IgA Vasculitis Following COVID-19 Vaccination: A French Multicenter Case Series Including 12 Patients.

OBJECTIVE: The worldwide coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination campaign triggered several autoimmune diseases. We hereby aimed to describe IgA vasculitis (IgAV) following COVID-19 vaccination. METHODS: We conducted a national, multicenter, retrospective study in France of new-onset adult IgAV diagnosis following COVID-19 vaccination. RESULTS: In total, 12 patients with new-onset IgAV were included. Of these, 5 (41.7%) were women, and the median age was 52.5 (IQR 30.75-60.5) years. Of the 12 patients, 10 had received an mRNA vaccine and 2 had received a viral vector vaccine. The median time from vaccination to onset of symptoms was 11.5 (IQR 4.25-21.25) days. Vasculitis occurred after the first vaccine dose in most patients (n = 8). All patients had skin involvement, with skin necrosis in 4 patients. In total, 7 patients had joint involvement and 2 had arthritis. A total of 4 patients had nonsevere gastrointestinal involvement and 2 had nonsevere renal involvement. The median C-reactive protein level was 26 (IQR 10-66.75) mg/L, the median creatininemia level was 72 (IQR 65-81) µmol/L, and 1 patient had an estimated glomerular filtration rate of less than 60 mL/min at management. All patients received treatment, including 9 patients (75%) who received glucocorticoids. In total, 5 patients received a vaccine dose after developing IgAV, 1 of whom experienced a minor cutaneous relapse. CONCLUSION: The baseline presentation of IgAV following COVID-19 vaccination was mild to moderate, and outcomes were favorable. Thus, a complete COVID-19 vaccination regimen should be completed in this population. Of note, a fortuitous link cannot be ruled out, requiring a worldwide pharmacovigilance search to confirm these findings.

Cluster analysis reveals eosinophilia and fibrosis as poor prognostic markers in 128 patients with eosinophilic fasciitis.

BACKGROUND: Eosinophilic fasciitis (EF) is an extremely rare disease with polymorphic presentation and prognosis. OBJECTIVE: To further investigate EF features. METHODS: We performed a retrospective multicentre study of EF patients from 2013 to 2019, clustered patients using multivariate correspondence analysis, and sought prognosis factors. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-eight patients were included. Sixty-nine (50%) patients had skin sclerosis, and eosinophil count was increased in 71 (55%) patients. Multivariate correspondence analysis identified 3 clusters: a "mild," a "late-onset and hypereosinophilic," and a "fibrotic" cluster. Of 109 patients who followed up for more than 1 year, 49 (45%) presented a relapse, and 48 (44%) had sequelae. Multivariate analysis revealed that eosinophilia (hazard ratio = 1.56; P = .02) and fibrosis (hazard ratio = 4.02; P = .002) were predictive factors of relapse, whereas edema (odds ratio = 0.31; P = .03), relapse (odds ratio = 3.00; P = .04) and fibrosis (odds ratio = 1) were predictive factors of sequelae. Following relapse, treatment modifications consisted of an increase in glucocorticoids in 40 (82%) patients and the addition of methotrexate in 31 (63%) patients. These modifications led to clinical improvement and glucocorticoid withdrawal in 37 (76%) and 22 (45%) patients. LIMITATIONS: Retrospective study. CONCLUSION: EF patients can be divided into 3 homogenous clusters, which, along with fibrosis and eosinophilia, are prognosis factors of relapse and sequelae.

Autoantibodies versus Skin Fibrosis Extent in Systemic Sclerosis: A Case-Control Study of Inverted Phenotypes.

Objective: to describe the prevalences, characteristics, and survivals of patients with anti-topoisomerase 1 antibodies (ATA) and limited cutaneous systemic sclerosis (lSSc) and anti-centromere antibodies (ACA) and diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis (dSSc). Methods: patients with ATA lSSc or with ACA dSSc were included in a case-control retrospective study. Results: In our cohort of scleroderma, the prevalence of ACA dSSc and ATA lSSc was 1.1% (12/1040) and 8.9% (93/1040), respectively. ACA dSSc patients had less interstitial lung disease (ILD) (5 (41.7) vs. 74 (79.6); p < 0.01), more cardiac involvement, and more muscle involvement (3 (25) vs. 4 (4.3); p = 0.03 and 4 (33.3) vs. 4 (7.5); p = 0.02,) than ATA dSSc patients. ATA lSSc patients had a higher modified Rodnan skin score than ACA lSSc patients (4 [2−7.5] vs. 2 [0−5]; p < 0.01) and less cardiac or muscle involvement than ATA dSSc patients (6 (6.5) vs. 19 (20.4%); p < 0.01 and 15 (16.1) vs. 54 (58.1); p < 0.0001, respectively). The cumulative 5-year survival rate was 71% in ACA dSSc patients, 95% in ATA lSSc patients, 84% in ACA lSSc patients, and 66% in ATA dSSc patients (p < 0.0001). Conclusion: ATA lSSc and ACA dSSc have specific characteristics when compared to ATA dSSc or ACA lSSc. ATA lSSc patients have more ILD than ACA lSSc patients, and ATA dSSc patients have the worst prognosis. Overall, inverted phenotypes show the value of a patient assessment combining antibody and skin subset and should be considered as a separate group.