Neonatal meningitis: what is the correlation among cerebrospinal fluid cultures, blood cultures, and cerebrospinal fluid parameters?

BACKGROUND: Meningitis is a substantial cause of morbidity and mortality in neonates. Clinicians frequently use the presence of positive blood cultures to determine whether neonates should undergo lumbar puncture. Abnormal cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) parameters are often used to predict neonatal meningitis and determine length and type of antibiotic therapy in neonates with a positive blood culture and negative CSF culture. METHODS: We evaluated the first lumbar puncture of 9111 neonates at > or =34 weeks' estimated gestational age from 150 NICUs, managed by the Pediatrix Medical Group, Inc. CSF culture results were compared with results of blood cultures and CSF parameters (white blood cells [WBCs], glucose, and protein) to establish the concordance of these values in culture-proven meningitis. CSF cultures positive for coagulase-negative staphylococci and other probable contaminants, as well as fungal and viral pathogens, were excluded from analyses. RESULTS: Meningitis was confirmed by culture in 95 (1.0%) neonates. Of the 95 patients with meningitis, 92 had a documented blood culture. Only 57 (62%) of 92 patients had a concomitant-positive blood culture; 35 (38%) of 92 had a negative blood culture. In neonates with both positive blood and CSF cultures, the organisms isolated were discordant in 2 (3.5%) of 57 cases. In each case, the CSF pathogen required different antimicrobial therapy than the blood pathogen. For culture-proven meningitis, CSF WBC counts of >0 cells per mm3 had sensitivity at 97% and specificity at 11%. CSF WBC counts of >21 cells per mm3 had sensitivity at 79% and specificity at 81%. Culture-proven meningitis was not diagnosed accurately by CSF glucose or by protein. CONCLUSIONS: Neonatal meningitis frequently occurs in the absence of bacteremia and in the presence of normal CSF parameters. No single CSF value can reliably exclude the presence of meningitis in neonates. The CSF culture is critical to establishing the diagnosis of neonatal meningitis.

Neonatal candidiasis: prophylaxis and treatment.

The incidence of candidiasis has risen in neonatal intensive care units as advances in medical therapy have allowed for increased survival of extremely preterm neonates. The mortality of candidiasis has been reported to be 20% by several multi-centre studies. Definitive guidance for prophylaxis and treatment is hindered by lack of large, multi-centre, randomised controlled trials. Systemic prophylaxis is currently not recommended for any neonatal population, and amphotericin B deoxycholate continues to be used as first-line therapy for the treatment of invasive disease.

Current practice regarding the enteral feeding of high-risk newborns with umbilical catheters in situ.

OBJECTIVE: Textbooks recognize the controversy of concomitant enteral nutrition (EN) during umbilical catheter usage in high-risk newborns, but support for the practice varies. There is only one clinical trial examining these practices in a small but randomized, controlled trial of enterally fed newborns with umbilical arterial catheters (UACs) in situ, and that trial did not demonstrate any adverse consequences. We speculate that concomitant EN with umbilical catheter usage is more common than some textbooks suggest-practiced by at least 20% of all US neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). The objective of this study is to determine the prevalence of NICUs where high-risk newborns with UAC or umbilical venous catheter (UVC) placement receive concomitant EN. METHODS: Medical Directors listed in the American Academy of Pediatrics United States Neonatologist and Perinatologist Directory were surveyed by mail. On return of surveys, responses to multiple choice questions were recorded by electronic scanning and validated by manually conducted quality control checks. NICU identities were recorded by code to maintain anonymity. RESULTS: Following 2 requests for survey participation, 70% (549/785) of surveys were returned. Respectively, 82% and 62% of NICUs with and without training programs were represented. On average, surveyed medical directors had practiced neonatal medicine 18.1 +/- 0.3 years. Of surveyed NICUs, 99% reported placement of UVCs and UACs. Of the 92% believing that it is safe to provide trophic EN to newborns with UVCs in place, 51% practiced this some of the time, and 37% practiced it most of the time. By comparison, it was reported that newborns with UACs in place receive trophic EN most of the time (30%), some of the time (49%), or none of the time (22%). Of the 80% believing that it is safe to provide more complete EN to newborns with UVCs in place, 44% practiced this some of the time, and 24% practiced it most of the time. For newborns with UACs in place, more complete EN was provided most of the time (15%), some of the time (36%), or none of the time (49%). CONCLUSIONS: Concurrent UVC and UAC usage with EN is more commonly practiced than suggested in textbooks or published articles. The relative risk-benefit profiles of these practices remain uncertain secondary to the limited number of controlled clinical observations and to the infrequent occurrence of adverse events. A prospective, multicenter, controlled trial would address the continued advisability of these unexpectedly common practices.