05). Compared with intact hips, the femoral head was inferiorly displaced during external rotation and anteroinferiorly during internal rotation. The length of the locus of the femoral head center increased from 3.61 ± 1.30 mm to 5.35 ± 1.83 mm for external rotation ( P < .05) and from 6.24 ± 1.48 mm to 8.21 ± 1.42 mm for internal rotation ( P < .01). The correlations between rotational laxity and the total translation of the femoral head were not significant, with coefficients of 0.093 and 0.006 in external and internal rotation, respectively. In addition, the hip microinstability index increased from 0.40 ± 0.08 for intact hips to 0.55 ± 0.09 for modified hips ( P < .01). CONCLUSION: The native hip approximates a concentric ball-and-socket joint within 30° of flexion; however, beyond 30° of flexion, the femoral head translation reached as high as 4 mm. Capsular laxity leads to microinstability of the hip, as indicated by significantly increased joint rotations and femoral head translations and an abnormal movement path of the femoral head center. However, there was no correlation between rotational laxity and the increase in femoral head translation. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Capsular laxity alters normal kinematics (joint rotation and femoral head translation) of the hip, potentially leading to abnormal femoral-acetabular contact and joint degeneration.

Hypothermia in Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Wake-Up Call.

BACKGROUND: Total joint patients are particularly vulnerable to perioperative hypothermia (PH) (combined effects of anesthesia, radiation, and convective heat loss from exposed skin surfaces and cool temperatures in the operating room). There are limited studies on PH in these patients. METHODS: In a retrospective review of 204 patients undergoing primary hip and 179 undergoing primary knee replacement surgeries, time and temperature parameters were collected from the electronic health records from preoperative and postoperative recovery room nursing assessments, intraoperative anesthesia records, and floor nursing notes. Basic patient demographic data was recorded. Chi-squared and paired t-tests were used to compare between hypothermic and normothermic groups. RESULTS: At the time of incision, 60 of 179 (34%) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients and 80 of 204 (39%) total hip arthroplasty (THA) patients were hypothermic. In THA patients, 65% remained hypothermic for the duration of anesthesia compared to 33% of TKA patients. The largest drop in core body temperature in both THA and TKA patients occurred between preoperative holding and induction of anesthesia. In THA patients, spinal anesthesia had a significantly higher occurrence of PH. No significant patient factor was found to increase risk. CONCLUSION: Emphasis on preoperative holding protocols, decreasing time from operating room entry to incision, and increasing ambient room temperature could reduce risk of hypothermia in total joint replacement patients.