Use of the TD50 99 % CI for single dose rodent carcinogenicity studies.

The Tumorigenic dose 50 (TD50) is a widely used measure of carcinogenic potency representing the dosage at which 50 % of animals exposed to a compound will develop tumours. The popularity of the TD50 is in part due to the large amount of publicly available data. TD50s were calculated for a large number of compounds in the Carcinogenic Potency Database, which has since been extended in the freely available Lhasa Carcinogenicity database, containing TD50s from over 7500 studies and 1700 compounds. However, due to the age of these studies many are of low quality, often comprising only a single test dosage, therefore raising questions about the applicability of such TD50 sfor toxicological risk assessment. We investigate whether the lower 99 % confidence interval is sufficient to produce conservative TD50 estimates for these studies.

A deep dive into historical Ames study data for N-nitrosamine compounds.

Mutagenicity data is a core component of the safety assessment data required by regulatory agencies for acceptance of new drug compounds, with the OECD-471 bacterial reverse mutation (Ames) assay most widely used as a primary screen to assess drug impurities for potential mutagenic risk. N-Nitrosamines are highly potent mutagenic carcinogens in rodent bioassays and their recent detection as impurities in pharmaceutical products has sparked increased interest in their safety assessment. Previous literature reports indicated that the Ames test might not be sensitive enough to detect the mutagenic potential of N-nitrosamines in order to accurately predict a risk of carcinogenicity. To explore this hypothesis, public Ames and rodent carcinogenicity data pertaining to the N-nitrosamine class of compounds was collated for analysis. Here we present how variations to the OECD 471-compliant Ames test, including strain, metabolic activation, solvent type and pre-incubation/plate incorporation methods, may impact the predictive performance for carcinogenicity. An understanding of optimal conditions for testing of N-nitrosamines may improve both the accuracy and confidence in the ability of the Ames test to identify potential carcinogens.

Enhancing global and local decision making for chemical safety assessments through increasing the availability of data.

Toxicity safety assessments are a fundamental part of the lifecycle of products and aim to protect human health and the environment from harmful exposures to chemical substances. To make decisions regarding the suitability of testing strategies, the applicability of individual tests or concluding an assessment for an individual chemical requires data. This review outlines how different forms of data sharing, from enhancing publicly-available data to extracting knowledge from commercially-sensitive data, leads to increased quantity and quality of evidence being available for safety assessors to review. This can result in more confident decisions for different use cases in the context of chemical safety assessments. Although a number of challenges remain with progressing the evolution of toxicity safety assessments, data sharing should be considered as a key approach to accelerating the development and uptake of new best practices.

Use of the bacterial reverse mutation assay to predict carcinogenicity of N-nitrosamines.

Under ICH M7, impurities are assessed using the bacterial reverse mutation assay (i.e., Ames test) when predicted positive using in silico methodologies followed by expert review. N-Nitrosamines (NAs) have been of recent concern as impurities in pharmaceuticals, mainly because of their potential to be highly potent mutagenic carcinogens in rodent bioassays. The purpose of this analysis was to determine the sensitivity of the Ames assay to predict the carcinogenic outcome with curated proprietary Vitic (n = 131) and Leadscope (n = 70) databases. NAs were selected if they had corresponding rodent carcinogenicity assays. Overall, the sensitivity/specificity of the Ames assay was 93-97% and 55-86%, respectively. The sensitivity of the Ames assay was not significantly impacted by plate incorporation (84-89%) versus preincubation (82-89%). Sensitivity was not significantly different between use of rat and hamster liver induced S9 (80-93% versus 77-96%). The sensitivity of the Ames is high when using DMSO as a solvent (87-88%). Based on the analysis of these databases, the Ames assay conducted under OECD 471 guidelines is highly sensitive for detecting the carcinogenic hazards of NAs.

Utilisation of parametric methods to improve percentile-based estimates for the carcinogenic potency of nitrosamines.

N-Nitrosamines have recently been the subject of intense regulatory scrutiny, including the setting of low exposure limits (18 ng/day) (European Medicines Agency (EMA), 2020). This paper evaluates different methodologies to determine statistically robust bounds on the carcinogenic potency of chemical classes, using historic TD50 data (Peto et al., 1984; Thresher et al., 2019) and exemplified for N-nitrosamines. Initially, the distribution of TD50 values (TD50s) for N-nitrosamines of known potency was characterised. From this, it is possible to compare parametric and non-parametric methods to obtain percentiles of interest from the distribution of TD50s, which are shown to be robust to uncertainty in the initial TD50 estimates. These methods may then be applied to different chemical subclasses. The values obtained may be of use in refining acceptable intakes for N-nitrosamines and their subclasses.

The importance of expert review to clarify ambiguous situations for (Q)SAR predictions under ICH M7.

The use of in silico predictions for the assessment of bacterial mutagenicity under the International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) M7 guideline is recommended when two complementary (quantitative) structure-activity relationship (Q)SAR models are used. Using two systems may increase the sensitivity and accuracy of predictions but also increases the need to review predictions, particularly in situations where results disagree. During the 4th ICH M7/QSAR Workshop held during the Joint Meeting of the 6th Asian Congress on Environmental Mutagens (ACEM) and the 48th Annual Meeting of the Japanese Environmental Mutagen Society (JEMS) 2019, speakers demonstrated their approaches to expert review using 20 compounds provided ahead of the workshop that were expected to yield ambiguous (Q)SAR results. Dr. Chris Barber presented a selection of the reviews carried out using Derek Nexus and Sarah Nexus provided by Lhasa Limited. On review of these compounds, common situations were recognised and are discussed in this paper along with standardised arguments that may be used for such scenarios in future.

Are all nitrosamines concerning? A review of mutagenicity and carcinogenicity data.

The control of potentially mutagenic impurities in pharmaceutical products is of key importance in assessing carcinogenic risk to humans. The recent discovery of nitrosamine impurities in several marketed pharmaceuticals has increased interest in their mutagenic and carcinogenic potential. This chemical class is considered part of a 'cohort of concern', indicating that standard control protocols, such as the use of a threshold of toxicological concern (TTC), cannot be applied. Whilst some nitrosamines are known to be exceptionally potent carcinogens, it's not clear whether this is a property of all members of the class. To investigate the mutagenic and carcinogenic potential of nitrosamines, data was extracted from published literature to augment that already present in the Vitic and Lhasa Carcinogenicity Databases. This data was analysed to assess the application of the ICH M7 guideline to nitrosamine impurities, with respect to the predictivity of the Ames test for carcinogenic potential and the distribution of carcinogenic potency. It was found that 18% of nitrosamines were considered non-carcinogenic. Nitrosamines showed a greater correlation between mutagenicity and carcinogenicity compared to non-nitrosamine compounds. Whilst nitrosamines, in general, are more potent carcinogens than non-nitrosamines, there is a significant overlap between the two distributions of TD50s for each class.

Generation of TD50 values for carcinogenicity study data.

Carcinogenic potency is a key factor in the understanding of chemical risk assessment. Measures of carcinogenic potency, for example TD50, are instrumental in the determination of metrics such as the threshold of toxicological concern (TTC), acceptable intake (AI) and permitted daily exposure (PDE), which in turn impact on human exposure. The Carcinogenic Potency Data Base (CPDB) has provided a source of study information, complete with calculated TD50 values. However, this is no longer actively updated. An understanding of carcinogenic potency, which can be derived from dose-response data, can be used as part of human risk assessments to generate safety thresholds under which cancer risk is judged to be minimal. The aim of this paper is to produce a transparent methodology for calculating TD50 values from experimental data in a manner consistent with the CPDB. This was then applied across the same data as used in the CPDB and analysis done on the correlation with the CPDB TD50 values. While the two sets of values showed a high level of correlation overall, there were some significant discrepancies. These were predominantly due to a lack of clarity in the CPDB methodology and inappropriate use of a linear model in TD50 calculation where the data was not suitable for such an approach.