The role of peri-operative cell salvage in instrumented anterior correction of thoracolumbar scoliosis: a case-controlled study.

Anterior scoliosis surgery is associated with potentially high blood loss, usually requiring allogenic transfusion either intra- or post-operatively. Blood loss in this type of surgery has been shown to correlate with surgical and anaesthetic techniques. In our centre the development of specific anaesthetic techniques as well as the routine use of cell salvage has dramatically reduced the rates of allogenic blood transfusion. Specific indications for the use of the cell saver in anterior scoliosis surgery have not been well defined. Previous studies have commented on the benefit from re-infusion of salvaged autologous blood for orthopaedic patients in general, whilst others have shown a negligible advantage specifically in anterior thoraco-lumbar fusion surgery. We carried out a retrospective study of 137 consecutive patients, all of whom underwent instrumented anterior scoliosis correction between March 1999 and September 2004. A study group consisting of 104 patients in whom a cell saver was used was compared with a control group consisting of 33 patients who underwent anterior instrumentation without cell saver. There was no significant difference in the mean ages, extent of surgery and male to female ratio between groups. In the control group 39.4% of patients required allogenic blood transfusion, versus 6.7% in the study group; the difference is statistically significant (p < 0.0001). A significant difference was also noted in post-operative haemoglobin values. The mean post-operative haemoglobin was 9.6 g/dl in the control group, versus 10.2 g/dl in the study group (p = 0.007). Our experience confirms that re-infusion of salvaged autologous blood in anterior scoliosis surgery has a role in the minimisation of postoperative anaemia and allogenic transfusion requirements in this type of surgery.

Dual growing rod technique followed for three to eleven years until final fusion: the effect of frequency of lengthening.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case review of children completing dual growing rod treatment at our institutions. Patients had a minimum of 2 years follow-up. OBJECTIVE: To identify the factors influencing dual growing rod treatment outcome followed to final fusion. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Published reports on dual growing rod technique results for early onset scoliosis demonstrate it to be safe and effective in curve correction and maintenance as well as in allowing spinal growth. METHODS: Between 1990 and 2003, 13 patients with no previous surgery and noncongenital curves underwent final fusion. All had preoperative curve progression over 10 degrees after unsuccessful nonoperative treatment. There were 10 females and 3 males. Average age was 6.6 +/- 2.9 years at initial surgery. There were 3 idiopathic, 1 nonspine congenital anomaly, and 9 syndromic patients. Analysis included age at initial surgery and final fusion, number and frequency of lengthenings, and complications. Radiographic evaluation included changes in Cobb angle, T1-S1 length, and instrumentation length over the treatment period. RESULTS: Cobb angle improved from 81.0 +/- 23 degrees to 35.8 +/- 15 degrees postinitial and 27.7 +/- 17 degrees after final fusion. Average number of lengthenings was 5.2 +/- 3 at an interval of 9.4 +/- 5 months. T1-S1 length increased from 24.4 +/- 3.4 to 29.3 +/- 3.6 cm postinitial and 35.0 +/- 3.7 cm postfinal fusion. Average growth was 1.46 +/- 0.66 cm/year. Those lengthened at

Dual growing rod technique for the treatment of progressive early-onset scoliosis: a multicenter study.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective case review of children treated with dual growing rod technique at our institutions. Patients included had no previous surgery and a minimum of 2 years follow-up from initial surgery. OBJECTIVES: To determine the safety and effectiveness of the previously described dual growing rod technique in achieving and maintaining scoliosis correction while allowing spinal growth. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Historically, the growing rod techniques have used a single rod and the reported results have been variable. There has been no published study exclusively on the results of dual growing rod technique for early-onset scoliosis. METHODS: From 1993 to 2001, 23 patients underwent dual growing rod procedures using pediatric Isola instrumentation and tandem connectors. Diagnoses included infantile and juvenile idiopathic scoliosis, congenital, neuromuscular, and other etiologies. All had curve progression over 10 degrees following unsuccessful bracing or casting. Of 189 total procedures within the treatment period, 151 were lengthenings with an average of 6.6 lengthenings per patient. Analysis included age at initial surgery and final fusion (if applicable), number and frequency of lengthenings, and complications. Radiographic evaluation included measured changes in scoliosis Cobb angle, kyphosis, lordosis, frontal and sagittal balance, length of T1-S1 and instrumentation over the treatment period, and space available for lung ratio. RESULTS: The mean scoliosis improved from 82 degrees (range, 50 degrees-130 degrees) to 38 degrees (range, 13 degrees-66 degrees) after initial surgery and was 36 degrees (range, 4 degrees-53 degrees) at the last follow-up or post-final fusion. T1-S1 length increased from 23.01 (range, 13.80-31.20) to 28.00 cm (range, 19.50-35.50) after initial surgery and to 32.65 cm (range, 25.60-41.00) at last follow-up or post-final fusion with an average T1-S1 length increase of 1.21 cm per year (range, 0.13-2.59). Seven patients reached final fusion. The space available for lung ratio in patients with thoracic curves improved from 0.87 (range, 0.7-1.1) to 1.0 (range, 0.79-1.23, P = 0.01). During the treatment period, complications occurred in 11 of the 23 patients (48%), and they had a total of 13 complications. Four of these patients (17%) had unplanned procedures. Following final fusion, 2 patients required extensions of their fusions because of curve progression and lumbosacral pain. CONCLUSION: The dual growing rod technique is safe and effective. It maintains correction obtained at initial surgery while allowing spinal growth to continue. It provides adequate stability, increases the duration of treatment period, and has an acceptable rate of complication compared with previous reports using the single rod technique.