Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Pharmacotherapy ; 21(5): 534-9, 2001 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11349742

RESUMO

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare the in vitro performance of an ultrasonic nebulizer and a jet nebulizer in producing a respirable aerosol of tobramycin solution for injection. DESIGN: In vitro observational study DEVICES: Ultrasonic and jet nebulizers. INTERVENTION: Output was determined by measuring the difference in nebulizer weight before and after nebulizing 3 ml of tobramycin injection solution. Mass median aerodynamic diameter (MMAD) and respirable mass were determined by sampling tobramycin aerosol into a cascade impactor. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Mean (SD) output was 1.14 (0.09) ml/minute for the ultrasonic nebulizer and 0.64 (0.08) ml/minute (p<0.001) for the jet nebulizer. Mean MMAD for the jet nebulizer (2.31 [0.10] microm) was less than that of the ultrasonic nebulizer (2.81 [0.17] microm, p<0.001). The majority of tobramycin aerosol produced was in the respirable range for both the ultrasonic (65.1% [4.10%]) and jet (60.6% [0.73%], p=0.008) nebulizers. CONCLUSION: Despite small, clinically unimportant differences in aerosol size and respirable fraction, either device would be acceptable to administer tobramycin injection solution.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Sistemas de Liberação de Medicamentos/instrumentação , Nebulizadores e Vaporizadores , Tobramicina/administração & dosagem , Ultrassom , Aerossóis/administração & dosagem , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Tamanho da Partícula
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...