Low-dose azathioprine and allopurinol versus azathioprine monotherapy in patients with ulcerative colitis (AAUC): An investigator-initiated, open, multicenter, parallel-arm, randomised controlled trial.

Background: Retrospective studies suggest that for patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) combination therapy with low-dose azathioprine and allopurinol (L-AZA/ALLO) may result in higher remission rates than monotherapy with azathioprine (AZA). We prospectively investigated the effects of these drugs for remission in patients with moderate-to-severe UC. Methods: Open-label, unblinded, randomised, controlled, investigator-initiated, multicentre study conducted at eight hospital sites in Denmark. Adult patients with established UC, who were steroid dependent/refractory, thiopurine naïve, had a normal thiopurine methyltransferase, and achieved remission with steroids or infliximab were eligible for inclusion. Patients were randomly assigned by the investigators (1:1) to 52 weeks of treatment with once daily oral AZA (median dose 50 mg) combined with ALLO 100 mg versus AZA monotherapy (median dose 200 mg), using a computer-generated randomisation list with blocks of six. The trial was open without masking. All randomised patients who received at least one dose of study drug were included in primary and safety analyses (intention to treat population). The primary outcome was steroid and infliximab free remission after 52 weeks, defined as a Mayo Score of ≤1 and no rectal bleeding. The trial is completed and is registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03101800). Findings: Between January 9, 2017 and February 10, 2021, 47 patients were randomised to l-AZA/ALLO and 42 to AZA and received at least one dose of the study drug. After 52 weeks, 20 of 47 (43%) patients in the l-AZA/ALLO group and nine of 42 (21%) patients in the AZA group achieved remission (odds ratio 2·54 [95% CI 1·00 to 6.78, p < 0·048]). Fourteen patients (30%) in the l-AZA/ALLO group and 16 (38%) in the AZA group were withdrawn from the study due to adverse events. Interpretation: This study suggests that after one year l-AZA/ALLO therapy may be associated with a beneficial effect on steroid- and infliximab-free clinical remission in patients with moderate-to-severe UC and should be considered as first line therapy. Funding: Funding for AAUC was provided by The Capital Region of Denmark (Regionernes Medicinpulje (6062/16)).

Impact of thiopurine discontinuation at anti-tumour necrosis factor initiation in inflammatory bowel disease treatment: a nationwide Danish cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Escalation to anti-tumour necrosis factor (anti-TNF) in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients on thiopurine is a common clinical scenario. However, the impact of discontinuing thiopurine at escalation is unclear. AIM: To assess the impact of discontinuing versus continuing thiopurine therapy at anti-TNF initiation. METHODS: We used the Danish registries to establish a national cohort of patients with IBD on thiopurine therapy prior to initiating anti-TNF from 2003 to 2018. We compared patients discontinuing thiopurine therapy within 90 days of anti-TNF initiation to those continuing. Our primary outcome was a composite of any new oral corticosteroid use, IBD-related hospitalization, surgery or death. We used Cox regression models to calculate adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: Of the 10,352 anti-TNF exposed patients, 2,630 (1590 Crohn's disease (CD) and 1040 ulcerative colitis (UC)) received thiopurines prior to anti-TNF. After anti-TNF initiation, 979 patients discontinued thiopurines. Discontinuing thiopurines within 90 days of anti-TNF initiation, increased the risk of the primary outcome (aHR: 1.22; 95% CI: 1.10-1.36), particularly for IBD-related hospitalization (aHR: 1.14; 95% CI: 1.00-1.31) and oral corticosteroid use (aHR: 1.27; 95% CI: 1.13-1.44). This increased risk of the primary outcome was seen in both CD (aHR: 1.17; 95% CI 1.02-1.34) and UC (aHR: 1.32; 95% CI: 1.12-1.55). CONCLUSIONS: In a nationwide cohort study of IBD patients, we observed that discontinuing thiopurines after anti-TNF initiation was associated with an increased risk of adverse outcomes, in particular an increase in hospitalizations. Further interventional studies exploring this common clinical scenario are required.

Outcome of concomitant treatment with thiopurines and allopurinol in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: A nationwide Danish cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Thiopurine and allopurinol in combination are associated with clinical remission in inflammatory bowel diseases but their influence on subsequent outcomes is unclear. We compared outcomes during exposure to both thiopurines and allopurinol versus thiopurines alone. METHODS: We established a nationwide cohort of patients with inflammatory bowel diseases exposed to thiopurines ± allopurinol during 1999-2014, using registry data. Patients were followed until hospitalization, surgery, anti-TNFα, or death (as a primary composite outcome). We used Poisson regression analyses to calculate incidence rate ratios overall and stratified by calendar period (assuming the combined exposure was unintended before 2009). RESULTS: A total of 10,367 patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (Crohn's disease, n = 5484; ulcerative colitis, n = 4883) received thiopurines. Of these, 217 (2.1%) also received allopurinol. During 24,714 person years of follow-up, we observed 40 outcomes among thiopurine-allopurinol-exposed patients, and 4745 outcomes among those who were thiopurine exposed; incidence rate ratio, 1.26 (95% confidence interval, 0.92-1.73). The incidence rate ratios decreased over time: 4.88 (95% confidence interval 2.53-9.45) for 1999-2003, 2.19 (95% confidence interval, 1.17-4.09) for 2004-2008 and 0.80 (95% confidence interval, 0.52-1.23) for 2009-2014. CONCLUSION: Our nationwide inflammatory bowel disease cohort study shows that concomitant thiopurine-allopurinol is as safe to use as thiopurines alone, with a tendency towards a positive effect on clinical outcomes in recent calendar periods when combined use was intended.

Validation of the 'United Registries for Clinical Assessment and Research' [UR-CARE], a European Online Registry for Clinical Care and Research in Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

BACKGROUND: The 'United Registries for Clinical Assessment and Research' [UR-CARE] database is an initiative of the European Crohn's and Colitis Organisation [ECCO] to facilitate daily patient care and research studies in inflammatory bowel disease [IBD]. Herein, we sought to validate the database by using fictional case histories of patients with IBD that were to be entered by observers of varying experience in IBD. METHODS: Nineteen observers entered five patient case histories into the database. After 6 weeks, all observers entered the same case histories again. For each case history, 20 key variables were selected to calculate the accuracy for each observer. We assumed that the database was such that ≥ 90% of the entered data would be correct. The overall proportion of correctly entered data was calculated using a beta-binomial regression model to account for inter-observer variation and compared to the expected level of validity. Re-test reliability was assessed using McNemar's test. RESULTS: For all case histories, the overall proportion of correctly entered items and their confidence intervals included the target of 90% (Case 1: 92% [88-94%]; Case 2: 87% [83-91%]; Case 3: 93% [90-95%]; Case 4: 97% [94-99%]; Case 5: 91% [87-93%]). These numbers did not differ significantly from those found 6 weeks later [NcNemar's test p > 0.05]. CONCLUSION: The UR-CARE database appears to be feasible, valid and reliable as a tool and easy to use regardless of prior user experience and level of clinical IBD experience. UR-CARE has the potential to enhance future European collaborations regarding clinical research in IBD.