Long-Term Changes in Free Nipple Graft Morphology and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Gender-Affirming Mastectomies.

BACKGROUND: After gender-affirming mastectomies with free nipple grafts, satisfaction with nipples tends to fall short behind chest outcomes. This might be related to changes in nipple areolar complex (NAC) dimensions over time. Therefore, the aim of this study is to establish the long-term changes in NAC morphology and compare these to cisgender male NAC outcomes. MATERIALS: An observational, cross-sectional study was performed. Data from two prospective cohorts were collected: (1) transgender men after a mastectomy with free nipple grafts and (2) cisgender men (reference sample). Demographics and 3-D images were collected for both groups. NAC measurements were performed on the 3-D images at 4 time points (7-, 30-, 90- and 365-days postoperative) in transgender men and once in cisgender men. Furthermore, the BODY-Q (nipple module) was administered postoperatively at 30-, 90- and 365-days in transgender men. RESULTS: In total, 67 transgender and 150 cisgender men were included. NAC width and height in trans men changed from 21.5 mm (±2.7) to 23.8 mm (±3.9, p<0.001) and 16.2 mm (±2.5) to 14.7 mm (±3.0, p=0.01) within a year, respectively. On average, the NACs increasingly rotated 21 degrees in the latero-caudal direction (p<0.001). The mean NAC width and height in cisgender men were 28.1 mm (±5) and 20.7 mm (±4), being significantly larger than in transgender men. Satisfaction for size, shape and flatness decreased significantly after postoperative day 30 (p=<0.05) in transgender men. CONCLUSIONS: Morphology of and satisfaction with the NACs in transgender men significantly changed over time. Understanding and incorporating these differences into pre-operative counseling and surgical planning might help increase patient satisfaction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Patient-Reported Long-Term Outcomes After Free Vascularized Fibula Graft in Spinal Reconstruction: a 24-year Cohort.

PURPOSE: The use of free vascularized fibula grafts (FVFG) in complex spinal deformity surgery intends to allow for life-long stability of the spine with good long-term clinical outcome. However, these long-term outcomes of this technique are still lacking. The objective of this study is to report the long-term postoperative outcomes and establish the long-term viability of this method for spinal reconstruction. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted in all patients who underwent spinal reconstructive surgery utilizing a FVFG at a tertiary medical centre. Questionnaires taken from the participants were the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability (also known as Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)), Scoliosis Research Society 22r (SRS-22), the EQ-5D-5L and a self-assembled questionnaire regarding donor site comorbidities and patient satisfaction. RESULTS: Over a period of 24 years (1995-2019), we used FVFG for spinal reconstruction in 31 patients. A total of 25 patients were included in this study, 8 patients were deceased at the time of this study, and sixteen patients responded to the questionnaires. Patient satisfaction was rated 6.8 out of 10, the average SRS-22r score was 3.6, EQ-5D-5L score was 0.725, and the ODI score showed a minimal disability (0-20%) postoperatively. Overall complication-free survival was 8.9 years. Nine patients underwent a re-operation in the spinal area; five for the removal of the spinal instrumentation. CONCLUSION: Patients reported satisfied and good long-term outcomes following FVFG surgical procedure for complex spinal deformities. Therefore, considering the alternatives, this procedure provides a good long-term solution for complex spinal deformity surgery.

Within-patient randomized clinical trial comparing incisional negative-pressure wound therapy with suction drains in gender-affirming mastectomies.

BACKGROUND: Incisional negative-pressure wound therapy (iNPWT) is widely adopted by different disciplines for multiple indications. Questions about the most appropriate uses and value of iNPWT have been raised. METHODS: An open-label within-patient RCT was conducted in transgender men undergoing gender-affirming mastectomies. The objective was to determine the effect of iNPWT as a substitute for standard dressing and suction drains on wound healing complications. One chest side was randomized to receive the iNPWT intervention, and the other to standard dressing with suction drain. The primary endpoints were wound healing complications (haematoma, seroma, infection, and dehiscence) after three months. Additional outcomes were pain according to a numerical rating scale and patient satisfaction one week after surgery. RESULTS: Eighty-five patients were included, of whom 81 received both the iNPWT and standard treatment. Drain removal criteria were met within 24 h in 95 per cent of the patients. No significant decrease in wound healing complications was registered on the iNPWT side, but the seroma rate was significantly increased. In contrast, patients experienced both significantly less pain and increased comfort on the iNPWT side. No medical device-related adverse events were registered. CONCLUSION: Substituting short-term suction drains with iNPWT in gender-affirming mastectomies increased the seroma rates and did not decrease the amount of wound healing complications. Registration number: NTR7412 (Netherlands Trial Register).

The ideal location of the male nipple-areolar complex: A pinpointing algorithm.

Background: In the treatment of gender dysphoria, appropriate nipple-areola complex (NAC) positioning is essential for achieving a natural appearing male chest after subcutaneous mastectomy. An accurate predictive model for the ideal personalized position of the NAC is still lacking. The aim of this study is to determine the anthropometry of the male chest to create individualized guidelines for appropriate NAC positioning in the preoperative setting. Materials and methods: Cisgender male participants were recruited. Multiple chest measurements were manually recorded. Best subset regression using linear models was used to select predictors for the horizontal coordinate (nipple-nipple distance; NN) and vertical coordinate (sternal notch-nipple distance; SNN) of the NAC. Internal validation was assessed using bootstrapping. Furthermore, a cohort of transgender men who had received a mastectomy with replantation of nipples according to current practice was identified. Comparison testing between the algorithm and standard practice was performed to test the limitations of standard practice. Results: One hundred and fifty cis male participants were included (median age: 26, IQR: 22-34 years). Four predictors were found to predict NN (age, weight, chest circumference (CC), anterior-axillar fold to anterior-axillar fold (AUX-AUX)) and reads as follows: NN = 4.11 + 0.035*age + 0.041*weight + 0.093*CC + 0.140*AUX-AUX Two predictors were found to predict SNN (NN and weight), and reads as follows: SNN = 7.248 + 0.303*NN + 0.072*weight. Both models performed well (Bootstrapped R2: 0.63 (NN), 0.50 (SNN)) and outperformed previous models predicting NAC position. Ninety-six transgender men were eligible for evaluation of current practice and showed an average placement error of -0.9 cm for NN and +2.2 cm for SNN. Conclusion: The non-standardized approach of NAC repositioning results in a significant error of nipple placement. We suggest that the two predictive models for NN and SNN can be used to optimize NAC positioning on the masculinized chest wall.Supplemental data for this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1080/26895269.2021.1884926.