Guilt and Burnout in Medical Students.

THEORY: Burnout is prevalent among medical students and is correlated with negative feelings, behaviors, and outcomes. Empathy is a desired trait for medical students that has been correlated with reduced burnout. The concept of guilt is closely related to concern about the well-being of others; therefore, feelings of guilt may be associated with empathy. Excessive guilt poses an increased risk for internalized distress, symptoms such as anhedonia, and may be related to burnout. The relationship between pathogenic guilt and burnout in medical students is unknown. HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesize that pathogenic guilt is present and related to both burnout and empathy in medical students. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey study of all students in one medical school. Data were collected in February 2020. The Oldenburg Burnout Inventory (OBLI), Toronto Empathy Questionnaire (TEQ), and Interpersonal Guilt Questionaire-67 (IGQ-67) were used. A modified version of IGQ-67 was used to measure four subscales of pathogenic guilt: survival guilt, separation guilt, omnipotence guilt, and self-hate guilt. Data analyses for this study including screening, evaluation of assumptions, descriptive statistics, reliabilities, one-way ANOVA, and correlation coefficients, were conducted using SPSS version 26. RESULTS: Of 300, 168 (56.0%) students participated in the study. Survival, omnipotence, and self-hate classes of pathogenic guilt were positively correlated with burnout. Empathy was correlated with two classes of pathogenic guilt: survival and omnipotence. Empathy was inversely related to burnout (disengagement). CONCLUSIONS: Pathogenic guilt may be a contributor to burnout in medical students. Guilt should be a target of prevention and treatment in burnout in medical students.Supplemental data for this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1080/10401334.2021.1891544.

Pregnancy Status is Associated With Screening for Alcohol and Other Substance Use in the Emergency Department.

OBJECTIVES: Determine the rates of screening for substance use in pregnant women versus non-pregnant women attending the emergency department (ED). METHODS: We captured all ED visits by women of childbearing age (12-50 years in our study) over a 5-year period (2012-2017) (n = 72,752) from a local community hospital. The 2742 pregnant women were then matched by ethnicity, marital status, and arrival method to 9888 non-pregnant women. We then compared rates of screening for substance use by pregnancy status stratifying by age and diagnosis. RESULTS: The proportion of non-pregnant women who were screened for substance use was 3.66% compared to 1.90% of pregnant women, yielding an odds ratio (OR) of 1.96 (95% CI = 1.44 to 2.67). We then stratified the results by presenting complaint and age. Non-pregnant women 14 to 19 and 30 to 34 had the highest likelihood for screening (OR > 3.0). The presenting complaint showed little effect on screening. CONCLUSION: Pregnant women were screened only 51% as often as non-pregnant women for substance use in the ED. These results are of particular concern as we continue to see a rise in substance use during pregnancy which results in an increased burden on the healthcare system and society. This study replicates a previous study showing that the rates of screening are lower for pregnant women than non-pregnant women presenting to the ED. Earlier recognition of substance use offers increased opportunities for intervention and prevention of adverse outcomes from substance use during both the current pregnancy and future pregnancies.