Use of human patient simulation and validation of the Team Situation Awareness Global Assessment Technique (TSAGAT): a multidisciplinary team assessment tool in trauma education.

OBJECTIVE: Situation awareness (SA) is a vital construct for decision making in intense, dynamic environments such as trauma resuscitation. Human patient simulation (HPS) allows for a safe environment where individuals can develop these skills. Trauma resuscitation is performed by multidisciplinary teams that are traditionally difficult to globally assess. Our objective was to create and validate a novel tool to measure SA in multidisciplinary trauma teams using a HPS--the Team Situation Awareness Global Assessment Technique (TSAGAT). SETTING: Memorial University Simulation Centre. DESIGN/PARTICIPANTS: Using HPS, 4 trauma teams completed 2 separate trauma scenarios. Student, junior resident, senior resident, and attending staff teams each had 3 members (trauma team leader, nurse, and airway manager). Individual SAGATs were developed by experts in each respective field and contained shared and complimentary knowledge questions. Teams were assessed with SAGAT in real time and with traditional checklists using video review. TSAGAT was calculated as the sum of individual SAGAT scores and was compared with the traditional checklist scores. RESULTS: Shared, complimentary, and TSAGAT scores improved with increasing team experience. Differences between teams for TSAGAT and complimentary knowledge were statistically significant (p < 0.05). Mean checklist differences between teams also reached statistical significance (p < 0.05). TSAGAT scores correlated strongly with traditional checklist scores (Pearson correlation r = 0.996). Interrater reliability for the checklist tool was high (Pearson correlation r = 0.937). CONCLUSION: TSAGAT is the first valid and reliable assessment tool incorporating SA and HPS for multidisciplinary team performance in trauma resuscitation. TSAGAT could compliment or improve on current assessment methods and curricula in trauma and critical care and provides a template for team assessment in other areas of surgical education.

Reversal of high spinal anesthesia with cerebrospinal lavage after inadvertent intrathecal injection of local anesthetic in an obstetric patient.

PURPOSE: High or total spinal anesthesia commonly results from accidental placement of an epidural catheter in the intrathecal space with subsequent injection of excessive volumes of local anesthetic. Cerebrospinal lavage has been shown to be effective at reversing the effects of high/total spinal anesthesia but is rarely considered in obstetric cases. Here, we describe the use of cerebrospinal lavage to prevent potential complications from high/total spinal anesthesia after unintentional placement of an intrathecal catheter in a labouring obstetric patient. CLINICAL FEATURES: A 34-yr-old female presented to the labour and delivery unit in active labour. Epidural anesthesia was initiated, and after the first bolus dose, the patient experienced lower extremity motor block and shortness of breath. A high spinal was confirmed, and cerebrospinal lavage was performed. In total, 40 mL of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) were exchanged for an equal volume of normal saline. The patient's breathing difficulties and motor block resolved quickly, and a new epidural catheter was placed after removal of the spinal catheter. Pain control was effective, and the patient delivered a healthy baby. CONCLUSION: We show that exchange of CSF for normal saline can be used successfully to manage a high spinal in an obstetric patient. Our results suggest that CSF lavage could potentially be an important and helpful adjunct to the conventional supportive management of obstetric patients in the event of inadvertent high or total spinal anesthesia.