Protein kinase Cα (PKCα) regulates p53 localization and melanoma cell survival downstream of integrin αv in three-dimensional collagen and in vivo.

Protein kinase C α (PKCα) is overexpressed in numerous types of cancer. Importantly, PKCα has been linked to metastasis of malignant melanoma in patients. However, it has been unclear how PKCα may be regulated and how it exerts its role in melanoma. Here, we identified a role for PKCα in melanoma cell survival in a three-dimensional collagen model mimicking the in vivo pathophysiology of the dermis. A pathway was identified that involved integrin αv-mediated up-regulation of PKCα and PKCα-dependent regulation of p53 localization, which was connected to melanoma cell survival. Melanoma survival and growth in three-dimensional microenvironments requires the expression of integrin αv, which acts to suppress p53 activity. Interestingly, microarray analysis revealed that PKCα was up-regulated by integrin αv in a three-dimensional microenvironment-dependent manner. Integrin αv was observed to promote a relocalization of endogenous p53 from the nucleus to the cytoplasm upon growth in three-dimensional collagen as well as in vivo, whereas stable knockdown of PKCα inhibited the integrin αv-mediated relocalization of p53. Importantly, knockdown of PKCα also promoted apoptosis in three-dimensional collagen and in vivo, resulting in reduced tumor growth. This indicates that PKCα constitutes a crucial component of the integrin αv-mediated pathway(s) that promote p53 relocalization and melanoma survival.

PRIMA-1Met/APR-246 induces wild-type p53-dependent suppression of malignant melanoma tumor growth in 3D culture and in vivo.

Disseminating malignant melanoma is a lethal disease highly resistant to radio- and chemotherapy. Therefore, the development of new treatment strategies is strongly needed. Tumor suppressor p53-mediated apoptosis is essential for the response to radio- and chemotherapy. Although p53 is not frequently mutated in melanoma, it is inactivated by integrin αv-mediated signaling, as we previously demonstrated 1, which may account, at least partially, for increased apoptosis resistance of malignant melanoma. In this study we addressed the question whether functional restoration of p53 by APR-246 (PRIMA-1Met), which can reactivate mutant p53 and induce massive apoptosis in cancer cells, is able to restore the function of inactive p53 in melanoma. Using a three-dimensional collagen gel (3D-collagen) to culture melanoma cells carrying wild-type p53, we found that APR-246 treatment resulted in activation of p53, leading to increased expression of p53 pro-apoptotic targets Apaf1 and PUMA and activation of caspase- 9 and -3. Moreover, APR-246 triggered melanoma cell apoptosis that was mediated by p53 and caspase 9. Importantly, APR-246 treatment also suppressed human melanoma xenograft tumors in vivo in a p53-dependent manner. Thus, wild-type p53 reactivation may provide a novel approach for malignant melanoma treatment, with APR-246 as a candidate drug for such a development.

p21-activated kinase 4 phosphorylation of integrin beta5 Ser-759 and Ser-762 regulates cell migration.

Modulation of integrin alphavbeta5 regulates vascular permeability, angiogenesis, and tumor dissemination. In addition, we previously found a role for p21-activated kinase 4 (PAK4) in selective regulation of integrin alphavbeta5-mediated cell motility (Zhang, H., Li, Z., Viklund, E. K., and Strömblad, S. (2002) J. Cell Biol. 158, 1287-1297). This report focuses on the molecular mechanisms of this regulation. We here identified a unique PAK4-binding membrane-proximal integrin beta5-SERS-motif involved in controlling cell attachment and migration. We also mapped the integrin beta5-binding site within PAK4. We found that PAK4 binding to integrin beta5 was not sufficient to promote cell migration, but that PAK4 kinase activity was required for PAK4 promotion of cell motility. Importantly, PAK4 specifically phosphorylated the integrin beta5 subunit at Ser-759 and Ser-762 within the beta5-SERS-motif. Point mutation of these two serine residues abolished the PAK4-induced cell migration, indicating a functional role for these phosphorylations in migration. Our results may give important leads to the functional regulation of integrin alphavbeta5, with implications for vascular permeability, angiogenesis, and cancer dissemination.

Anchorage-independent cytokinesis as part of oncogenic transformation?

Cell anchorage to the extracellular matrix (ECM) controls the cell proliferation in all multicellular organisms and the abrogation of this control is an indicator of cellular transformation. In fact, two distinct periods of the cell cycle are subject to anchorage-dependent regulation. Firstly, anchorage exerts an extensive control of the G(1)-phase, a control that we found to be more rigorous than for example the control by growth factors. Secondly, anchorage regulates the progression through cytokinesis. In order to achieve anchorage-independent growth a cell must circumvent these controls. To this end, we recently found that oncogenic H-RasV12 can provide sufficient signals to overcome the anchorage-dependence for cytokinesis. Together with earlier findings on G(1)-phase control, this demonstrates that oncogenic signaling contributes to de-regulation of anchorage-dependence during both the G(1)-phase and the cytokinesis. This also suggests that de-regulated cytokinesis may be part of oncogenic transformation.

Oncogenic H-Ras V12 promotes anchorage-independent cytokinesis in human fibroblasts.

Cell anchorage is required for cell proliferation of untransformed cells, whereas anchorage-independent growth can be induced by oncogenes and is a hallmark of transformation. Whereas anchorage-dependent control of the progression of the G(1) phase of the cell cycle has been extensively studied, it is less clear whether and how anchorage may control other cell cycle phases and whether oncogenes may affect such controls. Here, we found that lack of cell anchorage did not influence progression through the cell cycle S phase, G(2) phase, or most of mitosis of primary human fibroblasts. However, unanchored fibroblasts could not complete cytokinesis. The cleavage furrow and central spindle were still formed in the absence of anchorage, but cells were unable to complete ingression, causing binucleation. Importantly, V12 H-Ras-transformed fibroblasts and two cancer cell lines progressed through the entire cell cycle without anchorage, including through cytokinesis. This indicates that oncogenic signaling may contribute to anchorage-independent growth and tumorigenesis by promoting the final cleavage furrow ingression during cytokinesis.

Retinoblastoma susceptibility gene product (pRb) and p107 functionally separate the requirements for serum and anchorage in the cell cycle G1-phase.

Growth factors and cell anchorage are both required for cell cycle G(1)-phase progression, but it is unclear whether their function is mediated through the same set of cell cycle components and whether they are both required during the same periods of time. We separately analyzed the requirements of serum and anchorage during G(1)-phase progression and found that human dermal fibroblasts as well as wild type, pRb(-/-), and p107(-/-) mouse embryonic fibroblasts needed serum (growth factors) until mid-G(1)-phase but required cell anchorage until late G(1)-phase to be competent for S-phase entry. Importantly, however, pRb/p107 double-null mouse embryonic fibroblasts lacked serum requirement in mid-G(1)-phase but still required cell anchorage until late G(1)-phase to enter S-phase. Our results indicate that pRb and p107 do not constitute the last control point for extracellular factors during G(1)-phase progression, and they functionally separate the requirements for serum and cell anchorage in terms of involved cell cycle components.

Cell attachment to the extracellular matrix induces proteasomal degradation of p21(CIP1) via Cdc42/Rac1 signaling.

The cyclin-dependent kinase 2 (Cdk2) inhibitors p21(CIP1) and p27(KIP1) are negatively regulated by anchorage during cell proliferation, but it is unclear how integrin signaling may affect these Cdk2 inhibitors. Here, we demonstrate that integrin ligation led to rapid reduction of p21(CIP1) and p27(KIP1) protein levels in three distinct cell types upon attachment to various extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins, including fibronectin (FN), or to immobilized agonistic anti-integrin monoclonal antibodies. Cell attachment to FN did not rapidly influence p21(CIP1) mRNA levels, while the protein stability of p21(CIP1) was decreased. Importantly, the down-regulation of p21(CIP1) and p27(KIP1) was completely blocked by three distinct proteasome inhibitors, demonstrating that integrin ligation induced proteasomal degradation of these Cdk2 inhibitors. Interestingly, ECM-induced proteasomal proteolysis of a ubiquitination-deficient p21(CIP1) mutant (p21K6R) also occurred, showing that the proteasomal degradation of p21(CIP1) was ubiquitin independent. Concomitant with our finding that the small GTPases Cdc42 and Rac1 were activated by attachment to FN, constitutively active (ca) Cdc42 and ca Rac1 promoted down-regulation of p21(CIP1). However, dominant negative (dn) Cdc42 and dn Rac1 mutants blocked the anchorage-induced degradation of p21(CIP1), suggesting that an integrin-induced Cdc42/Rac1 signaling pathway activates proteasomal degradation of p21(CIP1). Our results indicate that integrin-regulated proteasomal proteolysis might contribute to anchorage-dependent cell cycle control.