Penetrating colon injuries requiring resection: diversion or primary anastomosis? An AAST prospective multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: The management of colon injuries that require resection is an unresolved issue because the existing practices are derived mainly from class III evidence. Because of the inability of any single trauma center to accumulate enough cases for meaningful statistical analysis, a multicenter prospective study was performed to compare primary anastomosis with diversion and identify the risk factors for colon-related abdominal complications. METHODS: This was a prospective study from 19 trauma centers and included patients with colon resection because of penetrating trauma, who survived at least 72 hours. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to compare outcomes in patients with primary anastomosis or diversion and identify independent risk factors for the development of abdominal complications. RESULTS: Two hundred ninety-seven patients fulfilled the criteria for inclusion and analysis. Overall, 197 patients (66.3%) were managed by primary anastomosis and 100 (33.7%) by diversion. The overall colon-related mortality was 1.3% (four deaths in the diversion group, no deaths in the primary anastomosis group, p = 0.012). Colon-related abdominal complications occurred in 24% of all patients (primary repair, 22%; diversion, 27%; p = 0.373). Multivariate analysis including all potential risk factors with p values < 0.2 identified three independent risk factors for abdominal complications: severe fecal contamination, transfusion of > or = 4 units of blood within the first 24 hours, and single-agent antibiotic prophylaxis. The type of colon management was not found to be a risk factor. Comparison of primary anastomosis with diversion using multivariate analysis adjusting for the above three identified risk factors or the risk factors previously described in the literature (shock at admission, delay > 6 hours to operating room, penetrating abdominal trauma index > 25, severe fecal contamination, and transfusion of > 6 units blood) showed no statistically significant difference in outcome. Similarly, multivariate analysis and comparison of the two methods of colon management in high-risk patients showed no difference in outcome. CONCLUSION: The surgical method of colon management after resection for penetrating trauma does not affect the incidence of abdominal complications, irrespective of associated risk factors. Severe fecal contamination, transfusion of > or = 4 units of blood within the first 24 hours, and single-agent antibiotic prophylaxis are independent risk factors for abdominal complications. In view of these findings, the reduced quality of life, and the need for a subsequent operation in colostomy patients, primary anastomosis should be considered in all such patients.

Laparoscopic repair of a ruptured diaphragm secondary to blunt trauma.

The diagnosis of acute diaphragmatic rupture can be a challenge for even the most experienced clinician. The treatment of the rupture and its concomitant injuries, particularly in the elderly, can be associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The advent of laparoscopy for both the diagnosis and repair of this condition has allowed a more minimally invasive approach. We present the case of a 70-year-old woman who was hurt in a motor vehicle crash. On admission, her physical exam showed left upper quadrant tenderness and bruising. The chest radiograph was suggestive of a ruptured diaphragm. She was taken to the operating room and explored laparoscopically. After a thorough exploration of all the abdominal contents, a tear in the diaphragmatic hiatus to the right of the esophagus was noted. The stomach and small intestine were returned to the abdomen, and the diaphragmatic rupture was repaired. We conclude that laparoscopic exploration and repair of a ruptured diaphragm in a bluntly injured patient is a safe and effective option in selected cases.

Pancreatic injuries resulting from penetrating trauma: a multi-institution review.

Pancreatic injury from penetrating trauma continues to be a source of significant morbidity and mortality, with questions remaining regarding optimal treatment of injuries. Our goal was to evaluate current trends in the operative management of these injuries. Our patient population comprised all patients admitted to one of three Level I trauma centers over an 8-year period that had sustained penetrating pancreatic trauma. The study was a retrospective chart review. Sixty-two patients were identified. All had associated abdominal injuries, with the liver and stomach being the most commonly injured organs. There were 14 deaths (mortality 22.6%), 10 within the first 48 hours due to associated vascular injury. In the 52 patients surviving beyond 48 hours, there were 19 patients with injuries to the main pancreatic duct and 33 with parenchymal injuries only. Pancreatic resection was carried out for all patients with ductal injury except for one, who later required distal pancreatectomy for pseudocyst and pancreatic fistula. Significant pancreatic fistulae developed in five patients, three in patients treated by drainage and two in patients treated by resection. The incidence of fistula formation was significantly higher for drainage versus resection in the patients with ductal injuries. The incidences of other complications were not affected by type of pancreatic injury, associated injuries, or method of management. We conclude that the majority of deaths in patients with penetrating pancreatic trauma are due to associated organ or vascular injuries. Appropriate management of the pancreatic injury can reduce the long-term complications. These results support treating patients with suspected ductal injuries by appropriate resection. Drainage should probably be sufficient for most nonductal pancreatic injuries.

Effectiveness of cholecystokinin-stimulated cholescintigraphy in the diagnosis and treatment of acalculous gallbladder disease.

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 107 patients in two community hospitals who had undergone cholecystokinin-stimulated cholescintigraphy with ejection fraction to determine whether this test is reliable in identifying patients whose symptoms will improve following cholecystectomy. Patients with cholelithiasis or incomplete medical records and patients who could not be interviewed were excluded from the study. Forty-two of 58 study patients (72%) had an abnormal ejection fraction (defined as 35% or less); 27 of 42 patients (64%) underwent cholecystectomy. Twenty-six of 27 (96%) reported lessening of or resolution of symptoms following cholecystectomy. Sixty-seven per cent of the surgical specimens from the 27 patients demonstrated chronic cholecystitis. Fifteen of 42 patients (36%) with abnormal ejection fractions did not undergo cholecystectomy; 12 of 15 (80%) also reported lessening or resolution of symptoms. Of the 16 of 58 patients with a normal ejection fraction, 2 underwent cholecystectomy and reported resolution of symptoms. Five of 14 (36%) with normal ejection fractions who did not undergo cholecystectomy reported improvement. In this series, most patients with an abnormal ejection fraction had lessening of symptoms regardless of whether they underwent cholecystectomy.

Management outcomes in splenic injury: a statewide trauma center review.

OBJECTIVE: Clinical pathways now highlight both observation and operation as acceptable initial therapeutic options for the management of patients with splenic injury. The purpose of this study was to evaluate treatment trends for splenic injury in all North Carolina trauma centers over a 6-year period. METHODS: Splenic injuries in adults over a 6-year period (January 1988-December 1993) were identified in the North Carolina Trauma Registry using ICD-9-CM codes. Patients were divided into four groups by method of management: 1) no spleen operation, 2) splenectomy, 3) definitive splenorrhaphy, and 4) splenorrhaphy failure followed by splenectomy. The authors examined age, mechanism of injury, admitting blood pressure, and severity of injury by trauma score and injury severity score. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Comparisons were made between adult (17-64 years of age) and geriatric (older than 65 years of age) patients and between patients with blunt and penetrating injury. Resource utilization (length of stay, hospital charges) and outcome (mortality) were compared. RESULTS: One thousand two hundred fifty-five patients were identified with splenic injury. Rate of splenic preservation increased over time and was achieved in more than 50% of patients through nonoperative management (40%) and splenorrhaphy (12%). Splenorrhaphy was not used commonly in either blunt or penetrating injury. Overall mortality was 13%. Geriatric patients had a higher mortality and resource utilization regardless of their mechanism of injury or method of management. CONCLUSIONS: Nonoperative management represents the prevailing method of splenic preservation in both the adult and geriatric population in North Carolina trauma center hospitals. Satisfactory outcomes and economic advantages accompany nonoperative management in this adult population.

Nosocomial pneumonia in ventilated trauma patients during stress ulcer prophylaxis with sucralfate, antacid, and ranitidine.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the incidence of nosocomial pneumonia in critically injured patients randomized to one of three stress ulcer prophylaxis regimens. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized clinical trial. METHODS: Mechanically ventilated patients admitted to the trauma intensive care unit of a Level I trauma center received sucralfate, antacid, or ranitidine. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Two hundred forty-two patients were randomized: sucralfate, n = 80; antacid, n = 82; and ranitidine, n = 80. There was no statistically significant difference in pneumonia rates among the treatment groups (p = 0.875). Pneumonia occurred more frequently in patients with gram-negative retrograde colonization from stomach to trachea (p = 0.02), but this accounted for only 13% of all pneumonias in the study population. The death rate in patients with pneumonia was not statistically different among the three groups. Although 20% developed overt gastrointestinal bleeding, no episode was clinically significant. Mean gastric pH was > 4 in 95% of the study population, including 88% of patients receiving sucralfate. The death rate in the antacid group was significantly higher (p = 0.046) but not because of increased gastrointestinal bleeding or pneumonia. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show no difference in the incidence of nosocomial pneumonia in mechanically ventilated trauma patients during the first 4 days of stress ulcer prophylaxis with sucralfate, antacid, or ranitidine. There is a trend toward decreased pneumonia in the sucralfate group after study day 4. Even after controlling for injury severity, the mortality rate in the antacid group was significantly higher; the reasons for this are unknown.

Thoracic aorta injuries: management and outcome of 144 patients.

Rupture of the thoracic aorta from blunt injury is often lethal. Methods of operative repair vary, based on the surgeon's preference and circumstances. The primary hypothesis of this study was that operative management choices would correlate with outcome. Data on demographics, injury mechanism, initial evaluation, diagnostic procedures, operative treatment, and outcome were obtained from chart review at the state's eight trauma centers. Rates of paraplegia and survival were compared for different methods of operative repair. Of 63,507 hospitalized trauma patients, 144 patients sustained thoracic aortic injury (incidence = 0.23%). Sixty-four died (44.1%), most of whom died in the emergency department (26) or the operating room (12). Eighty-six patients had complete operative data for analysis, including cross-clamp time and methods of repair. No patient in the group with a cross-clamp time of less than 35 minutes developed paraplegia (p = 0.02). For the patients with longer cross-clamp times, 6 of 14 patients (42.9%) undergoing clamp and sew repair developed paraplegia, as compared to 2 of 37 patients (5.4%) repaired on bypass (p = 0.005). This study suggests that the rate of paraplegia after repair of thoracic aortic injury can be minimized with short cross-clamp times or the use of bypass when long cross-clamp times can be anticipated.

Enforcement of drunken driving laws in cases involving injured intoxicated drivers.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine the frequency of driving while impaired (DWI) charges among alcohol-intoxicated drivers injured in motor vehicle crashes (MVCs) and any differences in the group of those charged compared with those not charged. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of linked data from medical and judicial sources. Our setting was an urban emergency department of a trauma center serving a population of 1 million. We studied consecutive drivers injured in MVCs over a period of 15 months who had measured serum ethanol (BAC) levels of 100 mg/dL or higher. BAC, Trauma Score (TS), demographics, and crash data were linked to court records of charges, outcome, and prior convictions. The group of individuals who were charged with DWI were compared with those who were not charged. RESULTS: One hundred eighty-seven patients were studied; 53 (28%) were charged with DWI, and 32 (17% of total) were convicted. Two (7%) of 29 patients with severe injuries, 9 (28%) of 32 with moderate injuries, and 42 (33%) of 126 with nonsevere injuries were charged (P = .004). Eighteen (16%) of 112 patients with no prior convictions were charged; 20 (56%) of 36 patients with one, 11 (52%) of 21 with two, 3 (25%) of 12 with three, and 0 of 5 with four or more prior DWI convictions were charged (P < .001). There were no significant differences in BAC, demographics, or other measures between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Alcohol-impaired drivers who require ED treatment for injuries sustained in an MVC are infrequently charged with DWI. The likelihood of a DWI charge diminishes with increasing severity of injury. Repeat offenders are charged more often, but the frequency of charges does not increase with increasing number of prior DWI convictions.

Ectopic pregnancy in a blunt trauma patient.

Trauma during pregnancy is a frequent occurrence, and early pregnancies are likely to be unrecognized in the routine evaluation of female trauma patients. We present the case of a 16-year-old woman injured in a motor vehicle crash who sustained a closed head injury and was found to have a right ectopic tubal pregnancy. Since several physiologic responses and pathologic conditions occur during pregnancy, which complicate the diagnosis and treatment of a pregnant patient, it is important to detect pregnancy early in the patient's evaluation. This case report demonstrates an unusual presentation of ectopic pregnancy and illustrates the merits of routine pregnancy testing of female trauma patients.

Injury surveillance: a method for recording E codes for injured emergency department patients.

STUDY PURPOSE: Little information exists on the cause of injury for patients who are treated and discharged from emergency departments; these patients comprise approximately 90% of all injured patients requiring medical care. A method is described to assign external cause of injury codes (E codes) prospectively to all injured patients seen in a large-volume ED. METHODS: E code assignment was performed by the ED triage nurses on entrance to the ED. A checklist was used that contained frequently occurring codes as identified in a pilot study. E codes were entered into the patients' records on the hospital mainframe computer by a medical records technician. These were acquired for a nine-month period to determine feasibility, accuracy, and ease of use. Accuracy was verified retrospectively. RESULTS: During the nine-month period, 67,495 patients were treated. Acute injury accounted for 16,186 of the visits, and 2,085 were return visits for a previously treated injury. The majority of patients with any injury type were treated and discharged and would not have been included in traditional data sets of injured patients. Overall admission rate for injury was 13%. Accuracy of prospectively assigned E codes was 98%, and this method of assigning E codes resulted in no additional effort by the triage nurse. CONCLUSION: E coding is a valuable method for injury surveillance, easily performed in EDs with high volume. Its value is essential for injury prevention research on injuries from any cause.

Alcohol and vehicular injuries in adolescents.

Although there is a disproportionately high accident rate among adolescent drivers due to inexperience, alcohol appears to play a significant role in this number one killer for the age group. To assess this, the level of blood alcohol was measured in adolescents admitted to a trauma center following vehicular injuries.

Pseudoobstruction of the colon.

A previously unreported complication of extraperitoneal node dissection, pseudoobstruction of the colon, is described as a case report, and its etiology and treatment are discussed.