Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
2.
BMJ Open ; 7(4): e014634, 2017 04 18.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28420662

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Against a background of failure to prevent neonatal invasive early-onset group B Streptococcus infections (GBS) in our maternity unit using risk-based approach for intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis, we introduced an antenatal GBS carriage screening programme to identify additional women to target for prophylaxis. OBJECTIVES: To describe the implementation and outcome of an antepartum screening programme for prevention of invasive early-onset GBS infection in a UK maternity unit. DESIGN: Observational study of outcome of screening programme (intervention) with comparison to historical controls (preintervention). SETTING: Hospital and community-based maternity services provided by Northwick Park and Central Middlesex Hospitals in North West London. PARTICIPANTS: Women who gave birth between March 2014 and December 2015 at Northwick Park Hospital. METHODS: Women were screened for GBS at 35-37 weeks and carriers offered intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis. Screening programme was first introduced in hospital (March 2014) and then in community (August 2014). Compliance was audited by review of randomly selected case records. Invasive early-onset GBS infections were defined through GBS being cultured from neonatal blood, cerebrospinal fluid or sterile fluids within 0-6 days of birth. MAIN OUTCOME: Incidence of early-onset GBS infections. RESULTS: 6309 (69%) of the 9098 eligible women were tested. Screening rate improved progressively from 42% in 2014 to 75% in 2015. Audit showed that 98% of women accepted the offer of screening. Recto-vaginal GBS carriage rate was 29.4% (1822/6193). All strains were susceptible to penicillin but 11.3% (206/1822) were resistant to clindamycin. Early onset GBS rate fell from 0.99/1000 live births (25/25276) in the prescreening period to 0.33/1000 in the screening period (Rate Ratio=0.33; p=0.08). In the subset of mothers actually screened, the rate was 0.16/1000 live births (1/6309), (Rate Ratio=0.16; p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings confirm that an antenatal screening programme for prevention of early-onset GBS infection can be implemented in a UK maternity setting and is associated with a fall in infection rates.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Doenças do Recém-Nascido/prevenção & controle , Cuidado Pré-Natal/métodos , Infecções Estreptocócicas/prevenção & controle , Adulto , Feminino , Estudo Historicamente Controlado , Unidades Hospitalares , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Serviços de Saúde Materna , Gravidez , Terceiro Trimestre da Gravidez , Infecções Estreptocócicas/diagnóstico , Infecções Estreptocócicas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Estreptocócicas/transmissão , Streptococcus agalactiae , Reino Unido , Adulto Jovem
3.
HIV Med ; 15(6): 362-6, 2014 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24215444

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The study aimed to assess the feasibility and acceptability of third-trimester antenatal HIV testing within our service after two cases of HIV seroconversion in pregnancy were noted in 2008. North American Guidelines recommend universal third-trimester HIV testing in areas with an HIV prevalence of more than 1 per 1000. The HIV prevalence rate in our area is 3.01 per 1000. METHODS: Pregnant women prior to 28 weeks of gestation were recruited at booking between 1 September 2008 and 31 August 2009 and offered an additional third-trimester HIV test. Consent was obtained and testing was performed by hospital and community midwives. Information was entered into a modified existing electronic maternity database. A qualitative e-mail survey of midwives investigated barriers to participation in the study. RESULTS: A total of 4134 women delivered; three (< 0.1%) declined first-trimester testing. Twenty-two women (0.5%) tested HIV positive, of whom six were newly diagnosed. Overall, 2934 of 4134 women (71%) were offered and accepted a third-trimester HIV test and had results available. Data were unavailable for 195 women (4.7%). A total of 663 of 4131 women (16%) were not offered a third-trimester test. Of 3273 women documented as having been offered a test, 3177 (97.1%) accepted. There were no positive third-trimester tests. Forty of 50 (80%) midwives surveyed responded with questionnaire feedback and cited lack of national policy and extra workload as barriers to performing third-trimester testing. CONCLUSIONS: Third-trimester testing was feasible and consent rates were high in those offered repeat testing. Third-trimester testing has the potential to prevent paediatric HIV infection and universal testing should be considered in high-prevalence areas.


Assuntos
Soropositividade para HIV/diagnóstico , Transmissão Vertical de Doenças Infecciosas/prevenção & controle , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez/diagnóstico , Terceiro Trimestre da Gravidez , Diagnóstico Pré-Natal/métodos , Adulto , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Pesquisa sobre Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Gravidez , Diagnóstico Pré-Natal/estatística & dados numéricos , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Inquéritos e Questionários , Carga de Trabalho
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...