The effects of safety checklists in medicine: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Safety checklists have become an established safety tool in medicine. Despite studies showing decreased mortality and complications, the effects and feasibility of checklists have been questioned. This systematic review summarises the medical literature aiming to show the effects of safety checklists with a number of outcomes. METHODS: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement was used. All studies in which safety checklists were used as an additional tool designed to assure that an operation or task was performed as planned were included. RESULTS: The initial search extracted 7408 hits. Twenty-nine articles met the inclusion criteria. Five additional studies were identified by a cross-referencing search. Four groups were made according to outcome measures. One group (n = 7) had 'hard' outcome measures, such as mortality and morbidity. The remaining studies, reporting 'softer' process-related measures, were divided into three categories: adherence to guidelines (n = 6), human factors (n = 16), and reduction of adverse events (n = 5). The main findings were improved communication, reduced adverse events, better adherence to standard operating procedures, and reduced morbidity and mortality. None of the included studies reported decreased patient safety or quality after introducing safety checklists. CONCLUSION: Safety checklists appear to be effective tools for improving patient safety in various clinical settings by strengthening compliance with guidelines, improving human factors, reducing the incidence of adverse events, and decreasing mortality and morbidity. None of the included studies reported negative effects on safety.

The effect of a simple checklist on frequent pre-induction deficiencies.

BACKGROUND: A substantial proportion of anaesthesia-related adverse events are preventable by identification and correction of errors in planning, communication, fatigue, stress, and equipment. The aim of this study was to develop and implement a pre-induction checklist in order to identify and solve problems before induction of anaesthesia. METHODS: The checklist was developed in a stepwise manner using a modified Delphi technique, literature search, expert's opinion, and a pilot version, and then implemented in a clinical environment during a 13-week study period. Each list was registered and analysed using statistical process control. The checklist was mandatory, but emergency cases were excluded. RESULTS: The checklist, containing 26 items, was used in 502 (61%) of a total of 829 inductions. Eighty-five checklists (17%) identified one or more missing items. The number of missing items decreased significantly throughout the study period. The most important missing items were lack of a second laryngoscope available, introducer not having been fitted to the endotracheal tube, the endotracheal tube cuff not having been tested, and no separate ventilation bag being available. It took a median of 88.5 s (range 52-118) to perform the checklist when no items were missing. The pre-induction time was the same before and after the checklist was introduced (25.1 vs. 24.3 min, P50.25). CONCLUSIONS: It is possible to develop, introduce, and use a pre-induction checklist even in a hectic and stressful clinical environment. The checklist identified and reduced a surprisingly large number of missing items required in a standard induction protocol.

Does the horizontal position increase risk of rescue death following suspension trauma?

BACKGROUND: It is widely believed that placing a patient who has been subjected to suspension trauma in a horizontal position after rescue may cause rescue death. The discussion whether position is important has been dominated by non-medical personnel. Subsequently, this has led to a general advice on emergency treatment of these patients, which may cause incorrect or even fatal treatment. METHODS: To determine whether there is any medical evidence supporting that horizontal positioning after suspension trauma may cause rescue death, the authors located publications, reports, expert opinions and other sources of information addressing the acute treatment of suspension trauma. These sources were then evaluated. RESULTS: Several thousand hits regarding suspension trauma were located on the internet and five articles on the PubMed. Although most of them warned of the dangers of rescue death brought about by assuming the horizontal position after prolonged suspension, the authors found no clinical studies, and none of the sources offered any conclusive evidence as to whether the horizontal position increases the risk of rescue death. Neither the authors, nor the suspension trauma experts who were contacted, had ever experienced or heard of case reports supporting the causal relation between the horizontal position and rescue death. CONCLUSIONS: After evaluating the current literature, the authors found no support for the view that the horizontal position may be potentially fatal for patients exposed to suspension trauma. In the absence of any evidence to the contrary, the authors suggest that the initial management of patients who have had suspension trauma should follow normal guidelines for the acute care of traumatised patients, without special modifications.

Chromosome analysis and cell cytology in effusions. A comparative study.

Chromosome analysis and conventional cytology have been done on serous effusions from 35 patients, 21 of whom had a final clinical diagnosis of malignant disease and 14 of non-malignant disease. Sixteen of the malignant cases were previously untreated. Cytology disclosed nine cases as malignant, three as suspect malignant and nine as normal. The comparable figures for chromosome analysis were 14 malignant, two suspect malignant, and five normal. Neither of the methods gave false positive results in the small series of non-malignant disease. In the present study chromosome analysis has thus provided greater diagnostic accuracy than cytology on serous effusions of malignant disorders.