Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Pediatr Health Care ; 25(4): 235-49, 2011.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21700138

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Children, particularly African American children, bear a disproportionate burden of asthma and are at highest risk for associated morbidity and mortality. The under-utilization of the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program (NAEPP) guidelines across all demographics and the under use of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) as controller therapy in these children are well-documented. The primary aim of this study was to increase health care provider (HCP) adherence to the NAEPP guidelines by means of a guideline reminder tool, the Multi-colored Simplified Asthma Guideline Reminder, consequently increasing the prescription of ICS in this population. METHOD: This study had a pre-experimental design with descriptive analysis. RESULTS: The Multi-colored Simplified Asthma Guideline Reminder was effective in increasing HCP adherence to the NAEPP guidelines as evidenced by increased use of ICS as controller therapy. DISCUSSION: Despite the increasing prevalence and burden of asthma in African American children, the associated prescriptive use of ICS has not increased substantially in the past decade. The greatest obstacle in the scope of improving asthma outcomes is the underuse of ICS by HCPs.


Assuntos
Asma/terapia , Negro ou Afro-Americano , Cooperação do Paciente , Administração por Inalação , Adolescente , Corticosteroides/administração & dosagem , Corticosteroides/uso terapêutico , Asma/tratamento farmacológico , Asma/prevenção & controle , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Humanos , Auditoria Médica , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , Estados Unidos
2.
J Am Acad Nurse Pract ; 21(8): 417-22, 2009 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19689437

RESUMO

Clinical practice guidelines decrease variation in health care because they standardize the care offered by healthcare providers. Seventeen years after publication, the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program (NAEPP) guidelines are considered the "gold standard" in asthma care, yet they remain underutilized despite three revisions with the latest in July 2007. Multiple factors are presented for lack of adherence to the guidelines. This article discusses the Multicolored, Simplified Asthma Guideline Reminder (MSAGR), an algorithm chart intervention for helping change clinicians' behavior for better adherence to the NAEPP guidelines, and describes the conceptual framework underpinning this intervention as a means of predicting better outcomes for providers and children.


Assuntos
Asma , Competência Clínica , Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Enfermeiros Clínicos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Sistemas de Alerta , Humanos , Padrões de Prática Médica , Estados Unidos
3.
Clin Rev Allergy Immunol ; 27(2): 133-45, 2004 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15576897

RESUMO

Asthma is a chronic disease that is highly prevalent around the world with increasing societal and economic burden. National Asthma Educational and Preventive Program (NAEPP) and Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) are evidence-based documents designed to help clinicians make appropriate decisions for their patients and to reduce undesirable variation in the care of asthmatic patients. It is a generally accepted fact that asthma specialists achieved better and improved asthma outcomes for their patients when compared with primary care physicians (PCPs). These outcome differences are somewhat related to PCPs' poor adherence to published NAEPP guidelines. Multi-Colored Simplified Asthma Guideline Reminder (MSAGR) is the first user-friendly single-sheet convenient asthma tool designed for clinicians after barriers to the poor adherence to asthma guidelines in primary care settings were identified. Voluntary acceptance and utilization of MSAGR resulted in fewer emergency room visits and hospitalizations for their patients. General acceptance of MSAGR (more than 1 million copies requested by clinicians globally), and overwhelming positive comments by asthma care providers, strongly advocate a need for real-time, pragmatic clinical tools not only in asthma, but also in other chronic diseases such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and depression, etc. In this brief review, we discuss how clinicians, patients, and payers are utilizing these simplified asthma tools to improve asthma care in their community.


Assuntos
Asma/diagnóstico , Asma/terapia , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Padrões de Prática Médica , Adulto , Alergia e Imunologia , Cuidadores/educação , Criança , Cor , Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Humanos , Médicos de Família/educação
4.
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol ; 88(3): 326-30, 2002 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11926628

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Clinicians in general have not widely and consistently used asthma guidelines in their practices around the world. This study identifies reasons for the poor adherence to asthma guidelines by primary care physicians (PCPs), and simultaneously introduces multicolored simplified asthma guideline reminder (MSAGR) as a practical tool to enhance adherence to asthma guidelines. METHODS: Sixty-nine PCPs were given a simple, one-page, fill-in-the-blank questionnaire on the classification of asthma severity as defined in National Asthma Education and Prevention Program guidelines, using patients' symptoms, peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR)/forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) value, PEFR variability, and step therapy based on asthma severity. Also, they were given a questionnaire on barriers to using asthma guidelines and MSAGR for evaluation. In one targeted community, free copies of MSAGR were made available to PCPs, and data on emergency room visits and hospitalization of asthmatic patients were analyzed. RESULTS: Of the PCPs, 16% correctly classified mild, intermittent asthma, 13% mild, persistent asthma, 8% moderate, persistent asthma, and 8% severe, persistent asthma based on the combined patient's symptoms, PEFR or FEV1 value and PEFR variability as defined in National Asthma Education and Prevention Program guidelines. One hundred percent of the PCPs chose inhaled beta2-agonists as quick relief medication. Fifty percent of the PCPs chose inhaled steroids, leukotriene antagonists, oral theophylline, and long acting beta-agonists in various combinations for different severity of asthma. Eighty percent of the physicians failed to select the appropriate dosages of inhaled steroids for different severities of asthma. Ninety-five percent of PCPs reported that MSAGR made using the guidelines easier for them. In the targeted community, asthma-related emergency room visits decreased 22.5% and hospitalizations by 26.9%. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study that identified the reasons for poor adherence to asthma guidelines by PCPs, and introduced MSAGR as a practical "low-tech" tool to promote better adherence to asthma guidelines. MSAGR presents patient-specific recommendations, based on asthma guidelines in a user-friendly format that can save the physician time in real-world primary care settings, where such information is often needed instantly. The overwhelming majority of PCPs strongly agreed that MSAGR helped them recall the classification of asthma severity in a timely manner, to inquire about various triggers, and to use step therapy accurately and confidently. In one targeted community, MSAGR helped clinicians in primary care settings to achieve better asthma outcomes and to reduce both emergency room visits and hospitalizations.


Assuntos
Asma/tratamento farmacológico , Médicos de Família , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Adulto , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...