Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Crit Pathw Cardiol ; 20(3): 163-167, 2021 09 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33606413

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (AMICS) is associated with high mortality. Patients ≥75 years old represent an increasing proportion of those who present with AMICS and are at high risk for adverse outcomes. METHODS: The National Cardiogenic Shock Initiative includes patients with AMICS treated using a standard shock protocol with early invasive hemodynamic monitoring, mechanical circulatory support (MCS), and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We evaluated the outcomes of patients based on their age group, dividing them into <75 and ≥75 years old. RESULTS: We included 300 consecutive patients: 238 were <75 years old (79.3%) and 62 patients ≥75 years old. There were significant differences in survival; patients <75 years old had a 75.6% survival, while those ≥75 years old had a 50% survival (adjusted OR: 10.4, P = 0.001). SCAI shock classification impacted survival as well; those <75 years old with class C or D shock had a survival of 84%, compared with 57% in those ≥75 years old. Patients ≥75 years old requiring 1 or 2 vasopressors had significantly lower survival rates (36% and 25%, respectively) when compared with patients <75 years old (76.7% with 1 and 60.5% with >1 vasopressor). CONCLUSIONS: Age is inversely proportional to survival; patients <75 years old have high rates of survival if treated using best practices with invasive hemodynamic monitoring, early MCS, and PCI. However, using a standardized protocol can improve survival in the elderly; therefore, age on its own should not be a reason to withhold PCI or MCS use.


Assuntos
Coração Auxiliar , Infarto do Miocárdio , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Idoso , Humanos , Infarto do Miocárdio/complicações , Infarto do Miocárdio/epidemiologia , Infarto do Miocárdio/terapia , Choque Cardiogênico/epidemiologia , Choque Cardiogênico/terapia , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Curr Atheroscler Rep ; 10(2): 134-41, 2008 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18417068

RESUMO

The prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is growing at an alarming rate and reaching epidemic proportions, and cardiovascular disease continues to be one of the leading causes of death in the United States. The key relationship between these two diseases (knowing that T2DM is a strong risk factor for cardiovascular disease) is insulin resistance and the detrimental effect it has on macrovasculature. Thiazolidinediones (TZDs) are peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaagonists that are beneficial in the treatment of T2DM and have the added benefit of modifying lipid profiles. This review discusses the basic science linking insulin resistance to atherosclerosis and describes the major TZD trials in the recent literature. It also addresses the clinical implications of these studies and media scrutiny surrounding the recent controversial report that TZDs may be linked to an increased risk of myocardial infarction.


Assuntos
Doença da Artéria Coronariana/tratamento farmacológico , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/fisiopatologia , Resistência à Insulina , PPAR gama/antagonistas & inibidores , Tiazolidinedionas/uso terapêutico , Animais , Reestenose Coronária/prevenção & controle , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamento farmacológico , Angiopatias Diabéticas/tratamento farmacológico , Ácidos Graxos não Esterificados/sangue , Ácidos Graxos não Esterificados/fisiologia , Humanos , Hipoglicemiantes/farmacologia , Hipoglicemiantes/uso terapêutico , Resistência à Insulina/fisiologia , Pioglitazona , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Rosiglitazona , Stents , Tiazolidinedionas/farmacologia , Triglicerídeos/sangue
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...