Measurement of Cerebral Metabolism Under Non-Chronic Hemodynamic Conditions.

BACKGROUND: Blood flow to the brain is a critical physiological function and is useful to monitor in critical care settings. Despite that, a surrogate is most likely measured instead of actual blood flow. Such surrogates include velocity measurements in the carotid artery and systemic blood pressure, even though true blood flow can actually be obtained using MRI and other modalities. Ultrasound is regularly used to measure blood flow and is, under certain conditions, able to provide quantitative volumetric blood flow in milliliters per minute. Unfortunately, most times the resulting flow data is not valid due to unmet assumptions (such as flow profile and angle correction). Color flow, acquired in three dimensions, has been shown to yield quantitative blood flow without any assumptions (3DVF). METHODS: Here we are testing whether color flow can perform during physiological conditions common to severe injury. Specifically, we are simulating severe traumatic brain injury (epidural hematoma) as well as hemorrhagic shock with 50% blood loss. Blood flow was measured in the carotid artery of a cohort of 7 Yorkshire mix pigs (40-60 kg) using 3DVF (4D16L, LOGIQ 9, GE HealthCare, Milwaukee, WI, USA) and compared to an invasive flow meter (TS420, Transonic Systems Inc., Ithaca, NY, USA). RESULTS: Six distinct physiological conditions were achieved: baseline, hematoma, baseline 2, hemorrhagic shock, hemorrhagic shock plus hematoma, and post-hemorrhage resuscitation. Mean cerebral oxygen extraction ratio varied from 40.6% ± 13.0% of baseline to a peak of 68.4% ± 15.6% during hemorrhagic shock. On average 3DVF estimated blood flow with a bias of -9.6% (-14.3% root mean squared error) relative to the invasive flow meter. No significant flow estimation error was detected during phases of flow reversal, that was seen in the carotid artery during traumatic conditions. The invasive flow meter showed a median error of -11.5% to 39.7%. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that absolute volumetric carotid blood flow to the brain can be obtained and potentially become a more specific biomarker related to cerebral hemodynamics than current surrogate markers.

Transcranial Color-Coded Sonography With Angle Correction As a Screening Tool for Raised Intracranial Pressure.

OBJECTIVES: Transcranial Doppler (TCD) has been evaluated as a noninvasive intracranial pressure (ICP) assessment tool. Correction for insonation angle, a potential source of error, with transcranial color-coded sonography (TCCS) has not previously been reported while evaluating ICP with TCD. Our objective was to study the accuracy of TCCS for detection of ICP elevation, with and without the use of angle correction. DESIGN: Prospective study of diagnostic accuracy. SETTING: Academic neurocritical care unit. PATIENTS: Consecutive adults with invasive ICP monitors. INTERVENTIONS: Ultrasound assessment with TCCS. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: End-diastolic velocity (EDV), time-averaged peak velocity (TAPV), and pulsatility index (PI) were measured in the bilateral middle cerebral arteries with and without angle correction. Concomitant mean arterial pressure (MAP) and ICP were recorded. Estimated cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) was calculated as estimated CPP (CPPe) = MAP × (EDV/TAPV) + 14, and estimated ICP (ICPe) = MAP-CPPe. Sixty patients were enrolled and 55 underwent TCCS. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of ICPe for detection of invasive ICP greater than 22 mm Hg revealed area under the curve (AUC) 0.51 (0.37-0.64) without angle correction and 0.73 (0.58-0.84) with angle correction. The optimal threshold without angle correction was ICPe greater than 18 mm Hg with sensitivity 71% (29-96%) and specificity 28% (16-43%). With angle correction, the optimal threshold was ICPe greater than 21 mm Hg with sensitivity 100% (54-100%) and specificity 30% (17-46%). The AUC for PI was 0.61 (0.47-0.74) without angle correction and 0.70 (0.55-0.92) with angle correction. CONCLUSIONS: Angle correction improved the accuracy of TCCS for detection of elevated ICP. Sensitivity was high, as appropriate for a screening tool, but specificity remained low.

Whole Blood Redox Potential Correlates With Progressive Accumulation of Oxygen Debt and Acts as A Marker of Resuscitation in A Swine Hemorrhagic Shock Model.

INTRODUCTION: Oxidation-reduction reactions involve electron exchanges that require optimal balance for proper cell function. This balance is measured via redox potential and reflects oxidative stress. Despite the critical role of oxidative stress in critical illness and injury, little is known regarding redox potential. We hypothesize redox potential measurements will correlate with accumulation of O2 debt produced by hemorrhage over time. METHODS: Ten swine were studied using a polytrauma hemorrhagic shock model. Whole blood and plasma redox potential measures were obtained at defined stages of O2 debt (20 mL/kg, 40 mL/kg, 60 mL/kg, 80 mL/kg), and through resuscitation. Redox potential was determined by measuring open circuit potential using novel gold nanoporous electrodes with Ag/AgCl reference. RESULTS: Whole blood redox potential showed negative change as O2 debt accumulated, exhibiting positive response during resuscitation, and correlated with O2 debt across all animals (P < 0.001). Redox potential changes throughout O2 debt accrual were significant compared with baseline (P≤0.05), and at end resuscitation compared with O2 debt 60 mL/kg (P = 0.05) and 80 mL/kg (P = 0.02). Whole blood redox potential measures also correlated with oxygen extraction ratio, ScvO2, and lactic acid, appearing very sensitive to acute changes. Plasma redox potential showed no correlation with O2 debt. CONCLUSIONS: Whole blood redox potential demonstrates significant correlation to O2 debt at all stages in this model. These results set the stage for further study of redox potential as a direct measure of oxidative stress and potential clinical tool. Given redox potential plasma performance, these measures should be made in whole blood versus plasma.