Vision health perspectives on Breaking Bad: Ophthalmic sequelae of methamphetamine use disorder.

Methamphetamine use has become a rampant public health issue that not only causes devastating consequences to the user but also poses a burden to surrounding communities. A spectrum of ophthalmic sequelae is associated with methamphetamine use and includes episcleritis, scleritis, corneal ulceration, panophthalmitis, endophthalmitis, retinal vasculitis, and retinopathy. In many instances, prompt recognition of the condition and associated infectious process and early initiation of antimicrobial therapy are crucial steps to preventing vision loss. In this review, we summarize the reported ocular complications that may result from methamphetamine use in addition to several postulated mechanisms regarding the ocular toxicity of methamphetamine. The increasing prevalence of methamphetamine use as a public health threat highlights the need for continued investigation of this ophthalmologic issue.

Ophthalmic complications associated with methamphetamine use disorder.

Purpose: To describe the devastating ophthalmic sequelae of methamphetamine use disorder in two patients who developed vision loss from ocular complications, including keratitis and endophthalmitis. Observations: Case 1 is a 26-year-old male with hepatitis C, poorly controlled type 1 diabetes, and chronic methamphetamine use who presented with a corneal ulcer in the left eye. Corneal culture grew Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus viridans, prompting antibiotic therapy. Follow-up exam showed peripheral corneal ulceration OD and diffusely vascularized and scarred cornea OS, although nonadherence was reported. Vision eventually worsened to hand motions OD and light perception OS.Case 2 is a 44-year-old woman with hepatitis C, acute myeloid leukemia, dry eye syndrome secondary to chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), and chronic methamphetamine use who presented with a diffuse corneal infiltrate and hypopyon. She underwent emergent corneal transplantation, vitrectomy, and broad-spectrum intravitreal and intravenous antibiotics. Vitreous cultures were positive for Streptococcus pyogenes. However, progressive disease eventually required enucleation despite initial globe salvaging measures. Conclusions and importance: These two patient cases highlight the risk of vision loss or blindness due to the detrimental effects of chronic methamphetamine use on the eye, including the potential for keratitis and endophthalmitis. Given the increasing prevalence of methamphetamine use disorder in the United States, further understanding of these toxicities and preventive strategies are needed.

Periocular Manifestation of Obstructive Sleep Apnea as a Novel Perioperative Screening Tool.

PURPOSE: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) presents perioperative challenges with increased risk for complications. Floppy eyelid syndrome (FES) is associated with OSA yet has not been addressed perioperatively. The current standard for perioperative OSA screening includes assessing patient risk factors or the STOP-BANG tool, which requires an active participant. We aimed to confirm a connection between FES and OSA in presurgical patients and develop a screening method appropriate for patients with perioperative OSA risk. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 162 presurgical pre-anesthesia clinic patients were enrolled. Screening questions determined eligibility. Those who were pregnant or aged < 19 were excluded. Control group included those with a STOP-BANG score < 3. Experimental group included those with BMI > 35 and OSA diagnosis. Examiners photographed participants' eyes with vertical and horizontal retraction while two blinded ophthalmologists used a grading scale to review grade of eyelid laxity. RESULTS: Differences in habitus, ASA score, and hypertension as a comorbidity were significant. Sensitivity of FES screening was 52% (CI 37-66%) and specificity was 56% (CI 46-66%) for reviewer 1. For reviewer 2, sensitivity was 48% (CI 28-69%) and specificity was 72% (CI 60-81%). Negative predictive value was 86% (CI 81-90) for reviewer 1 and 88% (CI 83-92%) for reviewer 2. Inter-rater agreement was moderate. CONCLUSION: While specificity and sensitivity were lower than anticipated, negative predictive value was high. Given this strong negative predictive value, our findings indicate using eyelid retraction to screen for FES has perioperative clinical utility. These findings encourage further research addressing the connection of lid laxity/FES to OSA. KEY POINTS: • Aimed to investigate if a FES screening tool could identify perioperative OSA risk. • Negative predictive value for FES with OSA was 86%. • Observing periocular lid laxity has clinical utility; is feasible in any patient.