Molecular analysis of inflammatory markers in trauma patients at risk of postinjury complications.

BACKGROUND: Genetic differences associated with individual's immune responses appear to be a major contributing factor to the development of trauma- induced sepsis. Thus, effective treatment of sepsis requires the identification of the patients who are at increased risk for sepsis. METHODS: Sixty-eight patients, of which the majority had an injury severity score >15, and 118 controls from the same geographic region were genotyped. Cytokine and Toll-like receptor (TLR) genotypes and expressions were tested using polymerase chain reaction (PCR). RESULTS: Fifty percent of African American and 42% of Caucasian patients developed posttrauma sepsis. Frequency distribution of the polymorphism for some cytokine genes such as Interleukin (IL)-10 low/high and interferon (IFN)-gamma low producer were statistically different between the septic and aseptic patients, for others, such as tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha, IL-6, and IL-18, there was no statistical difference. The TLR-2 genotypes (A/G) were considered a sepsis risk marker as compared with A/A (62.5% versus 37.5%, p < 0.03; relative risk = 2.5) in African American patients. Cytokine mRNA levels correlated with genotype definition, particularly, for IL-10, IL-6, IL-18, and TNF-alpha. A time course study demonstrated a significant difference in cytokines expression profile in septic and aseptic patients before the development of sepsis. CONCLUSION: Monitoring cytokine expression levels before the disease might predict the outcome of sepsis. A large cohort study is needed to assess the diagnostic potential of the genotypes.

Trauma laparotomy in a rural setting before transfer to a regional center: does it save lives?

BACKGROUND: In the rural setting, long distances may necessitate that a patient undergo emergency laparotomy before transfer to a regional trauma center for definitive management. The purpose of this study was to review the experience of three regional trauma centers with such treated patients. METHODS: This study was a retrospective chart review of patients who underwent emergency laparotomy for trauma before transfer, identified from the respective databases of participating centers over a 6-year period. RESULTS: Fifty-six patients met the study criteria. Twenty-six (46%) were transferred primarily for management of the abdominal injury, and 14 of these patients (25% overall) underwent damage control procedures. Overall survival was 82%. Logistic regression demonstrated that transfer for treatment of the extra-abdominal injury was the only significant predictor of survival (odds ratio, 34.33; 95% confidence interval, 1.80-655.24). CONCLUSION: Although patients undergoing laparotomy who were subsequently transferred for management of abdominal injury have reasonable outcome, patients transferred primarily for management of extra-abdominal injury seem to have a survival advantage.

Enalaprilat improves systemic cardiovascular parameters and mesenteric blood flow during hypotensive resuscitation from hemorrhagic shock in dogs.

Resuscitative interventions that improve mesenteric perfusion without causing instability in systemic arterial pressures may be helpful for improving trauma patient outcomes. Blocking angiotensin II formation with enalaprilat may be such an intervention. Two questions were addressed in this two-part study investigating resuscitation from hemorrhagic shock in dogs: Can systemic arterial pressures be maintained while administering a constant rate infusion of enalaprilat during resuscitation, and can enalaprilat improve cardiovascular status during resuscitation? Animals were hemorrhaged to a mean arterial pressure (MAP) of 40 to 45 mmHg for 30 min and then 30 to 35 mmHg for 30 min. Group I (n = 5) was resuscitated to a MAP 60 to 65 mmHg with enalaprilat (0.02 mg/kg/h). Group II was resuscitated to a MAP 40 to 45 mmHg with (n = 5) or without (n = 5) enalaprilat. Resuscitation in both groups consisted of intermittent intravenous lactated Ringer's solution (60 mL/kg/h) to reach and maintain the target MAPs. Systemic arterial pressures were unaffected by enalaprilat during resuscitation in Group I, allowing us to proceed to the second study. During severely hypotensive resuscitation (Group II), systemic arterial pressures were also stable and enalaprilat administration was associated with increases (P < or = 0.02) in cardiac index (+1.2 L/min/m2), stroke volume index (SVI) (+14.5 mL/m2), superior mesenteric artery flow (+80 mL/min), stroke work (+561 mmHg/mL/m2), and left ventricular power output (+55.7 mmHg/L/min/m2). Corresponding increases were not observed in controls. We conclude that administration of a constant rate infusion of enalaprilat during resuscitation can be accomplished without causing a hypotensive crisis. Since enalaprilat significantly improved cardiovascular status including mesenteric perfusion even during intentional hypotension, it has potential value for improving the treatment of trauma patients.