Long-term quality of life is better after laparoscopic compared to open pancreatoduodenectomy.

BACKGROUND: Three randomized controlled trials have reported improved functional recovery after Laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy (LPD), as compared to open pancreatoduodenectomy (OPD). Long-term results regarding quality of life (QoL) are lacking. The aim of this study was to compare long-term QoL of LPD versus OPD. METHODS AND PATIENTS: A monocentric retrospective cross-sectional study was performed among patients < 75 years old who underwent LPD or OPD for a benign or premalignant pathology in a high-volume center (2011-2021). An electronic three-part questionnaire was sent to eligible patients, including two diseases specific QoL questionnaires (the European Organization for Research and Treatment in Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for cancer (QLQ-C30) and a pancreatic cancer module (PAN26) and a body image questionnaire. Patient demographics and postoperative data were collected and compared between LPD and OPD. RESULTS: Among 948 patients who underwent PD (137 LPD, 811 OPD), 170 were eligible and 111 responded (58 LPD and 53 OPD). LPD versus OPD showed no difference in mean age (51 vs. 55 years, p = 0.199) and female gender (40% vs. 45%, p = 0.631), but LPD showed lower BMI (24 vs 26; p = 0.028) and higher preoperative pancreatitis (29% vs 13%; p = 0.041). The postoperative outcome showed similar Clavien-Dindo ≥ III morbidity (19% vs. 23%; p = 0.343) and length of stay (24 vs. 21 days, p = 0.963). After a similar median follow-up (3 vs. 3 years; p = 0.122), LPD vs OPD patients reported higher QoL (QLQ-C30: 49.6 vs 56.3; p = 0.07), better pancreas specific health status score (PAN20: 50.5 vs 55.5; p = 0.002), physical functioning (p = 0.002), and activities limitations (p = 0.02). Scar scores were better after LPD regarding esthetics (p = 0.001), satisfaction (p = 0.04), chronic pain at rest (p = 0.036), moving (p = 0.011) or in daily activities (p = 0.02). There was no difference in digestive symptoms (p = 0.995). CONCLUSION: This monocentric study found improved long-term QoL in patients undergoing LPD, as compared to OPD, for benign and premalignant diseases. These results could be considered when choosing the surgical approach in these patients.

Impact of Crohn's disease on obstetrical management.

OBJECTIVE: Patients with Crohn's disease (CD) may have perineal lesions or a history of anorectal surgery that raise concerns about complications during delivery resulting in a discussion of cesarean section. Our objective was to study the impact of CD on the mode of delivery. METHOD: We conducted a retrospective study between 2005 and 2019 of the pregnancy outcomes of patients with CD. The primary endpoint was the performance of a cesarean section for a reason related to CD. RESULTS: Among 76 consecutive pregnancies, 19 patients underwent CD-related cesarean section (25%). The main element associated with scheduling a cesarean section was the existence of perineal involvement in 94.7% of cases, compared to 12.3% in the rest of the CD population (p<0.05). The perineal lesions most often involved were fistulas (47.4% versus 1.7%; p = 0.042). There was a history of perineal surgery in 78.9% of cases in the cesarean group vs 10,5% (p < 0.05) and a history of obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) in 10.5% of cases vs. 0 (p = 0.047). In women who gave birth vaginally, there were 17.9% episiotomy and one case of OASI (2.6%). CONCLUSION: The factors that influenced the choice of delivery route were perineal damage, history of perineal surgery and history of OASI.