Combined acetaminophen and ibuprofen for pain relief after oral surgery in adults: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Acetaminophen is often used with a non-steriodal anti-inflammatory drug for acute pain. Hitherto, these drugs have had to be given separately, typically at different time intervals. Maxigesic tablets combine acetaminophen and ibuprofen in clinically appropriate doses to simplify administration and dosage regimen. We compared this combination with each of the constituent drugs for the relief of pain after extraction of third molar teeth. METHODS: Adults (more than 16 yr) having one or more wisdom teeth removed under general or local anaesthesia were instructed to take two tablets before operation, then two tablets every 6 h for up to 48 h of: (i) a combination of acetaminophen 500 mg and ibuprofen 150 mg per tablet (Maxigesic); (ii) acetaminophen 500 mg per tablet alone; or (iii) ibuprofen 150 mg per tablet alone. The primary outcome measure was the area under the curve (AUC) of the 100 mm visual analogue scale pain measurements taken for up to 48 h after surgery, divided by time, at rest and on activity. Pharmacokinetic data were collected in a subset of patients. RESULTS: The mean (sem) time-corrected AUC on rest and activity, respectively, were: combination group 22.3 (3.2) and 28.4 (3.4); acetaminophen group 33.0 (3.1) and 40.4 (3.3); and ibuprofen group 34.8 (3.2) and 40.2 (3.4); P<0.01 for each of the four comparisons of combination vs constituent drug. There was no pharmacokinetic interaction between acetaminophen and ibuprofen administered together. CONCLUSIONS: Maxigesic tablets provide superior pain relief after oral surgery to acetaminophen or ibuprofen alone.

Spontaneous loss of T-cell tolerance to glutamic acid decarboxylase in murine insulin-dependent diabetes.

Insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) in non-obese diabetic (NOD) mice results from the T-lymphocyte-mediated destruction of the insulin-producing pancreatic beta-cells and serves as a model for human IDDM. Whereas a number of autoantibodies are associated with IDDM, it is unclear when and to what beta-cell antigens pathogenic T cells become activated during the disease process. We report here that a T-helper-1 (Th1) response to glutamate decarboxylase develops in NOD mice at the same time as the onset of insulitis. This response is initially limited to a confined region of glutamate decarboxylase, but later spreads intramolecularly to additional determinants. Subsequently, T-cell reactivity arises to other beta-cell antigens, consistent with intermolecular diversification of the response. Prevention of the spontaneous anti-glutamate decarboxylase response, by tolerization of glutamate decarboxylase-reactive T cells, blocks the development of T-cell autoimmunity to other beta-cell antigens, as well as insulitis and diabetes. Our data suggest that (1) glutamate decarboxylase is a key target antigen in the induction of murine IDDM; (2) autoimmunity to glutamate decarboxylase triggers T-cell responses to other beta-cell antigens, and (3) spontaneous autoimmune disease can be prevented by tolerization to the initiating target antigen.

Permanent diabetes without serological evidence of autoimmunity after transient neonatal diabetes.

OBJECTIVE: To describe a probable association between TNDM and subsequent permanent IDDM. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A longitudinal follow-up of a single case from birth to 12 yr of age was conducted analyzing sequential OGTTs, ICAs, AIAs, anti-GAD antibodies, and other organ-specific and nonspecific antibodies. RESULTS: A small-for-gestational-age infant developed hyperglycemia at 20 h of age and required insulin therapy for the 1st 14 wk of life (TNDM). Transient hyperglycemia and ketonuria were noted again at age 2 yr 10 mo during an intercurrent illness, but OGTT was normal; and ICA, AIA, anti-GAD65 and anti-GAD67 antibodies, antithyroid microsomal, anti-gastric parietal cell, antiadrenal, antisteroidal, and antinuclear antibodies were negative 3 wk later. At age 9 yr, hyperglycemia returned and persisted in the setting of hypoinsulinemia; ICA, AIA, anti-GAD65 and anti-GAD67 antibodies, and other organ-specific and nonspecific antibodies were again negative. Insulin therapy was initiated and has been maintained over 3 yr of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Our case is the fifth reported with permanent diabetes occurring after resolution of TNDM. The etiology of permanent diabetes in this setting is unknown but, unlike classical IDDM, appears unrelated to autoimmunity in our patient. The true frequency of this association remains unknown.