Barriers and enablers to physical activity for individuals living with traumatic brain injury: a mixed methods systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Despite well-documented benefits of physical activity (PA), people with brain injury face numerous PA barriers. This mixed methods systematic review aimed to summarize barriers and enablers that individuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI) experience when participating in PA. METHODS: Primary studies investigating barriers and/or enablers to PA in adults living with TBI were included. Literature search in MEDLINE, EmCare, Embase, PsychINFO, PEDro, and OTSeeker was initially conducted in December 2021 and January 2022, and updated in June 2022. Methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tools. A customized data extraction form was utilized. Descriptive synthesis was used to summarize the findings. RESULTS: Twelve studies of various methodological qualities were identified. Barriers to PA included personal issues, changing health status, external factors, lack of support, and lack of knowledge. Identified enablers included personal drivers, social support, professional support, accessibility, and education. CONCLUSIONS: The shared similarities between barriers and enablers across several themes suggest that multiple barriers may be amenable to change. Given the diverse barriers to PA, health professionals should use person-centered, holistic approach with ongoing review and monitoring, when engaging with individuals with TBI.

The Effectiveness of Public Awareness Initiatives Aimed at Encouraging the Use of Evidence-Based Recommendations by Health Professionals: A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVES: Public awareness initiatives have attracted growing attention globally, as a strategy to reduce low-value care and disinformation. However, knowledge gap remains in determining their effects. The aim of this systematic review was to summarize existing evidence to date on global effectiveness of public awareness initiatives. METHODS: Primary quantitative studies focusing on passive delivery of public awareness initiatives that targeted health professionals were included. Eligible studies were identified through search of MEDLINE, Embase, Emcare, the Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, Business Source Complete, Emerald Insight, and Google (initially on December 19, 2018, followed by updated search between July 8-10, 2019, and then between March 8-9, 2022) and the reference list of relevant studies. Methodological quality of included studies was assessed using modified McMaster critical appraisal tool. A narrative synthesis of the study outcomes was conducted. RESULTS: Twenty studies from United States, United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, and multicountry were included. Nineteen studies focused on Choosing Wisely initiative and one focused on National Institute of Clinical Excellence reminders. Most studies investigated one recommendation of a specialty. The findings showed conflicting evidence on the effectiveness of public awareness initiatives, suggesting passive delivery has limited success in reducing low-value care among health professionals. CONCLUSIONS: This review highlights the complexity of change in an established practice pattern in health care. As passive delivery of public awareness initiatives has limited potential to initiate and sustain change, wide-ranging intervention components need to be integrated for a successful implementation.

Characteristics of perceived effective telesupervision practices: A case study of supervisees and supervisors.

INTRODUCTION: Many healthcare workers have switched from face-to-face clinical supervision to telesupervision since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Given the rise in prevalence of telesupervision and continuing remote working arrangements, telesupervision is no longer only limited to rural areas. As this remains an under-investigated area, this study aimed to explore supervisor and supervisee first hand experiences of effective telesupervision. METHODS: A case study approach combining in-depth interviews of supervisors and supervisees, and document analysis of supervision documentation was used. De-identified interview data were analysed through a reflective thematic analysis approach. RESULTS: Three supervisor-supervisee pairs from occupational therapy and physiotherapy provided data. Data analysis resulted in the development of four themes: Benefits vs limitations and risks, not often a solo endeavour, importance of face-to-face contact, and characteristics of effective telesupervision. DISCUSSION: Findings of this study have confirmed that telesupervision is suited to supervisees and supervisors with specific characteristics, who can navigate the risks and limitations of this mode of clinical supervision. Healthcare organisations can ensure availability of evidence-informed training on effective telesupervision practices, as well as investigate the role of blended supervision models to mitigate some risks of telesupervision. Further studies could investigate the effectiveness of utilising additional professional support strategies that complement telesupervision, including in nursing and medicine, and ineffective telesupervision practices.

The effectiveness of reflexology on mental health in cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The current body of research examining the effectiveness of reflexology in patients with cancer have predominantly focused on managing physical symptoms and treatment side effects. This review aimed to synthesise evidence from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) examining the effectiveness of reflexology on mental health outcomes in people with cancer. METHODS: RCTs published in English and measuring stress, anxiety, depression or quality of life (QoL) were included. Eligible RCTs were identified through search of MEDLINE, Embase, Emcare, PsycINFO, Scopus, the Cochrane Library, OTseeker, PEDro (18 June 2021) and Google and Google Scholar (21 June 2021). The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme Randomised Controlled Trials Checklist was used to assess risk of bias. Meta-analysis and narrative synthesis were undertaken. The certainty of evidence was assessed by using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) framework. RESULTS: Fifteen RCTs (1356 adult participants) were included. Evidence for stress and anxiety (primary outcomes), as well as depression and QoL (secondary outcomes), were mixed and conflicting. The certainty of the evidence was low to very low. CONCLUSION: An unequivocal recommendation supporting reflexology cannot be made. Greater utilisation of well-established reporting guidelines, together with increased investment in well-designed, high-quality clinical research are required.

The impacts of and outcomes from telehealth delivered in prisons: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: While the delivery of healthcare services within prison systems is underpinned by different models, access to timely and optimal healthcare is often constrained by multifaceted factors. Telehealth has been used as an alternative approach to conventional care. To date, much of the focus has been on evaluation of telehealth interventions within certain geographical contexts such as rural and remote communities. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review was to synthesise the evidence base to date for the impacts of, and outcomes from, telehealth delivered in prisons. METHODS: This systematic review was underpinned by best practice in the conduct and reporting of systematic reviews. A systematic search was conducted to reinforce the literature selection process. The modified McMaster Critical Appraisal Tool was used to assess the methodological quality of the included studies. A narrative synthesis of the study outcomes was undertaken. RESULTS: Twenty-nine quantitative studies were included. Telehealth interventions were greatly varied in terms of types of healthcare services, implementation process and intervention parameters. Methodological concerns such as rigour in data collection and analysis, and psychometric properties of outcome measures were commonly identified. Process-related outcomes and telehealth outcomes were the two overarching categories identified. CONCLUSION: This systematic review provides mixed evidence on the impact of, and outcomes from, telehealth in prisons. While the evidence base does highlight some positive impacts of telehealth, which at the least, is as effective as conventional care while achieving patient satisfaction, it is also important to consider the local context and drivers that may influence what, when and how telehealth services are provided. Addressing critical factors throughout the lifecycle of telehealth is equally important for successful implementation and sustainability.

Barriers to and facilitators of endorsement for scheduled medicines in podiatry: a qualitative descriptive study.

BACKGROUND: Australian podiatrists and podiatric surgeons who have successfully completed the requirements for endorsement for scheduled medicines, as directed by the Podiatry Board of Australia, are eligible to prescribe a limited amount of schedule 2, 3, 4 or 8 medications. Registration to become endorsed for scheduled medicines has been available to podiatrists for over 10 years, yet the uptake of training has remained low (approximately 2% of registered podiatrists/podiatry surgeons). This study aimed to explore barriers to and facilitators of engagement with endorsement for scheduled medicines by podiatrists. METHODS: Qualitative descriptive methodology informed this research. A purposive maximum variation sampling strategy was used to recruit 13 registered podiatrists and a podiatric surgeon who were either endorsed for scheduled medicines, in training or not endorsed. Semi-structured interviews were employed to collate the data which were analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Three overarching super-ordinate themes were identified which encompassed both barriers and facilitators: (1) competence and autonomy, (2) social and workplace influences, and (3) extrinsic motivators. Within these, several prominent sub-themes emerged of importance to the participants including workplace and social networks role in modelling behaviours, identifying mentors, and access to supervised training opportunities. Stage of life and career often influenced engagement. Additionally, a lack of financial incentive, cost and time involved in training, and lack of knowledge of training requirements were influential barriers. Rural podiatrists encountered a considerable number of barriers in most of the identified areas. CONCLUSION: A multitude of barriers and facilitators exist for podiatrists as part of the endorsement for scheduled medicines. The findings suggest that a lack of engagement with endorsement for scheduled medicines training may be assisted by a more structured training process and increasing the number of podiatrists who are endorsed to increase the numbers of role models, mentors, and supervision opportunities. Recommendations are provided for approaches as means of achieving, and sustaining, these outcomes.

"You get exposed to a wider range of things and it can be challenging but very exciting at the same time": enablers of and barriers to transition to rural practice by allied health professionals in Australia.

BACKGROUND: There is consistent evidence highlighting the mal-distribution of the health workforce between urban and rural and remote regions. To date, addressing this mal-distribution has focused on medicine and nursing with limited initiatives targeted at allied health. Therefore, the aim of this research was to explore the enablers of and barriers to transition to rural practice by allied health professionals across South Australia in Australia. METHOD: Qualitative descriptive methodology was used to underpin this research. Individual, in-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted with employers, managers and allied health professionals from rural regions of South Australia who were identified using purposive maximum variation sampling strategy. RESULTS: A total 22 participants shared their perspectives on the enablers of and barriers to transition to rural practice by allied health professionals across South Australia. Thematic analysis of the interview data resulted in a number of key issues impacting transition to rural-based practice. These findings could be broadly categorised into three stages during the transition: 'before'; 'during' and 'after'. DISCUSSION: This study identified a range of enablers of and barriers to transition to rural practice by allied health professionals. Five overarching themes - nature of rural practice, exposure to rural 'taster', social/lifestyle, job availability/characteristics, and mentor and support were identified. In particular, exposure to rural 'taster', social/lifestyle, and mentor and support were the key themes reported by the stakeholders. The multifactorial nature of the barriers and enablers highlight the complexity underpinning how AHPs transition to rural-based practice. These barriers/ enablers are often inter-linked and continually evolving which pose significant challenges for health care stakeholders to successfully addressing these. CONCLUSION: This research sheds light on the complexities that confront and successful strategies that are required for health care stakeholders when considering how best to support allied health professional transition to rural practice.

Impact of treatment summaries for cancer survivors: a systematic review.

PURPOSE: As a treatment summary (TS) documents information for follow-up care, it is believed to be an important communication tool for the patient, their GP, and other health professionals. The aim of this systematic review (SR) was to evaluate the impact of receiving a TS for cancer survivors when compared to receiving standard care and to identify knowledge gaps to inform future research. METHODS: A systematic search of electronic databases and grey literature was undertaken from August 2018 to October 2018. Studies were included if participants (cancer survivors) were over 18 years of age and had received a TS, and if outcomes for TS could be separated from other survivorship interventions. The McMaster Critical Appraisal Tool was used to evaluate the methodological quality of the included studies. A narrative synthesis of the study outcomes was then conducted. RESULTS: Seven studies (one prospective cohort and six cross-sectional studies) met the inclusion criteria. The impact of TS was assessed using widely varied outcomes in these studies. Overall, receipt of a TS was related to greater patient understanding and perception of the quality of care provided. However, caution is required when interpreting these results due to methodological limitations. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review found that TS may have a positive impact on patient understandings about and perceptions of cancer care. However, more robust research including perspectives of cancer survivors is required. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: TS could play an important role for cancer survivors especially in terms of knowledge of cancer care.