Why and Where do We Miss Significant Prostate Cancer with Multi-parametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging followed by Magnetic Resonance-guided and Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Biopsy in Biopsy-naïve Men?

BACKGROUND: Knowledge of significant prostate (sPCa) locations being missed with magnetic resonance (MR)- and transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided biopsy (Bx) may help to improve these techniques. OBJECTIVE: To identify the location of sPCa lesions being missed with MR- and TRUS-Bx. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In a referral center, 223 consecutive Bx-naive men with elevated prostate specific antigen level and/or abnormal digital rectal examination were included. Histopathologically-proven cancer locations, Gleason score, and tumor length were determined. INTERVENTION: All patients underwent multi-parametric MRI and 12-core systematic TRUS-Bx. MR-Bx was performed in all patients with suspicion of PCa on multi-parametric MRI (n=142). OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Cancer locations were compared between MR- and TRUS-Bx. Proportions were expressed as percentages, and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals were calculated. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: In total, 191 lesions were found in 108 patients with sPCa. From these lesion 74% (141/191) were defined as sPCa on either MR- or TRUS-Bx. MR-Bx detected 74% (105/141) of these lesions and 61% (86/141) with TRUS-Bx. TRUS-Bx detected more lesions compared with MR-Bx (140 vs 109). However, these lesions were often low risk (39%). Significant lesions missed with MR-Bx most often had involvement of dorsolateral (58%) and apical (37%) segments and missed segments with TRUS-Bx were located anteriorly (79%), anterior midprostate (50%), and anterior apex (23%). CONCLUSIONS: Both techniques have difficulties in detecting apical lesions. MR-Bx most often missed cancer with involvement of the dorsolateral part (58%) and TRUS-Bx with involvement of the anterior part (79%). PATIENT SUMMARY: Both biopsy techniques miss cancer in specific locations within the prostate. Identification of these lesions may help to improve these techniques.

Multiparametric MRI in the diagnosis of prostate cancer - a generational change.

BACKGROUND: Whether a general practitioner (GP) should order prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing for a patient is a question that has been unresolved for 25 years. The authors suggest that the image-based diagnostic pathway, rather than the biopsy-driven diagnostic pathway, will answer this question. OBJECTIVE: This article describes, in non-technical terms, the methodology of prostate imaging with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI), and targeted biopsies of lesions within the prostate. The benefits and risks of the new technology are discussed. DISCUSSION: Accurate anatomical and functional imaging of the prostate gland, and diagnosis of significant (intermediate- and high-risk) prostate cancer, is now becoming available in Australia. However, there is still a learning curve in the implementation of this technology.

Location of Prostate Cancers Determined by Multiparametric and MRI-Guided Biopsy in Patients With Elevated Prostate-Specific Antigen Level and at Least One Negative Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Biopsy.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this article is to identify histopathologically proven prostate cancer locations using MRI followed by MRI-guided biopsy in patients with elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels and at least one negative transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided biopsy session. Our hypothesis is that in this patient group most cancers are located in the anterior portion of the prostate. This may have implications for the biopsy strategy regarding the location of sampling. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study consisted of 872 consecutive men who had undergone MRI-guided prostate biopsy. Inclusion criteria were PSA level greater than or equal to 4 ng/mL, one or more negative TRUS-guided biopsy session, the presence of suspicious lesions on previous multiparametric MRI, and prostate cancer histopathologically proven by MRI-guided biopsy. Thereafter, the location of intermediate- or high-risk cancers and cancers with a maximum cancer core length of 6 mm or longer were determined. The proportion of cancer locations was compared using a chi-square test. One-way ANOVA analyses were performed to compare patient characteristics. RESULTS: Results were presented on both a patient and lesion basis because a single patient can have multiple lesions. In total, 176 of 872 patients met the inclusion criteria. Prostate cancer was detected in 202 of 277 (73%) suspicious lesions. In total, 76% of patients had cancer of the transition zone and anterior fibromuscular stroma. Peripheral zone cancers were found in 30% of the patients, and 6% had cancers in both zones. In 70% of cases (141/202; 95%, CI, 63-76%), lesions were located anteriorly; this included 75% (132/176; 95%, CI, 69-81%) of patients. Intermediate- or high-risk prostate cancer was found in 93% (128/138; 95%, CI, 88-96%) of patients. Of these patients, 73% (94/128; 95%, CI, 66-81%) had anterior involvement. Cancers with a maximum cancer core length of 6 mm or more were more likely to be located in the anterior part of the prostate than were cancers with a core length of less than 6 mm (66% vs 6%). Most cancers 58% (102/176; 95% CI, 51-65%) were found in the mid prostate. Anterior involvement of prostate cancer detected by MRI-guided biopsy was statistically significantly (p = 0.04) higher in patients with two or more negative TRUS-guided biopsy sessions (79%) than in those with one negative TRUS-guided biopsy session (55%). CONCLUSION: Anterior involvement was high (76%) in patients with an elevated PSA level and one or more negative TRUS-guided biopsy session, and the majority of these cancers (93%) were intermediate or high risk.