Implantation technique of His bundle pacing.

His bundle pacing (HBP) preserves physiological ventricular synchrony, with clinical benefits particularly evident when a high percentage of ventricular pacing is required. First experiences with standard leads and manually shaped stylets produced the impression that HBP is highly complex and time-consuming. However, with dedicated leads and sheaths, reliable HBP can be achieved in routine clinical practice. Implantation success in more than 90% of patients can be reached with current technology and has been shown to be reliable and effective, both at implantation and during long-term follow-up. At the same time, fluoroscopy and total procedural time can be reduced. New customized technologies will continue to improve the implant success rate and system performance. Large randomized trials will prove the long-term clinical benefits of HBP definitively and may render HBP the first choice in patients requiring ventricular pacing.

Electrogram-only guided approach to His bundle pacing with minimal fluoroscopy: A single-center experience.

INTRODUCTION: His bundle pacing (HBP) is the most physiological pacing. The standard technique based on fluoroscopic approach might be challenging and fluoro consuming. Targeting the His guided exclusively by the electrical signals could enable a precise lead implant, thus reducing fluoroscopy time (FT) and X-ray dose, desirable both for patients and operators. The aim of the study is to evaluate the feasibility, efficacy, and safety both acutely and at 30 days of the electrogram (EGM)-guided HBP with minimal or no fluoroscopy. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between October and December 2018, 41 consecutive patients underwent EGM-guided HBP. Successful HBP was obtained in 39 (95%) patients, (30 males, 78 ± 10 years). Selective HBP (S-HBP) was achieved in 23 (59%), nonselective HBP (NS-HBP) in 16 (41%) patients. The final HBP lead position was reached in 31 (79.4%) patients without fluoroscopy, only guided by electrical signals. In eight patients a minimal fluoroscopy (mean, 8 seconds) has been required. The sheath's cutting and the slack of the lead were routinely performed under fluoroscopy. No difference was observed in FT for HBP lead placement in S-HBP and NS-HBP (mean, 8.1 ± 25 vs 7.5 ± 20 seconds, P = .8; median value 0 vs 0 seconds). No differences were observed in FT for the entire procedure, total dose area product and total procedural time in S-HBP and NS-HBP. Lead dislodgement occurred in one (2.6%) patient 1 day after the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: HBP could be performed safely and efficiently using the EGMs, with minimal or no fluoroscopy. Fluoroscopy was required during sheath removal and atrial lead placement.

Long term performance and safety of His bundle pacing: A multicenter experience.

INTRODUCTION: Several single-center short-term studies have demonstrated the feasibility, safety, and positive clinical outcomes of permanent His bundle pacing (HBP). We performed a retrospective study to evaluate long-term technical and safety performances of HBP in a large population of pacemaker patients from two different centers. METHODS AND RESULTS: The analysis includes 844 patients (345 female, mean age = 75 ± 9 years) who underwent successful permanent HBP for pacemaker indications from 2004 to 2016. The main endpoints were long term electrical performances including pacing threshold, sensing, impedance, and freedom from pacing related complications. The pacing indication was AV Block in 348 (41.2%) patients, sinus node disease in 147 (17.4%), any bradycardia indication in patients with atrial fibrillation in 335 (39.7%) patients and need for cardiac resynchronization therapy in 14 (1.7%) patients. Mean pacing capture thresholds and sensed R waves were 1.6 V and 5.8 mV, respectively at implant and 2.0 V and 6.1 mV at chronic follow-up. During the median follow up of 3 years (interquartile range = 1-6 years), HBP was free of any complication in 91.6% of patients. In the first 368 patients, HBP was achieved using a deflectable curve delivery system, while in 476 using the fixed curve sheath. A significant difference was found in the thresholds (2.4 ± 1.0 V and 1.7 ± 1.1 V, P < .001, respectively) and complications (11.9% and 4.2%, P < .001, respectively) between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Permanent HBP was safe and effective during long-term follow-up. The fixed curved delivery sheath offered significantly better electrical parameters and reliability over time. The results of this multicenter study are consistent with recent studies.